On Mon, 27.07.15 16:35, c...@endlessnow.com (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
On Mon, 27.07.15 01:18, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
I suspect that somebody here knows why, but all mounts now fail...
well
all but /.
Has anyone run across this before? What did I miss?
I
Hi,
something I was wondering regarding kdbus and udev.
If udev wants to drop the netlink transport and instead rely on kdbus,
would this mean, systemd becomes mandatory in the initramfs to setup
kdbus before udev is run?
Will it still be possible in the future to run udev without systemd
in
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
something I was wondering regarding kdbus and udev.
If udev wants to drop the netlink transport and instead rely on kdbus,
would this mean, systemd becomes
Hi all,
for some time I have been looking at the issue why fsnotify does not work
with network filesystems and FUSE (with a shared backend).
I've found out that changes initiated on the localhost, on the filesystem
are supported by the fs change subsystems on Linux, and events initiated at
the
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
something I was wondering regarding kdbus and udev.
If udev wants to drop the netlink transport and instead rely on kdbus,
would this mean, systemd becomes mandatory in the initramfs to setup
kdbus before udev is run?
_If_
At first look, this seems very similar to FAM (which even supported NFSv3,
using custom notifications over SunRPC).
Later I remember GNOME replaced it with Gamin and finally with local-only
inotify inside glib/gvfs.
It might be useful to revive it, both inotify and fanotify have problems.
But I
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 06:22 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:05:37 +
Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com пишет:
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 21:53 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:29:57 +
Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com пишет:
On 28/07/15 17:28, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
At first look, this seems very similar to FAM (which even supported
NFSv3, using custom notifications over SunRPC).
Later I remember GNOME replaced it with Gamin and finally with
local-only inotify inside glib/gvfs.
What GLib actually uses is an
2015-07-28 19:20 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk:
On 28/07/15 17:28, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
At first look, this seems very similar to FAM (which even supported
NFSv3, using custom notifications over SunRPC).
Later I remember GNOME replaced it with Gamin and
I have no understanding of Coccinelle. I do not understand what you
are saying.
The application of a few scripts in the semantic patch language
can occasionally help to improve some software, can't it?
Now I'll try again to present more detailed source code analysis results
according to
Most likely you built your LVM/dm userspace without proper udev
support, or left support in there that creates device nodes on its
own.
Nowadays with devtmpfs device nodes are created exclusively by the
kernel and userspace should never create a single device node. If your
LVM/DM tools
On Tuesday 28 of July 2015 03:31:08 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 04.07.15 13:23, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:31:42PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 01.07.15 12:35, Daniel Tihelka (dtihe...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
does anyone
12 matches
Mail list logo