[systemd-devel] hostnamectl set-deployment
I want to use this field for a list of roles the server will be setup with. It feels like a logical thing to do. But for some reason, the field is very limited: # hostnamectl set-deployment "roles:development roles:business" Could not set property: Invalid deployment 'roles:development roles:business' I can't seem to put in whitespace, underscores, etc. Why is it so limited? Kind regards, Samuel ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Skipping temporary coredump file during coredump generation
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 06:24:45AM +, P.R.Dinesh wrote:
> Thank you for the insight.
> Shall I propose the patch with the following behaviour.
>
> Check if "backtrace is enabled" or "compression is not enabled or not
> supported"
> Then store the temporary uncompressed file.
> If not skip the uncompressed file generation.
>
> if( backtrace_enabled || ( compression_not_enabled ||
> compress_not_supported))
> {
> generate and store uncompressed coredump
> }
> else
> {
> skip uncompressed coredump file, compress the STDIN COREFILE.
> }
Sure. To make things even nicer, if backtrace_enabled=1, but we don't
have enough disk space to write the uncompressed image, we could force
backtrace_enabled=0 and fall back to the else branch.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Assertion in systemd 219 version
On Mon, 05.12.16 16:24, Gaurang Shastri (gmshas...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I am using systemdv219 in one of my product and observing “Assertion” same > as mention here: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2676 > > > > But looks like the fix went, with 2 commits, is on way beyond new version > of systemd. With the v219, I am not even seeing all code matches with the > patch. > > > > So would you please let me know if it is good to apply the patch from here > ( I mean backport manually): > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2702/commits > > > > Though the variables mention in the patch does not match with v219 of > systemd. So what should I do to fix the issue? Usually the best way is to use a more current upstream version. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
