Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-29 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Lennart, I'm going to quickly top post here so forgive me for being rude. Serge and I worked out some patches that seem to address the devtmpfs issues nicely. Still got a few oddities to iron out but the big fundamental one got fixed and is working. Many thanks for that. The problem with error

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 26.10.12 18:39, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote: > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. > Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to > systemd's f

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:59:21AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:05 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" > > wrote: > > > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > > > network.service - LSB: Bring

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 17:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:01:36PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Kay, Olav, I think that we're being a bit unfair towards > > Michael. There's an implication that his posts were offensive, but they > > weren't. Overly verbose,

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:05 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" > wrote: > > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > >

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:01:36PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Kay, Olav, I think that we're being a bit unfair towards > Michael. There's an implication that his posts were offensive, but they > weren't. Overly verbose, yes, repetitive, yes, agitated, etc, but not > intended as rud

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Oleksii Shevchuk
> Odd, the oldest systemd version I have around is 38, and even that has a > working journal that catches stdout/stderr of services. There is some problem with systemctl status and stderr/stdout: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55320 This leads to such behavior: > cat ~/.config/syst

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Jon Stanley
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > Excuse me? I'm a kernel maintainer and a member of the Samba team. I > have dedicated almost 2 decades to promoting and developing several > dozen open source projects I will not enumerate here. I don't know or particularly care who

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 08:20:51AM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:03 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" > > wrote: > > > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > > > network.service - LSB: B

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:01 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > >> sent too quickly.. > > >> >

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield > wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > >> sent too quickly.. > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > >> > On Fri, Oc

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Oleksii Shevchuk
> Ok fine... So I get logged in and I run this... > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:23:07 > +0400; 1min

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: >> sent too quickly.. >> >> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >> > > BTW... No

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > sent too quickly.. > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know > >

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
sent too quickly.. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know > > in a big organization not everybody knows everyone but... > > I

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know > in a big organization not everybody knows everyone but... I prefer judging myself. And at the moment I see you using words like: - crap - POS -- R

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 22:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > > > > >> This should help. Obviously, j

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield > wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > > >> This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. > > > > And journalctl gave me ja

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > >> This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. > > And journalctl gave me jack shit trying to figure this out and I really > DON'T need yet another o

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > It's still failing and it's giving me conflicting errors about > "directory already exists" and then "file does not exist" (on the > directory). This POS is driving me nuts with lack of intelligent > debugging information! Throwing ta

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. And journalctl gave me jack shit trying to figure this out and I really DON'T need yet another obscure command to dig out errors that should have been presented in th

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 20:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield > > wrote: > > > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > > > obfuscating errors in

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield > wrote: > > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > > obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. > > Almost every upgrade pr

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.10.2012 01:51, schrieb Kok: >> Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:23:07 >> +0400; 1min 57s ago > > hmm, EXIT CODE failure. It exited with a non-zero status. > >> Process: 91 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited, >> status=209

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. > Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to > systemd's failure to p