Re: [systemd-devel] Too little information is shown when system enters emergency mode

2012-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 à 15:59 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov a écrit : > > This issue comes up relatively often on openSUSE forums. Users > > complaint that when system drops in emergency, there is nothing that > > would explain user

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] vlan: set sysfs device_type to 'vlan'

2012-10-22 Thread Doug Goldstein
Sets the sysfs device_type to 'vlan' for udev. This makes it easier for applications that query network information via udev to identify vlans instead of using strrchr(). Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein --- Pre-patch output: swanson ~ # udevadm info -q all -p /sys/devices/virtual/net/br0.4 P: /dev

Re: [systemd-devel] [Lxc-users] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:06 +0100, John wrote: > On 22/10/12 03:06, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 02:53 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Michael H. Warfield > >> wrote: > >>> This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'in

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] rules: Remove HP iLO from USB HID PM rules

2012-10-22 Thread Tony Camuso
HP iLO fw versions below 1.50 incorrectly report that HP iLO virtual Kbd/Mouse supports remote wakeup. With the rules change in commit 3bfc7a97b1824fcdfb738617d9a5450a20a22a0f, the HP iLO was listed for power control. In iLO fw versions less than 1.50, the iLO Kbd/Mouse become unresponsive once t

Re: [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 21.10.12 17:25, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote: > Hello, > > This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'ing the > lxc-users community and the Fedora community on this for their input as > well. I know it's not always good to cross post between multipl

Re: [systemd-devel] pm-utils quirks

2012-10-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 22.10.12 15:20, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > Hi, Heya, > Might have been covered elsewhere in some docs but is there any info on > how to plan for a post-pm-utils world? Not really, the interesting bits of pm-utils are done by systemd in C code directly. pm-utils doesn'

Re: [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:11 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 21.10.12 17:25, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'ing the > > lxc-users community and the Fedora community on this for their in

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] systemd-bootchart: merge bootchart.

2012-10-22 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:01 -0700, Auke Kok wrote: > >> The goal of this patch is to get comments on the overall integration >> style. Man pages were added to cover the various ways of starting >> bootchart: >> >> - as replacement init proces

Re: [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 22.10.12 11:48, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote: > > > To summarize the problem... The LXC startup binary sets up various > > > things for /dev and /dev/pts for the container to run properly and this > > > works perfectly fine for SystemV start-up scripts and/or Upstart. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 22:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 22.10.12 11:48, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote: > > > > > To summarize the problem... The LXC startup binary sets up various > > > > things for /dev and /dev/pts for the container to run properly and this > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] pm-utils quirks

2012-10-22 Thread Colin Guthrie
Hi, 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 22/10/12 15:28 did gyre and gimble: >> Might have been covered elsewhere in some docs but is there any info on >> how to plan for a post-pm-utils world? > > Not really, the interesting bits of pm-utils are done by systemd in C > code directly. pm-utils

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] mount: make sure m->where is set before unit_add_exec_dependencies()

2012-10-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 16.10.12 17:04, Will Woods (wwo...@redhat.com) wrote: > If you enter unit_add_exec_dependencies with m->where = NULL, you'll > very likely end up aborting somewhere under socket_needs_mount. > > (When systemd goes to check to see if the journald socket requires your > mount, it'll do path

[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 195

2012-10-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya! A non-trivial amount of cool new features, but primarily bug fixes bug fixes bug fixes. Note that I intend to make this the final version we push into Fedora 18. systemd 196 will be the first release we commit to Fedora 19. This might or might not be a good idea for other distros to keep in