Re: [systemd-devel] "bootctl install" on mdadm raid 1 fails

2017-12-23 Thread Bjørn Forsman
On 14 December 2017 at 12:22, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 14.12.17 22:17, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote: >> It's perhaps unlikely for firmware itself to write to the ESP, but certainly >> anything launched from the firmware can. One of my boot entries is an EFI >> shell, an

Re: [systemd-devel] Disabling tomcat8

2017-12-23 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Tom H: > >> The usual reason for not having a native unit is that you can't force >> developers to do that work. > > Psst! This discussion is predicated upon a falsehood. There is an > abundance of service units for Tomcat, and ha

Re: [systemd-devel] Disabling tomcat8

2017-12-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.12.2017 um 18:31 schrieb Tom H: On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: Tom H: The usual reason for not having a native unit is that you can't force developers to do that work. Psst! This discussion is predicated upon a falsehood. There is an abundance of s

Re: [systemd-devel] Disabling tomcat8

2017-12-23 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 20.12.2017 um 14:52 schrieb Tom H: >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> in 2017 it shpuld be a native systemd-unit but from where comes the >>> "vendor preset: enabled" in case of a generated unit? >> >> The u

Re: [systemd-devel] Disabling tomcat8

2017-12-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.12.2017 um 18:28 schrieb Tom H: so no, i don't see an excuse after that many years for crap within /etc/init.d/ I doubt that distributions using a generator for sysvrc scripts agree with you - or they've have systemd units for everything i don't give a damn about random distributions