Re: [systemd-devel] plymouthd integration

2010-12-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 26.11.10 16:43, Ozan Çağlayan (o...@pardus.org.tr) wrote: > Can't plymouthd be started as the very first service as possible (or is it > already)? Because the progress on my theme doesn't even progress at all ;) plymouth currently requires the video kmods to be loaded. I discussed this

Re: [systemd-devel] plymouthd integration

2010-12-25 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
On 25.12.2010 17:14, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 26.11.10 16:43, Ozan Çağlayan (o...@pardus.org.tr) wrote: Can't plymouthd be started as the very first service as possible (or is it already)? Because the progress on my theme doesn't even progress at all ;) plymouth currently requires

Re: [systemd-devel] Wildcards support for tmpfiles

2010-12-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 28.11.10 18:06, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > Here is actual snippet from rc.sysinit: > > # Clean up various /tmp bits > [ -n "$SELINUX_STATE" ] && restorecon /tmp > rm -f /tmp/.X*-lock /tmp/.lock.* /tmp/.gdm_socket /tmp/.s.PGSQL.* > rm -rf /tmp/.X*-unix /tmp/.ICE-unix /

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about 'vt100-nav' : unknown terminal type

2010-12-25 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Lennart Poettering Hi, | "vt100-nav" is the default TERM value that Fedora has been using for | serial terminals since about when time began. It's mostly vt100 plus | support for navigation keys. We hard-coded that into systemd under the | assumption that this ws universally available on Linu

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about 'vt100-nav' : unknown terminal type

2010-12-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 25.12.10 16:35, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote: > | I see little reason to deviate in this regard between distributions > | and hence I'd very much appreciate if a) Debian would adopt the same > | terminfo package as everybody else or b) we find an equally suitable > | default TERM

Re: [systemd-devel] plymouthd integration

2010-12-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 25.12.10 17:25, Ozan Çağlayan (o...@pardus.org.tr) wrote: > > On 25.12.2010 17:14, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >On Fri, 26.11.10 16:43, Ozan Çağlayan (o...@pardus.org.tr) wrote: > > > >> Can't plymouthd be started as the very first service as possible (or is it > >>already)? Because the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] path: do not watch IN_ATTRIB for parent directories

2010-12-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 01.12.10 15:39, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote: > IN_ATTRIB was added in commit 782195a3c31a79428874a32e0264c0aa97a664f7: > Author: Lennart Poettering > Date: Mon Nov 15 00:47:29 2010 +0100 > > path: always look for IN_ATTRIB since deletion is signalled that way >