On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Daurnimator q...@daurnimator.com wrote:
On 6 March 2015 at 16:13, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
So is SD_JOURNAL_FOREACH_BACKWARDS the fastest way to find the newest
journal entry with a given field? journalctl seems a ton faster than
my c application
it is trivial to fall back to our own timestamp
v2: use now()
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/timedate/timedated.c b/src/timedate/timedated.c
index 88d57e9..75b1f1b 100644
--- a/src/timedate/timedated.c
+++
---
po/fr.po | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/fr.po b/po/fr.po
index 1cd4b55..b3b17ce 100644
--- a/po/fr.po
+++ b/po/fr.po
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ msgid
msgstr
Project-Id-Version: systemd\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
-POT-Creation-Date: 2015-02-18
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/sd_journal_add_match.html
is pretty clear that the matches are in the form of 'FIELD=value' but
it doesn't mention the why.
What if I've written a field like FIELD, can I then match on it as FIELD?
I presume that sd_journal_add_match is doing an
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:22:22PM -0800, Shawn Landden wrote:
it is trivial to fall back to our own timestamp
v2: use now()
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/timedate/timedated.c b/src/timedate/timedated.c
index
On 9 December 2014 at 17:28, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 09.12.14 16:24, Krzysztof Kotlenga (k.kotle...@sims.pl) wrote:
Hi.
Currently notify socket is unavailable in chrooted services (again)
unless you bind mount it there. Is there perhaps another, less
On 6 March 2015 at 16:13, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
So is SD_JOURNAL_FOREACH_BACKWARDS the fastest way to find the newest
journal entry with a given field? journalctl seems a ton faster than
my c application is when I search for a given field that is not
present. And by search I'm
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 12:56:46AM +0100, Sylvain Plantefève wrote:
---
po/fr.po | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
it is trivial to fall back to our own timestamp
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/timedate/timedated.c b/src/timedate/timedated.c
index 88d57e9..7e47348 100644
--- a/src/timedate/timedated.c
+++ b/src/timedate/timedated.c
2015-03-06 7:09 GMT+03:00 Andrei Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
Linux bonding driver supports LACP (mode 4)
As i understand user can't use LACP because it switches does not support it.
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
dependency against it. What seems to confirm this is that if I add any
enabled foo.service which declares After=tmp.mount, or if I add the After=
statement to
On 06.03.2015 01:58, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 har...@redhat.com:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
The speedup is significant
Original libtool
$ ccache -C make clean time make -j4
[…]
real
Hi
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Jan Engelhardt jeng...@inai.de wrote:
I observe that upon loading of framebuffer drivers, I do not get the
desired system font, but the kernel-level defaults (usually
lib/fonts/font_8x16.c, but your mileage may vary depending on kernel
config and boot
Hi,
for debugging an ordering cycle during boot I tried to run
systemd --test --system --unit=multi-user.target --log-level=debug
as user (as it doesn't work as root).
The result is just:
systemd 210 running in system mode. (+PAM +LIBWRAP +AUDIT +SELINUX -IMA
+SYSVINIT +LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT
Hello,
when systemd creates a socket file, it explicitly calls a selinux
procedure to label it. I don't think that is needed, as the kernel does
the right thing when the socket is created. Am I missing something? Why
is the explicit labeling in place?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer,
diff --git a/doc/kdbus.message.xml b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
index c25000d..5e7c7a3 100644
--- a/doc/kdbus.message.xml
+++ b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct kdbus_msg {
For a message to be accepted as reply, it must be a direct
message to the
Hi
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Lukasz Skalski l.skal...@samsung.com wrote:
diff --git a/doc/kdbus.message.xml b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
index c25000d..5e7c7a3 100644
--- a/doc/kdbus.message.xml
+++ b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct kdbus_msg {
For a
On Fri, 06.03.15 13:04, Jan Synáček (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hello,
when systemd creates a socket file, it explicitly calls a selinux
procedure to label it. I don't think that is needed, as the kernel does
the right thing when the socket is created. Am I missing something? Why
is the
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Skalski l.skal...@samsung.com
diff --git a/doc/kdbus.message.xml b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
index c25000d..5e7c7a3 100644
--- a/doc/kdbus.message.xml
+++ b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct kdbus_msg {
For a message to be accepted as reply, it
Hi
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sat, 17.01.15 18:36, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
I think it's reasonable to allow setting the base-timeout in
/etc/systemd/logind.conf, but I want to know Lennart's opinion first.
Hi
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Lukasz Skalski l.skal...@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Skalski l.skal...@samsung.com
Applied!
Thanks
David
diff --git a/doc/kdbus.message.xml b/doc/kdbus.message.xml
index c25000d..5e7c7a3 100644
--- a/doc/kdbus.message.xml
+++
On Thu, 05.03.15 21:39, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Hi All,
the enclosed patches add an option to the journald.conf file to allow
a COW behavior for the journal files.
The commit 11689d2a force the NOCOW flag of the journal files. This was
needed because
Hey List,
Does the user instance of systemd expose a dbus api? If yes, how does one
access it?
Sincerely,
Ragnar Thomsen
rthoms...@gmail.com
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Hello,
On 03/06/2015 06:15 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello all,
Steve Langasek pointed out in [1] that idmapd is also necessary on the client
side. It isn't for my very simple NFSv4 test, but then again I don't know that
much about the various other modes of operation.
This patch starts
On 03/03/2015 05:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:37:24PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 03/03/2015 02:18 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:57PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
Indeed. From the man page:
-m retry-time
Le 06/03/2015 16:17, Michael Biebl a écrit :
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
dependency against it. What seems to confirm this is that if I add any
enabled foo.service which declares
Le 04/03/2015 13:40, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.03.15 13:19, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Before=systemd-timesyncd.service foo.service local-fs.target umount.target
systemd-timesyncd.service though is condition failed:
Condition: start condition failed at Wed
idmapd is needed on clients too, so start it from nfs-client.target and stop
binding to it in nfs-server.service.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1428961
---
systemd/nfs-client.target | 4 ++--
systemd/nfs-idmapd.service | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hello all,
Steve Langasek pointed out in [1] that idmapd is also necessary on the client
side. It isn't for my very simple NFSv4 test, but then again I don't know that
much about the various other modes of operation.
This patch starts nfs-idmapd.service on clients too.
Thanks,
Martin
[1]
On 2015-03-06 13:31, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 05.03.15 21:39, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Hi All,
the enclosed patches add an option to the journald.conf file to allow
a COW behavior for the journal files.
[...]
I am pretty strongly against adding an
I was using a journal iterator to search from the newest journal entry
backwards for a matching field, using SD_JOURNAL_FOREACH_BACKWARDS.
This appears to be pretty slow but journalctl is really fast. I went
looking and found sd_journal_query_unique() (although I'm not 100%
positive this is why
On 6 March 2015 at 14:25, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
I was using a journal iterator to search from the newest journal entry
backwards for a matching field, using SD_JOURNAL_FOREACH_BACKWARDS.
This appears to be pretty slow but journalctl is really fast. I went
looking and found
Hi,
I'm looking at some issues with the plymouth boot splash system, and
why it intermittently fails to get graphics on screen.
plymouth watches for the creation of drm display devices during boot.
If it finds one, it starts a graphical splash and that is that.
However, if the system finishes
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Daurnimator q...@daurnimator.com wrote:
On 6 March 2015 at 14:25, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
I was using a journal iterator to search from the newest journal entry
backwards for a matching field, using SD_JOURNAL_FOREACH_BACKWARDS.
This appears to be
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Wed, 04.03.15 15:18, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
Can't this just use getpeername_pretty()?
Then I can't force it to only ipv4 and ipv6.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ragnar Thomsen rthoms...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey List,
Does the user instance of systemd expose a dbus api?
Yes, that's what `systemctl` uses.
If yes, how does one access it?
Much like the system instance – either over the DBus user bus, or over
the
36 matches
Mail list logo
