Hi Zbyszek,
On 27 May 2014 04:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:46PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
When enabled in [Network] it will set up a dhcp server on the
interface, listening
on one of its statically configured IPv4 addresses and
2014-05-27 4:38 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:46PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
When enabled in [Network] it will set up a dhcp server on the interface,
listening
on one of its statically configured IPv4 addresses and with a fixed size
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-27 4:38 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:46PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
When enabled in [Network] it will set up a dhcp server on the interface,
listening
Hi
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-27 4:38 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
before looking at the code, a couple of general questions:
- does the DHCP server have to be part of networkd? Isn't the job
of acquiring
On Tue, 27.05.14 13:39, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-27 4:38 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
before looking at the code, a couple of general questions:
- does the
This causes the container to shut down cleanly when the service is
stopped.
---
units/systemd-nsp...@.service.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/units/systemd-nsp...@.service.in b/units/systemd-nsp...@.service.in
index ff36e90..6228345 100644
---
2014-05-27 14:00 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
In many ways, if people complain about a dhcp server in networkd, then
it's like complaining about the fact that pppd also can assign addresses
to the other side...
I don't see pppd implementing a DHCP server.
--
Why is
On 21.05.2014 10:03, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 18.05.14 19:36, Przemek Rudy (pru...@o2.pl) wrote:
diff --git a/src/core/automount.c b/src/core/automount.c
index 65e6d6f..d4359b9 100644
--- a/src/core/automount.c
+++ b/src/core/automount.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int
]] Lennart Poettering
If we set up links (and especially, create them like
we do for veth), then hel, yeah we should be prepared to make sure
everybody gets an address on it.
Should we also include BGP, OSPF, RIP, ISIS (and their IPv6 variants) to
make sure it's possible to push routes? I
Hi,
first of all I'd like to mark that I'm not sure if I'm writing in the
right place.
I have a problem with running a systemd service in capability-only
environment: I want to run a process with some caps (cap_sys_admin
cap_dac_override cap_mac_override) as a regular user (UID != 0).
My
Hi,
On 27/05/14 13:50, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:46PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
When enabled in [Network] it will set up a dhcp server on the interface,
listening
on one of its statically configured IPv4 addresses and with a fixed size
pool of
leases
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:12:56PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
Hi, all
In a pure initramfs enviroment, I want to mount a filesystem and I put
an mount entry in /etc/fstab, so that fstab-generator could generate a
mount unit and systemd will mount it at some time.
I have a question about mount
El 27/05/14 10:04, Eelco Dolstra escribió:
¿
That sounds reasonable. However, to be honest, I've never really understood why
networkd needs to be part of systemd in the first place.
For the start, to share a large amount code..
It seems to me that it
would work just as well as a separate
El 27/05/14 07:39, David Herrmann escribió:
I strongly disagree. One major example is Wifi-P2P which requires a
DHCP-Server for ad-hoc P2P connections.
OOk. that convinced me, thanks..
--
Cristian
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to
please everybody.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
If we set up links (and especially, create them like
we do for veth), then hel, yeah we should be prepared to make sure
everybody gets an address on it.
Should we also include BGP, OSPF, RIP, ISIS
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:37PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
---
src/libsystemd-network/dhcp-server-internal.h | 1 +
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-server.c | 13 +
src/libsystemd-network/test-dhcp-server.c | 17 +
src/systemd/sd-dhcp-server.h
I'm not sure this could be patch for below TODO.
* enabling an instance unit creates a pointless link, and
the unit will be started with getty@getty.service:
$ systemctl enable getty@.service
ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service'
---
src/core/manager.c | 10 ++
src/shared/unit-name.c | 12
src/shared/unit-name.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/core/manager.c
index 0cb2044..089df43 100644
--- a/src/core/manager.c
+++
]] Tom Gundersen
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
If we set up links (and especially, create them like
we do for veth), then hel, yeah we should be prepared to make sure
everybody gets an address on it.
Should we also
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
---
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-server.c | 81
++-
src/libsystemd-network/test-dhcp-server.c | 14 +++---
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 05/27/2014 03:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Tollef Fog Heentfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
If we set up links (and especially, create them like
we do for veth), then hel, yeah we should be prepared to make sure
everybody gets an address on it.
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:40PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
---
src/libsystemd-network/dhcp-server-internal.h | 3 +
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-server.c | 135
+-
src/libsystemd-network/test-dhcp-server.c | 37 +++
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:40PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
---
src/libsystemd-network/dhcp-server-internal.h | 3 +
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-server.c | 135
+-
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
---
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-server.c | 81
++-
src/libsystemd-network/test-dhcp-server.c | 14 +++---
2
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
---
Makefile.am | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index f2a3bbd..bea3876 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -4195,6 +4195,8 @@ endif
#
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:43PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Make sure we don't hand out the same IP twice. We still don't
handle lease expiry.
---
src/libsystemd-network/dhcp-server-internal.h | 25 -
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-server.c | 136
--
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 05:33:34PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:39:37PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
---
src/libsystemd-network/dhcp-server-internal.h | 1 +
On 05/27/2014 01:37 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 21.05.2014 10:03, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 18.05.14 19:36, Przemek Rudy (pru...@o2.pl) wrote:
diff --git a/src/core/automount.c b/src/core/automount.c
index 65e6d6f..d4359b9 100644
--- a/src/core/automount.c
+++ b/src/core/automount.c
The container usecase alone is already the reason why I am so very sure
I want this stuff, and that it needs to be in networkd, and just work. I
want this fully automatic, so that we can create a hundred of veth
tunnels, and trivially easy (simply by setting DHCPServer=yes for their
.network
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Michal Witanowski
m.witanow...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
first of all I'd like to mark that I'm not sure if I'm writing in the right
place.
I have a problem with running a systemd service in capability-only
environment: I want to run a process with some caps
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen pho...@gmail.com
Reuses logic from service.c and the rc-local generator.
Note that this drops reading of chkconfig entirely. It also drops reading
runlevels from the LSB headers. The runlevels were only used to check for
runlevels outside of the normal 1-5
2014-05-28 1:12 GMT+02:00 Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com:
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen pho...@gmail.com
Reuses logic from service.c and the rc-local generator.
Note that this drops reading of chkconfig entirely. It also drops reading
runlevels from the LSB headers. The
Am 27.05.2014 20:14, schrieb Kirill Elagin:
The container usecase alone is already the reason why I am so very sure
I want this stuff, and that it needs to be in networkd, and just work. I
want this fully automatic, so that we can create a hundred of veth
tunnels, and
Hi,
I'm running Arch and recently upgraded system, now every time I boot I
see a dead service: rfkill1
systemd-rfkill@rfkill0.service loaded active
exitedLoad/Save RF Kill Switch Status of rfkill0
● systemd-rfkill@rfkill1.service loaded failed
failed
El 27/05/14 20:14, Peeters Simon escribió:
this feels wrong, the native unit should override the sysv one.
Is there any reason why you want to change this?
Couldn't you just use arg_dest = argv[3]; instead?
This behaviour is probably my only objection to the idea in question,
the generated
Hi,
On Wed, 28 May 2014 08:25:52 +0800
Aaron Lewis the.warl0ck.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Arch and recently upgraded system, now every time I boot I
see a dead service: rfkill1
systemd-rfkill@rfkill0.service loaded active
exitedLoad/Save RF Kill Switch
On Wed, 12.02.14 09:46, Stef Walter (s...@thewalter.net) wrote:
heya!
I finally merged this patch. Sorry for the delay!
I wasn't sure about the rationale, but this appears to be the right
thing to do after all, so I merged it!
Thank you!
Lennart
It is almost always incorrect to allow DHCP
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:12:23AM +0200, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen pho...@gmail.com
Reuses logic from service.c and the rc-local generator.
Note that this drops reading of chkconfig entirely.
How likely is this to cause regressions in existing
On Tue, 27.05.14 14:28, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014-05-27 14:00 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
In many ways, if people complain about a dhcp server in networkd, then
it's like complaining about the fact that pppd also can assign addresses
to the
On Tue, 27.05.14 16:04, Eelco Dolstra (eelco.dols...@logicblox.com) wrote:
I am very sure this should be in networkd.
[snip]
That sounds reasonable. However, to be honest, I've never really understood
why
networkd needs to be part of systemd in the first place. It seems to
me that it
One of the cleanest ways to do what you want is to create a
D-Bus-activated systemd service (or socket-activated, if that's more
appropriate). That allows activation completely outside the user's
session without elevated privileges. Of course, it requires
considerable work for each service to do
Is there a downside to using KillMode=mixed instead?
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On 28 May 2014 13:36, David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Is there a downside to using KillMode=mixed instead?
I suspect one downside is that if the container takes longer than the
timeout to shutdown then it will go on a SIGKILL-ing spree... which
could be a problem if a
On May 28, 2014 3:25 AM, Aaron Lewis the.warl0ck.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Arch and recently upgraded system, now every time I boot I
see a dead service: rfkill1
systemd-rfkill@rfkill0.service loaded active
exitedLoad/Save RF Kill Switch Status of
44 matches
Mail list logo
