Am 27.11.24 um 09:55 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
SIGABRT has a pretty clear usecase: to abnormally terminate a program
while creating a coredump. It seems you want to redefine what SIGABRT
is supposed to do? That's quite problematic I would say. What's the
rationale for that?
Note that systemd
On Di, 26.11.24 12:06, Georg Müller (georgmuel...@gmx.net) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently trying to set up a 3-step kill mode for an application and
> this seems not possible with systemd.
>
> Here is the scenario I a trying to achieve:
>
> * on 'systemctl stop ...', the service should recei
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 8:06 AM Georg Müller wrote:
>
> * if, for some reason, the SIGABRT signal handler hangs,
>
So the signal handler is unsafe..see signal-safety(7) to know what you can
do and what you can't.
