On Sun, 16.06.13 19:18, David Greaves (da...@dgreaves.com) wrote:
>
> On 06/06/13 08:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 18.05.13 23:44, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
> >> So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> >> is some distribution that didn't
В Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:18:45 +0100
David Greaves пишет:
> On 06/06/13 08:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 18.05.13 23:44, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
> >> So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> >> is some distribution that didn't choose this p
On 06/06/13 08:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 18.05.13 23:44, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
>> So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
>> is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
>> not merged, what is the canonical loc
On Sun, 19.05.13 11:10, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> В Sat, 18 May 2013 23:50:52 -0700
> David Strauss пишет:
>
> >
> > > - some package install directly file in /usr/lib/systemd/system/*.wants
> > > There is some special case ( like plymouth ), but usually, that
> > > should
On Sat, 18.05.13 23:44, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After the last discussion on fedora-devel about boot times[1], I have
> been looking at the various units on my disk and if I could code
> something in rpmlint ( tool to verify a rpm against a set of guidelines
> ) to have p
Le lundi 20 mai 2013 à 19:58 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> > is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
> > not merged, what is
Le lundi 20 mai 2013 à 19:58 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> > is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
> > not merged, what is
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
> not merged, what is the canonical location ( ie, for Opensuse, Mandriva,
> since they are bot
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 11:21 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le samedi 18 mai 2013 à 23:50 -0700, David Strauss a écrit :
> > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > > - we should avoid as much as possible to use Type=forking when we can
> > > avoid it.
[... snip ...]
> > That's
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:44:48PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After the last discussion on fedora-devel about boot times[1], I have
> been looking at the various units on my disk and if I could code
> something in rpmlint ( tool to verify a rpm against a set of guidelines
> ) to have
Le samedi 18 mai 2013 à 23:50 -0700, David Strauss a écrit :
> I'm skipping to the questions I can answer.
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > - we should avoid as much as possible to use Type=forking when we can
> > avoid it.
> >
> > This one is likely the one that wi
I hopped in IRC just now if you'd like to chat.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> Do you mean, "installing directly under /usr/lib/systemd/system/*.wants
> should be an error"? It was the actual question.
Wait, do you mean versus putting WantedBy= into the unit? That depends
on packaging policy. RPM packaging policy i
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> Do you mean, "installing directly under /usr/lib/systemd/system/*.wants
> should be an error"? It was the actual question.
>
> I do not think there is single answer in all cases. IMHO it is
> perfectly valid to use /usr/lib/systemd/system
В Sat, 18 May 2013 23:50:52 -0700
David Strauss пишет:
>
> > - some package install directly file in /usr/lib/systemd/system/*.wants
> > There is some special case ( like plymouth ), but usually, that
> > shouldn't be done directly in the package, but better done in %post, and
> > in /etc ?
>
>
В Sat, 18 May 2013 23:44:48 +0200
Michael Scherer пишет:
>
> So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
> not merged, what is the canonical location ( ie, for Opensuse, Mandriva,
> since they ar
I'm skipping to the questions I can answer.
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> - we should avoid as much as possible to use Type=forking when we can
> avoid it.
>
> This one is likely the one that will be met with resistance from
> packagers, so before adding it as warning,
17 matches
Mail list logo
