Re: [systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 2015-09-01 18:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >> I discovered that bootctl assume as default mount point for the ESP >> partition the /boot directory. Instead it seems to me that the most part >> of distributions prefers /boot/efi. > > For some

Re: [systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Simon McVittie < simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > I discovered that bootctl assume as default mount point for the ESP > > partition the /boot directory. Instead it seems to me that the most part > > of

Re: [systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > I discovered that bootctl assume as default mount point for the ESP > > partition the /boot directory. Instead it seems to me that the most part > > of distributions prefers

Re: [systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >> > I discovered that bootctl assume as default mount point for the ESP >> > partition the /boot directory.

[systemd-devel] how to support strict ordering going up and down?

2015-09-01 Thread Nekrasov, Alexander
Take the following structure: A.service: Requires=base.service Type=fork Restarts=no B.service: Requires=base.service Type=fork Restarts=no After=A C.service: Requires=base.service Type=fork Restarts=no After=B Up.target: Requires=A B C Normally, systemctl start up.target brings up base, A,

Re: [systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Chris Bell
On 2015-09-01 14:23, Kay Sievers wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: AIUI, /boot/efi also makes it a bit easier to have the ESP remain

Re: [systemd-devel] Backport git notes

2015-09-01 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-09-01 11:45 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : > As it looks like, Martin (Ubuntu/Debian) and myself (Debian) will be going. Let's say, we are planning to go :-) -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?

[systemd-devel] misuse of _cleanup_free_ in bus_message_from_header() ?

2015-09-01 Thread eshark
Hi, All, I found that in bus-message.c , the bus_message_from_header() seems to misuse the _cleanup_free_ , int bus_message_from_header() { _cleanup_free_ sd_bus_message *m = NULL; ==> _cleanup_bus_message_unref_

Re: [systemd-devel] question about sd_bus_slot_unref()

2015-09-01 Thread Jakub Sitnicki
Hi Li, On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:56 AM CEST, eshark wrote: > I wonder why the sd_bus_slot_unref() always returns NULL? I expect > that I can check whether the slot->n_ref ==0 by checking its return > value. It is my understanding that NULL is returned so that you can

Re: [systemd-devel] Backport git notes

2015-09-01 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, 2015-08-31 14:46 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn : > We have never did "mass backport", because most of them were irrelevant > for our ancient systemd in rhel. It is handy when I am looking for some > bugfix in upstream and the first step was to go through such patches. > > By the

Re: [systemd-devel] question about sd_bus_slot_unref()

2015-09-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 01.09.15 12:56, eshark (eshar...@163.com) wrote: > > Hi, all > > >     I wonder why  the sd_bus_slot_unref() always returns NULL?  I expect that > I can check whether the slot->n_ref ==0 by checking its return value. > That is > > >     _public_ sd_bus_slot*

[systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
Hi Kay, I am playing with bootctl; I discovered that bootctl assume as default mount point for the ESP partition the /boot directory. Instead it seems to me that the most part of distributions prefers /boot/efi. I am wrong ? I am working on a patch that automatically check if the

Re: [systemd-devel] bootctl: default mount point for the ESP partition.

2015-09-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > I discovered that bootctl assume as default mount point for the ESP > partition the /boot directory. Instead it seems to me that the most part > of distributions prefers /boot/efi. For some context, the reasoning for /boot/efi is: In some