On 14 December 2017 at 12:22, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 14.12.17 22:17, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
>> It's perhaps unlikely for firmware itself to write to the ESP, but certainly
>> anything launched from the firmware can. One of my boot entries is an EFI
>> shell, an
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
wrote:
> Tom H:
>
>> The usual reason for not having a native unit is that you can't force
>> developers to do that work.
>
> Psst! This discussion is predicated upon a falsehood. There is an
> abundance of service units for Tomcat, and ha
Am 23.12.2017 um 18:31 schrieb Tom H:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
wrote:
Tom H:
The usual reason for not having a native unit is that you can't force
developers to do that work.
Psst! This discussion is predicated upon a falsehood. There is an
abundance of s
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 20.12.2017 um 14:52 schrieb Tom H:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>> in 2017 it shpuld be a native systemd-unit but from where comes the
>>> "vendor preset: enabled" in case of a generated unit?
>>
>> The u
Am 23.12.2017 um 18:28 schrieb Tom H:
so no, i don't see an excuse after that many years for crap within
/etc/init.d/
I doubt that distributions using a generator for sysvrc scripts agree
with you - or they've have systemd units for everything
i don't give a damn about random distributions