Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-10-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 01/10/12 09:42 did > gyre and gimble: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > >> 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble:

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-10-01 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 01/10/12 09:42 did gyre and gimble: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble: >>> 1) people should fix 'make' to just allow `-j` without an argument

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-10-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble: > > 1) people should fix 'make' to just allow `-j` without an argument > > (seriously, dude ;^) ) > > Going dangerously off-topic, but two points: > > If you'

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-29 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble: > 1) people should fix 'make' to just allow `-j` without an argument > (seriously, dude ;^) ) Going dangerously off-topic, but two points: If you're using -j I've always gone under the impression you want the value to be #c

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 09/28/2012 01:09 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Peeters Simon >>> wrote: 2012/9/28 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All! Hello

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H > wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Peeters Simon >> wrote: >>> 2012/9/28 Peter Lemenkov : Hello All! >>> Hello >>> First question - is this a correct way to run syste

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Peeters Simon > wrote: >> 2012/9/28 Peter Lemenkov : >>> Hello All! >> Hello >> >>> First question - is this a correct way to run systemd --user? I saw a >>> "user@.service script" but it does requires roo

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Peeters Simon wrote: > 2012/9/28 Peter Lemenkov : >> Hello All! > Hello > >> First question - is this a correct way to run systemd --user? I saw a >> "user@.service script" but it does requires root permission to run. > this is afaik a correct way as long as a sing

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 09/28/2012 05:54 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > > 2012/9/28 Peeters Simon : >>> Second question - I've lost all /etc/profile stuff which was set up >>> somehow in the depths of Xorg-related script's swamp. I'd like to run >>> it (as well as some other shell scripts) and borrow its env

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! 2012/9/28 Peeters Simon : >> Second question - I've lost all /etc/profile stuff which was set up >> somehow in the depths of Xorg-related script's swamp. I'd like to run >> it (as well as some other shell scripts) and borrow its envvars (at >> least for some applications) - is it possib

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-09-28 Thread Peeters Simon
2012/9/28 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All! Hello > First question - is this a correct way to run systemd --user? I saw a > "user@.service script" but it does requires root permission to run. this is afaik a correct way as long as a single user does not have multiple sessions. > Second question - I'v