'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 09/04/12 01:56 did gyre and gimble:
> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 09/04/12 00:29 did gyre and gimble:
>> Here we can see why prefdm doesn't get started. It was dropped as a dep
>> to break an ordering cycle. However, it's actually part of the cycle
>> its
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 22:02, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 21:59, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>>> It should be possible: selinux, lzma, z should not be needed. I think
>>> they just appeared in the systemd tree, and did
On 04/09/2012 08:06 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Yep, that works. Can the NAutoVTs be set differently on a per target basis?
Not as far as I know, but you should be able to do something similar via
a conflicts directive.
e.g. if you have NAutoVTs=6 by default you can just put:
Conflicts=autovt@tt
'Twas brillig, and Mark Hounschell at 10/04/12 13:36 did gyre and gimble:
> On 04/09/2012 08:06 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
>>> Yep, that works. Can the NAutoVTs be set differently on a per target
>>> basis?
>>
>> Not as far as I know, but you should be able to do something similar via
>> a conflic
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 14:36, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> I am having another issue with an out of kernel "GPL" device driver not
> being available "on time" so to say. When the kernel discovers this pci card
> it loads it's kernel module and sets up the card for use. This takes around
> 15 seconds
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Libattr and libcap are gone now from the tools which do not need them:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=d7832d2c6e0ef5f2839a2296c1cc2fc85c7d9632
Great! Thanks for slimming up my initramfs a bit :)
Daniel
_
On 04/10/2012 09:10 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 14:36, Mark Hounschell wrote:
I am having another issue with an out of kernel "GPL" device driver not
being available "on time" so to say. When the kernel discovers this pci card
it loads it's kernel module and sets up the card
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 16:26, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 09:10 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> We do not support any kernel device driver which does not create the
>> device nodes on its own from inside the kernel. Such drivers cause
>> problems and will fail for various non-interesting re
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 10/04/12 13:57 did gyre and gimble:
> 'Twas brillig, and Mark Hounschell at 10/04/12 13:36 did gyre and gimble:
>> On 04/09/2012 08:06 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>>
Yep, that works. Can the NAutoVTs be set differently on a per target
basis?
>>>
>>> Not as
A broken .include link in a unit file will cause 'systemctl
list-unit-files' to simply return 'No such file or directory'. Ignore
this silly error, since we know that the file really does exist.
---
Is there anything that can be done, short of enabling debug level logging, to
make hunting down erro
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:47:06 +0100
Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
> 2. When resolving ordering cycles, is it really right to delete the
> whole job? That's quite drastic action! While I can see the logic in NOT
> doing this, would it be better to simply drop a given ordering
> dependency, not the job it
On Tue, 10.04.12 03:06, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Heya,
> i have redirected "systemd-logind" messages for /var/log/messages
> to /var/log/secure on Fedora 16, but because they contain always
> an ID logwatch is flooded with this messages
systemd git now has logind log with th
Am 10.04.2012 22:23, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Tue, 10.04.12 03:06, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
>> i have redirected "systemd-logind" messages for /var/log/messages
>> to /var/log/secure on Fedora 16, but because they contain always
>> an ID logwatch is floo
On Fri, 06.04.12 21:37, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
> In the current code setting the return argument is never reached.
Ouch! Good catch! Applied! Thanks!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
systemd-devel mailing l
On 04/10/2012 10:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 16:26, Mark Hounschell wrote:
On 04/10/2012 09:10 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We do not support any kernel device driver which does not create the
device nodes on its own from inside the kernel. Such drivers cause
problems and wil
On Fri, 06.04.12 21:37, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
Heya,
> I sent this before, but I didn't get any comments. This is the same series
> rebased onto the current master.
> This patch series make the service property StartLimitAction writeable. The
> first two patches are prep
On Mon, 09.04.12 09:59, Mark Hounschell (ma...@compro.net) wrote:
>
> On 04/05/2012 05:23 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >'Twas brillig, and Mark Hounschell at 05/04/12 18:26 did gyre and gimble:
> >>I'm not a systemd developer but I am trying to use it in place of
> >>sysvinit to create a dedicated
On Thu, 05.04.12 20:01, Alex Bosworth (bwortha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I upgraded systemd to version 44 on my exherbo system and ever since
> Systemd fails at boot time.
>
> I've upgraded/reinstalled all the packages that install files to
> /etc/system/systemd and /lib/systemd and the directory /l
On Thu, 05.04.12 12:26, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >This is what we do in CUPS and what I think is a nice approach since it
> >basically means that any user configuration is always taken into
> >account.
>
> Unfortunately, this can't be used here. CUPS offers only one
> servic
19 matches
Mail list logo
