Re: [systemd-devel] Switch root slowness

2014-10-31 Thread Jan Synacek
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes: On Thu, 30.10.14 14:35, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: I wish there was a way how we could use getrandom() in a way like /dev/urandom, where we can pull out the non-initialized data anyway. In absence of that we can just

Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs ordering, iSCSI and _netdev

2014-10-31 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:04:59PM -0700, Chris Leech wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:10:16PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 02:29:35AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 27.10.14 14:10, Chris Leech (cle...@redhat.com) wrote: So for any mounts to remote block

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Bootchart: use /proc/pid/mountinfo for root bdev

2014-10-31 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 07:51:59AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote: 2014-10-31 3:06 GMT+03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:45:53PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote: Good time of day, list. I have try to fix Fixme in svg.c: /* FIXME: this works only

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tests: add tests for fileio.c

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Gundersen
Applied. Thanks! Tom On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Ronny Chevalier chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote: add tests for the following functions: - write_string_file_no_create - load_env_file_pairs --- src/test/test-fileio.c | 63 ++ 1 file

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] remove references of readahead

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Gundersen
Applied. Thanks! Tom On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Ronny Chevalier chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote: --- .gitignore | 1 - README | 1 - TODO | 7 --- 3 files changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 0b71f09..14f1691 100644 --- a/.gitignore

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tests: add tests for strv.c

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Gundersen
Applied. Thanks! Tom On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Ronny Chevalier chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote: add tests for: - strv_find_startswith - strv_push_prepend - strv_consume_prepend --- src/test/test-strv.c | 39 +++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/4] shared: add missing includes

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Gundersen
Applied all four. Thanks! Tom On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Ronny Chevalier chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote: --- src/shared/copy.h| 3 +++ src/shared/locale-util.h | 4 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/shared/copy.h b/src/shared/copy.h index

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] shared: fix typo

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Gundersen
Applied. Thanks! Tom On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Ronny Chevalier chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote: --- src/shared/capability.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/shared/capability.c b/src/shared/capability.c index d2b9013..0226542 100644 ---

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] shared/install: avoid prematurely rejecting missing units

2014-10-31 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:04:53AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 08:28:14PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: f7101b7368df copied some logic to prevent enabling masked units, but also added a check which causes attempts to enable templated units to fail. Since

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Bootchart: use /proc/pid/mountinfo for root bdev

2014-10-31 Thread Timofey Titovets
2014-10-31 11:57 GMT+03:00 Karel Zak k...@redhat.com: somewhere in systemd code is mountinfo parser.. or see https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/blob/master/libmount/src/tab_parse.c#L124 it seems you also want to read:

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v4] Bootchart: use /proc/pid/mountinfo for root bdev

2014-10-31 Thread Timofey Titovets
Good time of day, list. I have try to fix Fixme in svg.c: /* FIXME: this works only in the simple case */ // By default function try to get only root=/dev/* I rewrite to parse /proc/self/mountinfo This only support root device like /dev/???* I can't support LVM/Luks etc, i'm not using these

[systemd-devel] statelessy system

2014-10-31 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Hello. I am working to upgrade systemd in Tizen to v217 from v212. To verify rpm packages we use rpmlint with some rules from opensuse[1]. For whatever reason v217 package exceed allowed badness because it puts config files (system.conf, journald.conf etc) in /etc/systemd. The check [2] forbids

Re: [systemd-devel] starting Oracle with systemd

2014-10-31 Thread Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon)
-Original Message- How about: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.kill.html Would setting KillMode=process for the listener service have the required effect: on service stop, only kill the main process, leaving the child processes and cgroup running? Yes,

Re: [systemd-devel] starting Oracle with systemd

2014-10-31 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:20:02 -0400 Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon) charles.fis...@alcoa.com пишет: -Original Message- How about: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.kill.html Would setting KillMode=process for the listener service have the required

Re: [systemd-devel] starting Oracle with systemd

2014-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2014 um 17:47 schrieb Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon): From: Andrei Borzenkov [mailto:arvidj...@gmail.com] I know. So define service that starts listener, use lsnrctl start as ExecStart, lsnrctl stop as ExecStop and set KillMode=process (or none). What exactly does not work in this

Re: [systemd-devel] starting Oracle with systemd

2014-10-31 Thread Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon)
-Original Message- From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald For some reason, the iptables didn't happen. Maybe it needs to be fully qualified. yes it needs to be as any other path the documentation is very clear here No,

Re: [systemd-devel] starting Oracle with systemd

2014-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon): From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald For some reason, the iptables didn't happen. Maybe it needs to be fully qualified. yes it needs to be as any other path the

Re: [systemd-devel] starting Oracle with systemd

2014-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2014 um 18:10 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 31.10.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon): From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald For some reason, the iptables didn't happen. Maybe it needs to be fully

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-dhcp6-client: fix off-by-two error in DUID length

2014-10-31 Thread Dan Williams
The duid data passed by the caller does not include the DUID type, but sd_dhcp6_client_set_duid() was treating it like it did. --- src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp6-client.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp6-client.c

[systemd-devel] shutdown

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Deblauwe
Hello, I'm using systemd, but can't seem to correctly shutdown. I have already: - checked: reboot -f works - enabled the debug-shell on vt9 So I was hoping to issue the systemctl list-jobs command from the debug shell, however, it didn't allow me to type in commands. The debug shell allows

[systemd-devel] Minimal Userland

2014-10-31 Thread Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon)
Posting just in case someone finds it of interest. I did this on Oracle Linux 7. mkdir /home/nifty mkdir /home/nifty/bin cp /your/busybox /home/nifty/bin cd /home/nifty/bin ln -s busybox sh chroot /home/nifty bin/busybox ls -l #so far, so good, any system can do this exit ./busybox --list

Re: [systemd-devel] Luks + lvm in initrd, tracking the issue

2014-10-31 Thread Luca Bruno
I've tracked down the issue a little. sysroot.mount requires/after dev-vg-lv.device. System start, dev-vg-lv is inactive. vgchange -a y - dev-vg-lv active. vgchange -a n - dev-vg-lv inactive. At this point, unit-job of dev-vg-lv is NULL (sometimes also happens when I don't run vgchange, but I

Re: [systemd-devel] Luks + lvm in initrd, complete scenario

2014-10-31 Thread Luca Bruno
Sorry for the spam. Further tracking down the issue. I think I've come to a conclusion of the scenario: S1.service requires/after D.device and S2.service S1 is activating, thus starts D and S2 S2 starts, which activates D and deactivates D A can now start because D has no job running [1], but D