[systemd-devel] [PATCH] bus-bloom: Fix bloom filter calculation

2014-08-09 Thread Denis Kenzior
i is being used incorrectly. It is used to refer to the number of indexes calculated so far (out of k). However, it is also incremented when a new hash key is being used. This means that the results are inconsistent with the desired behavior described in PORTING-DBUS1 document. The expected res

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: warn instead of killing kmod loading

2014-08-09 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was > to introduce a timeout send to hell drivers that are not using > asynch firmware loading. That commit actually would not have > triggered in full effect on udev's usage of kmod

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: warn instead of killing kmod loading

2014-08-09 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez > wrote: > > The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was > > to introduce a timeout send to hell drivers that are not using > > asynch firmware loading. That commit act

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-09 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:40:40 +0200 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0200, har...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Harald Hoyer > > > > According to Brent Baude , who provided the patch, > > IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all. > Th

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Added arch tuple for PPC64LE

2014-08-09 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 08.08.2014 16:56, har...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Harald Hoyer > > Thanks to Brent Baude , who checked with the debian > guys, that this is correct and provided the patch. > --- > src/shared/architecture.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/shared/a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: warn instead of killing kmod loading

2014-08-09 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > wrote: > > > The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was > > > to introduce a timeout send to

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2] udev: warn instead of killing kmod loading

2014-08-09 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was to introduce a timeout for drivers that are not using asynch firmware loading. That commit actually would not have triggered in full effect on udev's usage of kmod for module loading until commit 786235ee was m

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: warn instead of killing kmod loading

2014-08-09 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> > wrote: >> > > The purpose of commit e64fae55

[systemd-devel] systemd-resolved cannot survive router reinstall

2014-08-09 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi I have a router where I experiment with OpenWRT. I sysupdate (i.e. reinstall) openwrt regularly, once or twice a week. I also have an Arch home server with the latest systemd. The machine connected via ethernet cable. Every time I reboot router it looses information about current DHCP leases a

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolved cannot survive router reinstall

2014-08-09 Thread Leonid Isaev
Hi, On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:59:30AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > I have a router where I experiment with OpenWRT. I sysupdate (i.e. > reinstall) openwrt regularly, once or twice a week. I also have an > Arch home server with the latest systemd. The machine connected via > ethernet cab