On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:05:05PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> This avoids errors like this, when the paths are already there with the
> correct permissions and owner:
>
> chmod(/var/spool) failed: Read-only file system
Ping. These warnings are rather annoying and they make it hard to find
th
We always read system uptime before log start time. So the uptime
should be always smaller number, except it includes system suspend
time. It seems better to ask for --rel and exit() than try to be
smart and try to recovery from this situation or generate huge
messy graphs.
---
src/bootchart/bootc
* systemd-bootchart always parses /proc/uptime, although the
information is unnecessary when --rel specified
* use /proc/uptime is overkill, since Linux 2.6.39 we have
clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, ...). The backend on kernel side is
get_monotonic_boottime() in both cases.
* main() uses "if
On 07/31/2014 12:41 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2014-07-30 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
"ExecStopPre" would be better suited as the pre-restart check because
it would achieve the goal and also prevent stop a service until it's
configuration is fixed - that catchs cases where you stop something
Am 31.07.2014 um 07:03 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 07/31/2014 12:16 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> I think the use case is pretty clear tho'. Config (or general machine
>> state) has transitioned from working to broken in the time since the
>> service was started and while it's really not a n
Am 31.07.2014 um 02:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> 2014-07-30 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>> "ExecStopPre" would be better suited as the pre-restart check because
>> it would achieve the goal and also prevent stop a service until it's
>> configuration is fixed - that catchs cases where you stop s
On Jul 31, 2014 12:57 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
> Am 31.07.2014 um 02:16 schrieb Colin Guthrie:
> > Reindl Harald wrote on 30/07/14 13:34:
> >> *how* should that both help in calling "apachectl -t" *before* stop the
> >> service and in case of a error-repsonse keep it running?
> >
> > Note, just
intltool is needed for nls _and_ polkit, thus the check needs to be
changed to do the test whenever one of them is enables.
Without this build fails when configured with
--disable-nls --enable-polkit
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac
On 31/07/14 15:18, Robert Schiele wrote:
> intltool is needed for nls _and_ polkit, thus the check needs to be
> changed to do the test whenever one of them is enables.
>
> Without this build fails when configured with
> --disable-nls --enable-polkit
> ---
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> 1 file changed,
Hello all,
I'm trying to start from an udev rule a templated systemd unit, whose instance
should be a properly escaped device node path (so that %i.device would represent
an existing unit). Which udev specifier should I use for this?
Or, in more clear wording:
given the rule:
ACTION=="add", ...
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:37:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 31/07/14 15:18, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > intltool is needed for nls _and_ polkit, thus the check needs to be
> > changed to do the test whenever one of them is enables.
> >
> > Without this build fails when configured with
>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni
> ---
> test/test-kdbus-policy.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> This series adds the infrastructure to test and upload multiple
> policies.
>
> The last #5 patch allows to upload multiple policies per connection
What is the reason for this? A policy holding connection (which
matches a busname unit) shou
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Kevin Wells wrote:
> SYSTEMD_READY is currently set to 0 for all loop devices (loop[0-9]*)
> that do not have a backing_file. Partitioned loop devices (ex. loop0p1),
> however, are matched by this rule and excluded by systemd even though
> they are active devices.
(Cc'ed Lennart)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:40:53PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > This series adds the infrastructure to test and upload multiple
> > policies.
> >
> > The last #5 patch allows to upload multiple policies per connection
>
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> (Cc'ed Lennart)
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:40:53PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> > This series adds the infrastructure to test and upload multiple
>> > policies.
>> >
>> > The las
I suggested something like this in [1] but in the end a systemd-escape
utility was added [2].
Since you can't use ENV to set dynamic variables, you might do that
via a RUN rule instead.
HTH,
Michael
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747044#25
[2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Isn't this scenario already covered by this existing configure.ac test...
>
> AS_IF([test -z "$INTLTOOL_POLICY_RULE"], [
> # If intltool is not available, provide a dummy rule to fail
> generation of %.policy files with a meaningful err
18 matches
Mail list logo
