On 20/03/13 23:47, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
kdbus is entirely different from AF_BUS.
That's a step in wrong direction IMO. Sure it avoids the political
problems but it also means that it will be just another messaging
system, with hundreds of those already out there.
AFAIU the main selling
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:54 PM, William Douglas
wrote:
> BUILD_ID is a generic field that can uniquely identify all a
> distributions default packages in a release or image build
> when VERSION is used as broader identifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Douglas
> ---
> man/os-release.xml | 11 ++
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Maksim Melnikau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>>
>> We
>> also keep the app and OS containers in mind, right from the beginning,
>> i.e. that we can easily apply extra app policy on a bus for specific
>> processes and that w
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 20/03/13 18:48 did
gyre and gimble:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:43:17PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 15:23 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> This reverts commit v197-230-g652e737, because it broke parallel building.
>>> betwe
On Thursday 2013-03-21 15:58, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 20/03/13 18:48 did
>gyre and gimble:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:43:17PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 15:23 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
This reverts commit v197-23
Hi all,
in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809646 we noticed LSB
Provides can sometime be incorrectly handled (resulting in "Failed to
add LSB Provides name .service, ignoring: File exists" errors),
depending on initscript parsing order (if a provides is required by
another initscr
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:54 PM, William Douglas
> wrote:
>> BUILD_ID is a generic field that can uniquely identify all a
>> distributions default packages in a release or image build
>> when VERSION is used as broader identifier.
>>
>> Signe
Hi all,
on https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809820 we noted loopback
mountpoint could failed if systemd was trying to mount them before
systemd-udevd was started, since some static devices node wouldn't be
created in time.
This patches ensures local-fs-pre.target is started after syste
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:32:05PM +0100, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) wrote:
> From: "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)"
>
> The vacuum code used to stop vacuuming after one deletion, even
> when max_use was still exceeded.
Applied.
Zbyszek
___
syste
