Hi all!
So I added the following rules:
[tom@localhost ~]$ grep . /etc/udev/rules.d/*
/etc/udev/rules.d/uas.rules:DRIVERS=="uas", TAG+="uaccess"
/etc/udev/rules.d/usb-storage.rules:DRIVERS=="usb-storage", TAG+="uaccess"
The rules basically works, but it doesn't support "hotplug", that is,
I have
Heya!
We'd like to remind you that the systemd.conf 2015 Call for
Presentations ends on August 31st! Please submit your presentation
proposals before that data on our website!
We are specifically interested in submissions from projects and
vendors building today's and tomorrow's products, service
Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this
outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred way
going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.h instead?
I manage an embedded product that leverages system heavily at the system le
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:45:28 +0800
"Tom Yan" wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> So I added the following rules:
> [tom@localhost ~]$ grep . /etc/udev/rules.d/*
> /etc/udev/rules.d/uas.rules:DRIVERS=="uas", TAG+="uaccess"
> /etc/udev/rules.d/usb-storage.rules:DRIVERS=="usb-storage",
> TAG+="uaccess"
>
I thin
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:45:28 +0800
"Tom Yan" wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> So I added the following rules:
> [tom@localhost ~]$ grep . /etc/udev/rules.d/*
> /etc/udev/rules.d/uas.rules:DRIVERS=="uas", TAG+="uaccess"
> /etc/udev/rules.d/usb-storage.rules:DRIVERS=="usb-storage",
> TAG+="uaccess"
Can you t
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Robert Milasan wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:45:28 +0800
> "Tom Yan" wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> So I added the following rules:
>> [tom@localhost ~]$ grep . /etc/udev/rules.d/*
>> /etc/udev/rules.d/uas.rules:DRIVERS=="uas", TAG+="uaccess"
>> /etc/udev/rules.d/usb
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser wrote:
> Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this
outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred
way going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.h instead?
D-Bus is not going away
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser
mailto:igei...@devonit.com>> wrote:
> Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this
> outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred
> way going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.
for traversing sysfs directory via slaves or holders subdirectories.
lsblk calls the holders direction "inverse".
python-pyudev does not provide such a facility, (but it unofficially
discontinued development
in 2013). And lsblk does not seem to use libudev facilities directly for this
traversal.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ian Geiser wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser wrote:
> > Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask
> this outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the
> preferred way going forward? Or should thin
On 08/19/2015 11:32 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ian Geiser mailto:igei...@devonit.com>> wrote:
...snip...
Not quite; …/systemd/private is not even a bus – it's a direct
peer-to-peer connection to systemd, providing just that one service. (It
is therefore in
On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> sd-bus has better performance and native
> kdbus support (and a better API than e.g. dbus-glib), but if you're
> writing programs in GTK or Qt or EFL, then you'll still want GDBus or
> QtDBus or Eldbus.
To clarify, *everything* has a better API than dbu
I may not understand something, but how does it work when I have things
like at-spi2-registryd running on my session? I cannot start one local
and one remote gui session, for example? Of course I mean the user bus.
W dniu 19.08.2015 o 18:13, Simon McVittie pisze:
On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Miku
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Michał Zegan
wrote:
> I may not understand something, but how does it work when I have things
> like at-spi2-registryd running on my session? I cannot start one local and
> one remote gui session, for example? Of course I mean the user bus.
>
I don't know how at-
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Simon McVittie <
simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> > The user bus address is
>
> ... tried by default in libdbus 1.9, GLib 2.45, and sd-bus; so you don't
> need to set DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS at all, unless you
Hi, systemd runs swapoff on shutdown, but unfortunately another step is
needed for NBD swap:
# nbd-client -d /dev/nbd1
This notifies the server that the client is shutting down, and thus the
nbd-server process is terminated, the swap file is erased etc.
In order to work around that issue, I'm
Woo it's a win of almighty grawity again! \o/
My rules works perfectly fine with the 70- prefix just as the shipped
70-uaccess.rules. Should have thought about it. Any pointer for
details about the "consumed" here btw?
On 19 August 2015 at 20:43, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at
17 matches
Mail list logo
