On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:06 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
systemd-networkd bridge dhcp OK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=877526
Thanks for reporting back.
Cheers,
Tom
___
systemd-devel mailing list
* On Friday, 21 March 2014 19:42, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Great, I suggest you try it out and see how it works. Patches are
always gladly accepted.
I'm not so sure of that, but if you say so...
--
Benjamin SANS
___
systemd-devel
Hello,
I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page and
ran it by:
systemd-nspawn -D/srv/mycontainer
I killed it by pkill systemd-nspaw (and not by poweroff from within the
container).
Now, running machinectl shows that the container still runs:
machinectl
MACHINE
On 03/21/2014 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
I've two questions:
1) Can we improve it in ordre to reduce the lock hold time ?
We don't consider that a very frequent operation, so we never thought
about optimizing this code path. What use case do you have in mind so
that performance would
Introducing generic container parsing . Now supported for type
FLA_INFO_KIND and IFLA_VLAN_ID which can be extended to other
container parsing which is based on table based look up.
---
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-internal.h | 20 +
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c | 79
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
systemd does not need or use CONFIG_EFI_VARS anywhere, this should
be CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS instead.
---
README | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:58:21AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
/* link into parent domain */
if (parent) {
What if 'parent' was already unrefed at this point? That can happen any
time as soon we give up the
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
On 03/21/2014 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
I've two questions:
1) Can we improve it in ordre to reduce the lock hold time ?
We don't consider that a very frequent operation, so we never thought
about optimizing this
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
Also it seems that now there is only support for one level of nested
domains? will this be increased?
I don't think so. What's your use case here?
We never
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
Also it seems that now there is only support for one level of nested
domains? will this
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 08:28:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
Also it seems that now
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:35:19PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
Hello,
I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page and
ran it by:
systemd-nspawn -D/srv/mycontainer
I killed it by pkill systemd-nspaw (and not by poweroff from within the
container).
Now, running
Hi,
I tried again and now it did work.
maybe I was wrong somewhere, sorry.
KW
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:35:19PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
Hello,
I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page
13 matches
Mail list logo
