On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 04.03.15 18:51, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> If i run a transient scope on the user systemd instance like:
>>
>> $ systemd-run --user --scope true
>>
>> Then the scope seems to live past the end of the process
Add UdpCheckSum option to enable transmitting UDP checksums when doing
VXLAN/IPv4. Add Udp6ZeroChecksumRx, and Udp6ZeroChecksumTx
options to enable sending zero checksums and receiving zero
checksums in VXLAN/IPv6
---
man/systemd.netdev.xml | 24 +++-
src/libsy
On tor, 2015-03-05 at 00:00 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.03.15 18:51, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > If i run a transient scope on the user systemd instance like:
> >
> > $ systemd-run --user --scope true
> >
> > Then the scope seems to live past the end of th
Hey Zbigniew, hey all,
our autopkgtests found a regression in 219; unfortunately only
yesterday when we flipped our cloud images to systemd by default,
before that the bug was hidden.
As per tmpfiles.d(5), the first match should win if there are several
tmpfiles.d lines for the same directory. Ou
From: Harald Hoyer
The speedup is significant
Original libtool
$ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
[…]
real6m4.104s
user13m49.234s
sys7m37.864s
Original libtool + dolt
$ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
[…]
real2m24.869s
user7m30.198s
sys1m17.813s
---
con
On Thu, 05.03.15 01:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/src/core/service.c b/src/core/service.c
> > index a89ff3f..0942072 100644
> > --- a/src/core/service.c
> > +++ b/src/core/service.c
> > @@ -1119,6 +1119,30 @@ static int se
On 9 December 2014 at 17:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 09.12.14 16:24, Krzysztof Kotlenga (k.kotle...@sims.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Currently notify socket is unavailable in chrooted services (again)
>> unless you bind mount it there. Is there perhaps another, less
>> cumbersome way?
>>
On Wed, 04.03.15 15:18, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
Can't this just use getpeername_pretty()?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm
On Thu, 05.03.15 14:05, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Add UdpCheckSum option to enable transmitting UDP checksums when doing
> VXLAN/IPv4. Add Udp6ZeroChecksumRx, and Udp6ZeroChecksumTx
> options to enable sending zero checksums and receiving zero
> checksums in VXLAN/IPv6
I think us
On Wed, 04.03.15 16:27, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2015-03-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> > Well, just removing the symlink is kinda pointless. It might still be pulled
> > in by anything else that implicitly depepends on /tmp.
>
> What unit is supposed to pull in tmp.mo
On Thu, 05.03.15 08:36, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Le 04/03/2015 16:27, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> >2015-03-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> >>Well, just removing the symlink is kinda pointless. It might still be pulled
> >>in by anything else that implicitly depepends on
I have an Atom NM10-based industrial PC with three e1000e devices and a
PEAK can device (PCI ID 001c:0008). After updating from 216 to 219,
systemd-networkd is unable to get my e1000e-devices up and running. I
don't have any configuration for can0 within /etc/systemd/network.
It hit me that
Hi,
How do I add a slice that is inside the system.slice?
Following slice gets nested to -.slice where I want to nest it inside
system.slice (just like instantaneous service slices).
hello.slice
[Unit]
Description=hello slice
I tried following which produced the correct output with "systemctl
s
I have an Atom NM10-based industrial PC with three e1000e devices and
a PEAK can device (PCI ID 001c:0008). After updating from 216 to 219,
systemd-networkd is unable to get my e1000e-devices up and running. I
don't have any configuration for can0 within /etc/systemd/network.
It hit me that I
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:58:30AM +0100, har...@redhat.com wrote:
> Original libtool
> $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
> […]
> real6m4.104s
> user13m49.234s
> sys7m37.864s
>
> Original libtool + dolt
> $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
> […]
> real2m24.869s
> u
Hi,
I spent some time last night trying to track down the issue preventing
fedup from fedora 21 to 22:
https://bugzilla.redhat.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185604
I'm pretty sure I've tracked it down to when switch-root is called and
systemd-219 gets executed being passed the serialised state of systemd
Hey Zbigniew, all,
Martin Pitt [2015-03-05 10:20 +0100]:
> As per tmpfiles.d(5), the first match should win if there are several
> tmpfiles.d lines for the same directory. Our rsyslog package ships a
> /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/00rsyslog.conf which sets /var/log to 0775, so
> that it can write into it a
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
>> The logic here is that when we create a new bond we will create it
>> with these settings, but we will not change the settings of a
>> preexisting bond, as that may have been created by somebody else we
>> don't know about so we figure bet
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:06:05PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hey Zbigniew, all,
>
> Martin Pitt [2015-03-05 10:20 +0100]:
> > As per tmpfiles.d(5), the first match should win if there are several
> > tmpfiles.d lines for the same directory. Our rsyslog package ships a
> > /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/00r
Hello developers,
I have a Problem whit Jessie, systemd (maybe?) and my OpenVPN. I am
looking for help at the Debian Forum first, but i get no Answers :( (0)
Maybe only developers can help by this issue?
I use following packages:
network-manager | 0.9.10.0-6
network-manager debu
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:46 PM, system_error wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> I have a Problem whit Jessie, systemd (maybe?) and my OpenVPN. I am
> looking for help at the Debian Forum first, but i get no Answers :( (0)
>
> Maybe only developers can help by this issue?
>
> I use following packages:
On Thu, 05.03.15 15:46, system_error (t...@cacn.de) wrote:
> #NM-Manager (Window) crashes. My LAN was still allive (whitout VPN)
> Mar 5 14:55:45 desktop kernel: [ 1140.258095] nm-connection-e[2123]:
> segfault at 1326510 ip 01326510 sp 7fff11ebda18 error 15
This appears to be a bug
OK, thx!
Am 05.03.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> This is i segfault in NetworkManager, so I would start by figuring
> that one out. Probably the NM mailing list may be able to help you
> better.
mike
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 05.03.15 13:52, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I spent some time last night trying to track down the issue preventing
> fedup from fedora 21 to 22:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185604
>
> I'm pretty sure I've tracked it down to when switch-r
On 03/05/2015 02:46 PM, system_error wrote:
Mar 5 14:55:45 desktop kernel: [ 1140.258095] nm-connection-e[2123]:
segfault at 1326510 ip 01326510 sp 7fff11ebda18 error 15
I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that NetworkManager
segfaulting is systemd's fault but file a bug
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-03-05 15:47 +0100]:
> Looks good, please push!
Done, thanks for reviewing!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
__
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> The kernel creates bond0 itself. This is confusing and we should
> probably request the kernel to stop doing that (patch needed).
You can use "options bonding max_bonds=0" to disable the creation of bond0.
--
Michał Bartoszkiewicz
On 5 March 2015 at 15:14, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-03-05 15:47 +0100]:
>> Looks good, please push!
>
> Done, thanks for reviewing!
>
Is this going into v219-stable as well?
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:37:46PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 5 March 2015 at 15:14, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-03-05 15:47 +0100]:
> >> Looks good, please push!
> >
> > Done, thanks for reviewing!
> >
>
> Is this going into v219-stable as well?
Yes.
Zby
Add UDPCheckSum option to enable transmitting UDP checksums when doing
VXLAN/IPv4. Add UDP6ZeroChecksumRx, and UDP6ZeroChecksumTx
options to enable sending zero checksums and receiving zero
checksums in VXLAN/IPv6
V2: rename Udp to UDP
---
man/systemd.netdev.xml | 20
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:51:37 +0530, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
On Thu, 05.03.15 14:05, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
Add UdpCheckSum option to enable transmitting UDP checksums when doing
VXLAN/IPv4. Add Udp6ZeroChecksumRx, and Udp6ZeroChecksumTx
options to enable sending zero che
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:00 +0100, system_error wrote:
> OK, thx!
>
> Am 05.03.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> > This is i segfault in NetworkManager, so I would start by figuring
> > that one out. Probably the NM mailing list may be able to help you
> > better.
nm-connection-editor, to be
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:01:53 +0530, Michał Bartoszkiewicz
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
The kernel creates bond0 itself. This is confusing and we should
probably request the kernel to stop doing that (patch needed).
You can use "options bonding max_bonds=0" t
On 5 March 2015 at 15:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>
> Right before switch rooting systemd will kill all remaining processes
> of the initrd, including the strace, hence the strace logs aren't that
> useful either, they end before the transition.
>
> Please boot with "systemd.log_level=debug sy
2015-03-05 17:54 GMT+01:00 Dan Williams :
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:00 +0100, system_error wrote:
>> OK, thx!
>>
>> Am 05.03.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Tom Gundersen:
>> > This is i segfault in NetworkManager, so I would start by figuring
>> > that one out. Probably the NM mailing list may be able to h
On 03/05/2015 09:31 AM, Michał Bartoszkiewicz wrote:
You can use "options bonding max_bonds=0" to disable the creation of bond0.
Now there's a poorly documented (and named) module parameter!
--
Ian Pilcher
On 2015-02-28 at 00:50 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On 2015-02-27 at 22:25 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:40:23PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > > Because the order of coldplugging is not defined, we can reference a
> > > not-yet-coldplugged unit and
On 2015-02-26 at 02:53 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On 2015-02-26 at 02:46 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > Hi there.
> >
> > These patches allow using firstboot and sysusers together to construct an
> > initramfs with a fully functional emergency.service and rescue.service.
> >
> > Moreover,
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:09:54PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On 2015-02-26 at 02:53 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > On 2015-02-26 at 02:46 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > > Hi there.
> > >
> > > These patches allow using firstboot and sysusers together to construct an
> > > initramfs wit
On 2015-03-05 at 19:16 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:09:54PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > On 2015-02-26 at 02:53 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > > On 2015-02-26 at 02:46 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > > > Hi there.
> > > >
> > > > These patches al
Previously, globs would always get processed first followed by any other
items in arbitrary order. This is contrary to the documentation which
states "Otherwise, the files/directories are processed in the order they
are listed."
To fix this, remove the separate "globs" hashmap, and instead use onl
> You can use "options bonding max_bonds=0" to disable the creation of
> bond0.
>
That's exactly what I needed:
# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
Bonding Mode: load balancing (round-robin)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 1000
Up Del
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
Document:
- the new parameter CowJournal in journald.conf
- the new options --cow-journal and --no-cow-journal for
systemd-journal-remote.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
man/journald.conf.xml | 56 ++
man/syst
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
The commit 11689d2a force the NOCOW flag of the journal files. This was needed
because systemd-journald has very poor perfomance when the filesytem is
BTRFS due to its the COW behavior.
However removing the COW behavior, the journal file also lost the
btrfs checksum pr
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
Update the tests due to the new interface journal_file_open() and
journal_file_open_reliably().
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
src/journal/test-journal-flush.c| 2 +-
src/journal/test-journal-interleaving.c | 11 +++
src/journal/test-journal-s
Hi All,
the enclosed patches add an option to the journald.conf file to allow
a COW behavior for the journal files.
The commit 11689d2a force the NOCOW flag of the journal files. This was
needed because systemd-journald has very poor performance when the
filesytem is BTRFS due to its the COW beh
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
Update the journal-remote due to the update of the parameters of
the functions journal_file_open()/journal_file_open_reliably().
Moreover two options are added to systemd-journal-remote:
--cow-journal and --no-cow-journal to
unset/set the "no copy on write" attribute.
On 5 March 2015 at 17:07, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 5 March 2015 at 15:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>>
>> Right before switch rooting systemd will kill all remaining processes
>> of the initrd, including the strace, hence the strace logs aren't that
>> useful either, they end before the trans
2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 :
> From: Harald Hoyer
>
> The speedup is significant
>
> Original libtool
> $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
> […]
> real6m4.104s
> user13m49.234s
> sys7m37.864s
>
> Original libtool + dolt
> $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
> […]
> real
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 :
> > From: Harald Hoyer
> >
> > The speedup is significant
> >
> > Original libtool
> > $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
> > […]
> > real6m4.104s
> > user13m49.234s
> > sys7m37.864s
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> 2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 :
>> > From: Harald Hoyer
>> >
>> > The speedup is significant
>> >
>> > Original libtool
>> > $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
>> > […]
>> > real6
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:33:19PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> 2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 :
> >> > From: Harald Hoyer
> >> >
> >> > The speedup is significant
> >> >
> >> > Origina
On 03/05/2015 05:33 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 :
From: Harald Hoyer
The speedup is significant
Original libtool
$ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4
[…]
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:37 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:33:19PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> >> 2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 :
>> >> > From: Harald Hoyer
>> >> >
>> >>
В Thu, 05 Mar 2015 05:41:55 +0100
Branko пишет:
> I have a need to put my NICs in "RAID0" so to speak, but according to
> materials I have found on net I can't use NIC bonding driver because I
> would need LACP (IEEE whatever) aware L2 switch, so I was refered to
> teaming driver, which should
55 matches
Mail list logo
