Hi guys,
I'm not exactly sure if I'm asking the right question in the right
place, please let me know if this is not the right place for this question.
I'm setting up SR-IOV for my Intel I350 igb on CentOS 6.6
(2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64, udev 147) using udev. I have modified a rule I
used in Cen
Looks good. Pushed all four.
Zbyszek
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:56:57AM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> - report actual load error for units which could not be loaded
> - make unit_find_paths() report all kinds of errors it encounters
> (for consistency)
> - consistently handle not-found errors
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:46:10PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> One would expect pressing the button to go to an overview / show
> applications mode, we thus map it to leftmeta, the Windows key.
>
> See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658602#c17
Applied.
Zbyszek
> KEYBOARD_KEY_6c
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:53:20PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> [grr, accidentally dropped the mailing list on my previous reply]
>
> 2015-02-04 21:48 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 21:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> 2015-02-04 2:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poet
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 00:47 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 03.02.2015 18:43, David Herrmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
> >> On 02.02.2015 19:58, David Herrmann wrote:
> >>> As I'm not really interested in hacking on network-managers, I've
> >>> decided to stop work
> That indicates that the systemd or apache inside the container do not
> correctly make use of the the socket passed into them. You need to
> make sure that inside the container you have pretty much the same
> .socket unit running as on the host. The ListStream lines must be
> identical, so that s
On 2015-01-28 at 22:29 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On 2015-01-28 at 20:15 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sun, 18.01.15 04:21, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to fix this bug:
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
- correctly check for local vs. remote transport
- return after receiving error from expand_names()
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 083b618..567b467 100644
--- a/src/
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 567b467..384ae02 100644
--- a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
+++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
@@ -4578,7 +4578,7 @@ static
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 63 ++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 384ae02..2d70ff1 100644
--- a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
+++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
@@
- report actual load error for units which could not be loaded
- make unit_find_paths() report all kinds of errors it encounters
(for consistency)
- consistently handle not-found errors in cat() and edit()
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 54 +++
1 file
On 02/04/2015 09:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> >Hey,
> >
> >Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
> > >Well, but their enablement stat
Hello!
Does it possible to create container as regular user? Oh what capabilities
i need to add to create container not using root?
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists
Hi again,
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 19:00 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've recently been using systemd-networkd to great success on a few of
> my machines here. However I ran into an interesting problem on at least
> 2 machines so far. I've included the output of journal for
> systemd-ne
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 21:57 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> OK, let's try this again, with an example:
>
> a) you have one service mydaemon.service
>
> b) you have a preparation service called
>mydaemon-convert-config.service that takes config from somewhere,
>converts it into a suitab
Am 04.02.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 04.02.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
OK, let's try this again, with an example:
a) you have one service mydaemon.service
b) you have a preparation service
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Patrik Flykt
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 17:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > Is the resume event detected somehow in systemd?
>>
>> The kernel unfortunately provides no API for this right now. However,
>> if logind is the one suspending
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> Am 04.02.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >OK, let's try this again, with an example:
> >
> >a) you have one service mydaemon.service
> >
> >b) you have a preparation service called
> >mydaemon-convert-config.se
Am 04.02.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
OK, let's try this again, with an example:
a) you have one service mydaemon.service
b) you have a preparation service called
mydaemon-convert-config.service that takes config from somewhere,
converts it into a suitable format for myda
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
> > > Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
> > > drop i
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 22:02 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 21:26, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> > Isn't this change also relevant to the creation of .wants symlinks, and
> > avoiding generating .wants links from the wrong targets?
> >
> > As in, the case where
2015-02-04 22:01 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> But if you have a native unit, I think it's rather unexpected if you
>> disable it with systemctl, enable it in sysv, but still get it
>> started.
>
> I'd claim the opposite. Let's say you have foobar.rpm installed in one
> version that only carrie
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:26, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
> > > Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
> > > drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv scri
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
> > Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
> > drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
> > enabled, but the former not
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:10, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:36 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 20:19, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> > > You're missing an essential point here: there's a distinction between
> > > skipping re
[grr, accidentally dropped the mailing list on my previous reply]
2015-02-04 21:48 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Wed, 04.02.15 21:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> 2015-02-04 2:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> > On Wed, 04.02.15 02:05, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrot
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:36 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 20:19, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> > You're missing an essential point here: there's a distinction between
> > skipping reloads for services which have not not been dispatched, and
> > skipping reload
2015-02-04 13:42 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
>> optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
>> creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
>> they are put into genera
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
> > Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
> > drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
> > enabled, but the former not, then systemd currently
On Wed, 04.02.15 20:19, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 16:38 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 15:25, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> > > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:27 +0100]:
> > > > On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 16:38 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 15:25, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:27 +0100]:
> > > On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> > > > - Don't enqueue a reload if the serv
One would expect pressing the button to go to an overview / show
applications mode, we thus map it to leftmeta, the Windows key.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658602#c17
---
hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hwdb/60-keyb
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:24:13PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 18:18, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.p
On Wed, 04.02.15 18:18, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:40, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Le 04/02/2015 17:10, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> >On Wed, 04.02.15 17:05, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> >
> >>Hey,
> >>
> >>I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As per
> >>IRC disc
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c |4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed,
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c |4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > New commits:
> > commit 7e3254b3bae19
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:50:29PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le 04/02/2015 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
>
> Thanks again for the quick review! Fixed if not commented (sorry,
> some issues were back due to the refactoring).
> >On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Didier Roch
Le 04/02/2015 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
Thanks again for the quick review! Fixed if not commented (sorry, some
issues were back due to the refactoring).
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
+typedef struct Clients {
+struct Manager *manager;
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 16:38 +0100]:
> Sure, I can only recommend again: in the the glue code that calls out
> to "systemctl" from "service", you can add the code to use --no-block
> or --job-mode=ignore-dependencies , if you notice you are in shutdown
> mode...
Yeah, I agree that given al
Le 04/02/2015 17:10, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:05, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As per
IRC discussion, (and after giving up the busy loop for a rewrite with
epool), I did rebase it ag
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
> +typedef struct Clients {
> +struct Manager *manager;
> +int fd;
> +dev_t devnum;
> +size_t cur;
> +size_t max;
> +int pass;
> +double percent;
> +size_t buflen;
> +
> +
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:05, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As per
> IRC discussion, (and after giving up the busy loop for a rewrite with
> epool), I did rebase it again on sd_event.
>
> I'm only proposing th
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c |4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 7e3254b3bae19221afefdb87b61ff92c755fd2f4
> Author: Lennart Poettering
> Date: Wed Feb 4 17:00:23 2015
Hey,
I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As
per IRC discussion, (and after giving up the busy loop for a rewrite
with epool), I did rebase it again on sd_event.
I'm only proposing there up for review the 2 first patches (without
plymouth communication, cance
>From 74291bace60f64efb96287f8170df4c38058cc46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Didier Roche
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:42:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fsckd daemon for inter-fsckd communication
Add systemd-fsckd multiplexer which accepts multiple systemd-fsck
instances to connect to it and sends
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:50:01PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
> info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
> visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
> try to set the overridden value.
> ---
> src/sy
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:29, Olaf Leidinger (ol...@mescharet.de) wrote:
> Hey!
>
> > Maybe something from your initrd is acting weird?
>
> As far as I can tell, nothing from the initrd is running. It's
> basically ArchLinux's mkinitcpio run on gentoo - thus, pretty
> standard stuff.
"ps" should tell
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:53, Peter Valdemar Mørch (pe...@morch.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > This is something that can be fixed by adding stricter deps between
> > the service and the socket, so that the socket is always required to
> > be started befor
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:25, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:27 +0100]:
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-03 21:40 +0100]:
> > > > It's really about synchronous waiting on jobs.
Thank you Lennart for your explanation about the enqueuing. Sounds
reasonable. And helps me understand! :-)
Here I reply to you a little out of order:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> This is something that can be fixed by adding stricter deps between
> the service and
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 32
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+
Hey!
> Maybe something from your initrd is acting weird?
As far as I can tell, nothing from the initrd is running. It's
basically ArchLinux's mkinitcpio run on gentoo - thus, pretty standard stuff.
> It might be interesting to strace PID 1 while you are doing this. And
> if that doesn't help str
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:27 +0100]:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-03 21:40 +0100]:
> > > It's really about synchronous waiting on jobs. If you synchronously
> > > wait for completion of jobs that are ordered against
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
> Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
> drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
> enabled, but the former not, then systemd currently reads that so that
> the sysv one is overriden by the na
On 02/02/15 20:49, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> BTW, just to mention this. You can also just write:
>
> # systemctl start /home/myuser/data
That's good to know, thanks.
>
> This will automatically be translated to
> "home-myuser-data.mount". systemctl has some logic built in to
> translate strings t
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 17:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Is the resume event detected somehow in systemd?
>
> The kernel unfortunately provides no API for this right now. However,
> if logind is the one suspending the machine, then it sends out a
> PrepareForSleep() signal b
On Wed, 04.02.15 11:13, Peter Valdemar Mørch (pe...@morch.com) wrote:
> First: Please let me know if this is an inappropriate place to ask this
>
> # systemctl restart syslog.socket rsyslog.service
>
> seems to always work. But
>
> # systemctl restart rsyslog.service syslog.socket
>
> , the o
On Wed, 04.02.15 10:43, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
> info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
> visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
> try to set the overridden value.
Looks
On Wed, 04.02.15 10:08, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
> optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
> creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
> they are
On Wed, 04.02.15 02:21, Jay Faulkner (j...@jvf.cc) wrote:
> > I am not particularly fond of the idea of adding a completely new
> > command line option for this though. Maybe we can find another way for
> > this.
> >
> > For example, one option could be to split the seccomp syscall
> > blacklist
On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering [2015-02-03 21:40 +0100]:
> > It's really about synchronous waiting on jobs. If you synchronously
> > wait for completion of jobs that are ordered against the job your are
> > part of yourself, then things wil
On Tue, 03.02.15 21:03, Brandon Philips (bran...@ifup.co) wrote:
> Hey Lennart-
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> >> I have added DefaultDependencies= for you now:
> >>
> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.or
On 03/02/15 23:43, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The way I understand /usr/local, it is the place where the admin
himself places his own scripts and stuff, as extensions for the host
OS.
Yes, that view is consistent with the FHS (and e.g. Debian Policy's
interpretation of the FHS). "./configure --
On Wed, 04.02.15 04:40, Mikhail Morfikov (mmorfi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 1. When I try to connect for the very first time, I get a timeout, even
> though the container
> is working. I can cancel the connection immediately, and reconnect after 2-3
> sec and then the
> page shows up. All subsequen
First: Please let me know if this is an inappropriate place to ask this
# systemctl restart syslog.socket rsyslog.service
seems to always work. But
# systemctl restart rsyslog.service syslog.socket
, the opposite sequence, seems to sometimes fail (details below). I'm
wondering: Why is that?
A
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put into generator.late they would be ignored anyway.
This is particularly rele
Okay, Tom fixed this with 057255fbbf2ecb1c46e025b04087fa9340d9880d.
2015-02-03 21:50 GMT+01:00 Daniel Buch :
> Hi,
>
> This commit 51ddf61540976fc7b09ce5 solved systemd-resolved, but broke
> systemd-timesyncd. Atleast on my system.
>
> dbuch@dbuch-laptop ~ % lscpu | grep -i "byte"
> Byte Order:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 03.02.15 16:34, Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> > > > the UID/GID on entire filesystem sub-trees given to containers with
> > > > userns is a real unpleasant thing to have to deal with. I'd not want
> >
Hello all,
I changed the Subject: to make this thread a bit easier to find.
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-03 21:40 +0100]:
> It's really about synchronous waiting on jobs. If you synchronously
> wait for completion of jobs that are ordered against the job your are
> part of yourself, then things wi
71 matches
Mail list logo
