Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] shorten_uuid: use proper table size

2014-06-11 Thread Maciej Wereski
10.06.2014 at 19:20 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 28.05.14 11:24, Maciej Wereski (m.were...@partner.samsung.com) wrote: When the function is called the buffer is filled with 36 chars, and we then strip the non-hex-chars, so that 34 chars result. But the function

Re: [systemd-devel] HandleLidSwitch v204

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 09.06.14 23:09, Justin Brown (justin.br...@fandingo.org) wrote: I need to run Fedora 19 (systemd 204) for a particular piece of software on a laptop, and I'm having trouble disabling suspend when I shut the screen. My default target is multi-user.target, and the laptop is not

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: Fix journal file permissions broken by a606871

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 09.06.14 20:05, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) (jan.steff...@gmail.com) wrote: They shouldn't be executable nor world-readable. I have now committed a different set of patches to clean this up for good:

Re: [systemd-devel] Soliciting feedback for golang bindings to the systemd journal C API

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 10.06.14 10:13, Brandon Philips (bran...@ifup.co) wrote: Can you please point me to the implementation? All I've seen is this: https://github.com/coreos/go-systemd/blob/master/journal/send.go Which only handles writes via the Unix socket. The implementation we're

[systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-11 Thread David . Yates
Hi, We have written a component that detects failing units in the system. This registers for the PropertiesChanged signal, to be notified whenever the ActiveState of a unit changes. However this signal is sent without the property values. This can result in a problem when a unit is

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add a network-pre.target to avoid firewall leaks

2014-06-11 Thread Rusty Bird
Hi Lennart, However, if we do this, then this needs to be a passive target, see systemd.special(7), under Special passive system units, and it should be documented in that section. Passive means it is pulled it by the units that implement a pre job, not by the units that implement the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add a network-pre.target to avoid firewall leaks

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 10.06.14 22:16, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: 2014-06-10 19:44 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net: I figure we don't really need network-pre.target, as units that want to run before the network is up should just use:

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add a network-pre.target to avoid firewall leaks

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 11.06.14 10:18, Rusty Bird (rustyb...@openmailbox.org) wrote: Hi Lennart, However, if we do this, then this needs to be a passive target, see systemd.special(7), under Special passive system units, and it should be documented in that section. Passive means it is pulled it by the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] doc: specify kernel configs for cpushares

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 10.06.14 23:29, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote: Applied! Thanks! --- README |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/README b/README index f01087f..011c7f6 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ REQUIREMENTS:

Re: [systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-11 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
Hmm, didn't this get fixed in recent versions? I seem to remember that after the sd-bus port systemd started sending changed_properties with values, not just invalidated_properties... -- Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com // sent from phone On Jun 11, 2014 12:59 PM,

[systemd-devel] systemd not initializing

2014-06-11 Thread Jay D Bhatt
Hi, I am working on the Freescale hardware. I am using u-boot and uImage provided with hardware. When I try to boot the Tizen on my board, It boots u-boot and kernel uImage loads fine. But it stops at Freeing Init Memory: 244k and does not do anything. I wanted to know how does the kernel

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add a network-pre.target to avoid firewall leaks

2014-06-11 Thread Rusty Bird
Lennart Poettering: I am not convinced that the firewall being broken should break the boot. It shouldn't! But there should be at least an option (arguably the default) to break *connectivity*. With the v1-v3 patches that's decided by the firewall service, which chooses if it is RequiredBy=,

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd not initializing

2014-06-11 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Jay D Bhatt jay.bh...@igate.com wrote: Hi, I am working on the Freescale hardware. I am using u-boot and uImage provided with hardware. When I try to boot the Tizen on my board, It boots u-boot and kernel uImage loads fine. But it stops at “Freeing Init

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add a network-pre.target to avoid firewall leaks

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 11.06.14 11:13, Rusty Bird (rustyb...@openmailbox.org) wrote: Lennart Poettering: I am not convinced that the firewall being broken should break the boot. It shouldn't! But there should be at least an option (arguably the default) to break *connectivity*. well, but that's better

Re: [systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 11.06.14 13:43, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: Hmm, didn't this get fixed in recent versions? I seem to remember that after the sd-bus port systemd started sending changed_properties with values, not just invalidated_properties... This is indeed the case. In more recent

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] NEWS: fix directory name

2014-06-11 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
--- NEWS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 54d9e9e..1effaf5 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ CHANGES WITH 214: transports. Instead it is assumed the kernel loads them automatically when required. This only

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add a network-pre.target to avoid firewall leaks

2014-06-11 Thread Rusty Bird
Lennart Poettering: On Wed, 11.06.14 11:13, Rusty Bird (rustyb...@openmailbox.org) wrote: Lennart Poettering: I am not convinced that the firewall being broken should break the boot. It shouldn't! But there should be at least an option (arguably the default) to break *connectivity*.

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: Fix journal file permissions broken by a606871

2014-06-11 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:53:53AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 09.06.14 20:05, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) (jan.steff...@gmail.com) wrote: They shouldn't be executable nor world-readable. I have now committed a different set of patches to clean this up for good:

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-network-wait-online symlinks to systemd-networkd

2014-06-11 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Dave Reisner at 10/06/14 18:10 did gyre and gimble: Traditional configuration files have their own content. They can be hashed and tracked by your package manager. On upgrade, you can make an intelligent decision about what to do with the new file (replace, ignore, merge)

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-network-wait-online symlinks to systemd-networkd

2014-06-11 Thread Kirill Elagin
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Tue, 10.06.14 13:58, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote: Symlinks should probably just be considered different type of file,

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] connection: fix cpu stall by checking kdbus item alignment

2014-06-11 Thread Djalal Harouni
Fix the following stall triggered by a policy holder hello: call test/kdbus-util.c:kdbus_hello_registrar() and pass KDBUS_HELLO_POLICY_HOLDER as a flag. While we are it make sure that kdbus_cmd_conn_update() also checks for proper 8 byte alignment. [ 142.731011] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] kdbus-test: fix kdbus item alignment in kdbus_hello_registrar()

2014-06-11 Thread Djalal Harouni
Currently running the test-kdbus-activator test will fail with -EINVAL To fix this, remove the redundant offsetof() macros since it is already handled. The KDBUS_ITEM_SIZE() will expand into KDBUS_ITEM_HEADER_SIZE() which expands into an offsetof() one. Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] connection: fix cpu stall by checking kdbus item alignment

2014-06-11 Thread Djalal Harouni
Hi, The tests are not clean... just a copy/past if you want to confirm this one! they are attached. patch with policy-holder.patch then run: test-kdbus-policy-holder You should hit it! On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:27:58PM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote: Fix the following stall triggered by a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] NEWS: fix directory name

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 11.06.14 17:09, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: Ah, grrr. Didn't see your mail before the release. :-( Anyway, commited now! Thanks! --- NEWS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 54d9e9e..1effaf5 100644 --- a/NEWS

Re: [systemd-devel] How to Restrict device in systemd?

2014-06-11 Thread Kirill Elagin
By the way, reading throw the NEWS I thought you might be interested in `InaccessibleDirectories=/` or something like that -- Кирилл Елагин On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Mohit Agrawal moagr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Thanks to share the example of unit file,now query is resolved.

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 214

2014-06-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
11.06.2014 23:00, Lennart Poettering wrote: CHANGES WITH 214: * As an experimental feature, udev now tries to lock the disk device node (flock(LOCK_SH|LOCK_NB)) while it executes events for the disk or any of its partitions. Applications like

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] tests: add missing XDG_RUNTIME_DIR env variable

2014-06-11 Thread Ronny Chevalier
Otherwise the test fails because specifier_runtime() returns -ENOTSUP when XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not set. --- src/test/test-unit-name.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/test/test-unit-name.c b/src/test/test-unit-name.c index fff3e16..bff4319 100644 ---

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-network-wait-online symlinks to systemd-networkd

2014-06-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Tue, 10.06.14 13:58, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org)

[systemd-devel] Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-11 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
Hi all, I would like to share a my experience about a slowness of systemd when used on BTRFS. My boot time was very high (about ~50 seconds); most of time it was due to NetworkManager which took about 30-40 seconds to start (this data came from systemd-analyze plot). I make several attempts

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-network-wait-online symlinks to systemd-networkd

2014-06-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-network-wait-online symlinks to systemd-networkd

2014-06-11 Thread Kirill Elagin
You're welcome. Please, tell the PMS guys to add this to the spec and ask the Paludis guys to implement this as well. -- Кирилл Елагин On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed,

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] shared: fix searching for configs in alternate roots

2014-06-11 Thread Michael Marineau
Commit 12ed81d9 changed path_strv_canonicalize_absolute's behavior to return a directory list without the root prefix if one was given but did not update other users of the function to the new behavior. This broke the --root option in systemd-tmpfiles, a regression in v213. To better reflect that

Re: [systemd-devel] Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-11 Thread Chris Murphy
On Jun 11, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it wrote: If someone is able to suggest me how FRAGMENT the log file, I can try to collect more scientific data. So long as you're not using compression, filefrag will show you fragments of systemd-journald journals. I can

Re: [systemd-devel] Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-11 Thread Chris Murphy
On Jun 11, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: Hi all, I would like to share a my experience about a slowness of systemd when used on BTRFS. My boot time was very high (about ~50 seconds); most of

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 214

2014-06-11 Thread Cameron Norman
El Wed, 11 de Jun 2014 a las 10:00 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net escribió: Hi! http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-214.tar.xz Here it is, version 214. Stuffed with great new features, improvements in all areas, ‘1’ I would think that removing m from the

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd not initializing

2014-06-11 Thread Jay D Bhatt
Hi Mantas, Thanks for your reply. I tried putting boot options boot options loglevel=6, systemd.log_level=debug But it got stuck as before. So I added init=/bin/sh to the arguments and removed system.log_level=debug. Then I could have the Shell command line but it gave some messages before