On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:06 AM, poma wrote:
>
> systemd-networkd bridge dhcp OK
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=877526
Thanks for reporting back.
Cheers,
Tom
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://li
* On Friday, 21 March 2014 19:42, Greg KH wrote:
> Great, I suggest you try it out and see how it works. Patches are
> always gladly accepted.
I'm not so sure of that, but if you say so...
--
Benjamin SANS
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
Hello,
I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page and
ran it by:
systemd-nspawn -D/srv/mycontainer
I killed it by pkill systemd-nspaw (and not by poweroff from within the
container).
Now, running "machinectl" shows that the container still runs:
machinectl
MACHINE
On 03/21/2014 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> I've two questions:
>
> 1) Can we improve it in ordre to reduce the lock hold time ?
We don't consider that a very frequent operation, so we never thought
about optimizing this code path. What use case do you have in mind so
that performance would m
Introducing generic container parsing . Now supported for type
FLA_INFO_KIND and IFLA_VLAN_ID which can be extended to other
container parsing which is based on table based look up.
---
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-internal.h | 20 +
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c | 79
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> systemd does not need or use CONFIG_EFI_VARS anywhere, this should
> be CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS instead.
> ---
> README | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:58:21AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> > /* link into parent domain */
>> > if (parent) {
>>
>> What if 'parent' was already unrefed at this point? That can happen any
>> time as soon we give up the lock.
>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> I've two questions:
>>
>> 1) Can we improve it in ordre to reduce the lock hold time ?
>
> We don't consider that a very frequent operation, so we never thought
> about optimizing this code path.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> Also it seems that now there is only support for one level of nested
> >> domains? will this be increased?
> >
> > I don't think so. What's your use case here?
>
> We never trie
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> >> Also it seems that now there is only support for one level of nested
>> >> domains? will this be increased?
>> >
>> >
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 08:28:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> >> Also it seems that now there is only support for
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:35:19PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page and
> ran it by:
> systemd-nspawn -D/srv/mycontainer
>
> I killed it by pkill systemd-nspaw (and not by poweroff from within the
> container).
>
> Now, runni
Hi,
I tried again and now it did work.
maybe I was wrong somewhere, sorry.
KW
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:35:19PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page and
> > ran
It seems the journal is reading from /proc/pid/cmdline (argv[0]) for
each entry. So when reading using journalctl, we don't see process
title changes properly. See the below example:
#include
#include
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
printf("%d\n", prctl(PR_SET_NAME, "foo", 0, 0, 0));
14 matches
Mail list logo
