Hi,
I have attached the rebased updated patch. I am working on git and I
can't run make all update-man-list. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22,
'Twas brillig, and Josh Triplett at 22/04/13 22:53 did gyre and gimble:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:24:56PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:26:15AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at
2013/4/23 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:24:56PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:26:15AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Josh
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Umut Tezduyar u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
I have attached the rebased updated patch.
Applied.
I am working on git and I can't
run make all update-man-list. Sorry for the trouble.
I just added it to your patch.
Thanks,
Kay
2013/4/23 Alexey Shabalin a.shaba...@gmail.com
2013/4/23 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:24:56PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:26:15AM +0200, Kay Sievers
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
1) Leave only root in /etc/passwd and /etc/group.
2) Add passwd.d and group.d directories in /etc and under /usr, which
accept one record per file (with name given by the filename) and
which do not include UIDs
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 22.04.2013 23:53, schrieb Josh Triplett:
1) Leave only root in /etc/passwd and /etc/group
why?
2) Add passwd.d and group.d directories in /etc and under /usr, which
accept one record per file (with name
Am 23.04.2013 13:33, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 22.04.2013 23:53, schrieb Josh Triplett:
1) Leave only root in /etc/passwd and /etc/group
why?
2) Add passwd.d and group.d directories in /etc and under /usr,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
More of this type of comments and you will have a problem posting on
this list. If you are unable to moderate your style yourself, I will
do that for you, no problem
sorry but you are hyper-sensible
I just have
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
tree prints a tree of the critical chain of units
$ ./systemd-analyze tree
graphical.target @1.226s
└─multi-user.target @1.226s
└─nfs-lock.service @961ms +265ms
└─rpcbind.service @958ms +1ms
└─network.target @957ms
└─NetworkManager.service
On Tue, 23.04.13 15:04, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
tree prints a tree of the critical chain of units
Really nice work! However, maybe the name tree is suboptimal? You
already say critical chain, maybe we should name it something like
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 22:10 -0400, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
xattrs on cgroup fs were added back in v3.6-rc3-3-g03b1cde. But
we support kernels = 2.6.39, and we also support kernels compiled
w/o xattr support, so it's better to fall back to mounting without
xattr support.
Yes this
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Otherwise, we get SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=python or something
similar, which is completely useless.
I think we shouldn't be creating one-off arguments for every possible
field someone might want to add, but
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
critical-chain prints a tree of the critical chain of units
$ ./systemd-analyze critical-chain
graphical.target @1.226s
└─multi-user.target @1.226s
└─nfs-lock.service @961ms +265ms
└─rpcbind.service @958ms +1ms
└─network.target @957ms
This patch escapes a unit name which was derived from udev.
Please imagine following udev rule.
ACTION==online|offline, TAG+=systemd,
ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}=muneda@%p.service
ACTION==online|offline, TAG+=systemd,
ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}=muneda@%r.service
ACTION==online|offline, TAG+=systemd,
Hi:
The journal's new SyncIntervalSec is cool when you are plugged to an
stable source of energy but it is not when on battery, where it will
wake up the disk .. could it be possible to skip it when
ConditionACPower=false ?
Cheers .
___
On Tue, 23.04.13 15:29, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
Hi:
The journal's new SyncIntervalSec is cool when you are plugged to an
stable source of energy but it is not when on battery, where it will
wake up the disk .. could it be possible to skip it when
From: Steven Hiscocks ste...@hiscocks.me.uk
---
Hi,
I thought it would be useful to have a version number in the python systemd
module.
I'm not overly familiar with Make, etc. but hopefully I've taken the right
approach. :)
Thanks
Steven Hiscocks
Makefile.am
Hello all
This change, which made mount propagation default to shared:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=b3ac5f8cb98757416d8660023d6564a7c411f0a0
and which went into Fedora 17 in January 2013:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:32AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
1) Leave only root in /etc/passwd and /etc/group.
Not commenting on the overall idea, but if you are going to do
something like this, at least allow
On 04/20/2013 08:04 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 18 apr. 2013, om 19:18 heeft George
McCollistergeorge.mccollis...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
On 04/10/2013 12:03 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
I have a bit of a heisenbug where dropbear.socket will just die and needs a
systemctl restart
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 06:54:55PM +0300, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Otherwise, we get SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=python or something
similar, which is completely useless.
I think we shouldn't be creating one-off
22 matches
Mail list logo
