On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Do, 28.12.17 14:07, tedheadster (tedheads...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
>> generated the following error on startup:
>>
>> traps:systemd[1] trap
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:08:59PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 28.12.17 20:26, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 28.12.2017 um 20:07 schrieb tedheadster:
> > > I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
> > > generated the
On Do, 28.12.17 20:26, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.12.2017 um 20:07 schrieb tedheadster:
> > I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
> > generated the following error on startup:
> >
> > I believe it is getting an illegal instruction trap
I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
generated the following error on startup:
traps:systemd[1] trap invalid opcode ip:b7d97361 sp:bfa2f6bc error:0
in libsystemd-shared-233.so[b7d3e000+1cc000]
systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core as pid 78.
systemd[1]: Freezing execution
I
On Do, 28.12.17 14:07, tedheadster (tedheads...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
> generated the following error on startup:
>
> traps:systemd[1] trap invalid opcode ip:b7d97361 sp:bfa2f6bc error:0
> in libsystemd-shared-233.so[b7d3e000+1cc000]
Am 28.12.2017 um 20:07 schrieb tedheadster:
I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
generated the following error on startup:
I believe it is getting an illegal instruction trap on this first
generation 486 because it is calling "cpuid" in detect_vm_cpuid()
without
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>>
>> Please send a patch for this. We lack the relevant hardware and
>> can't test this. In fact, for most such portability support for
On 12/28/2017 01:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
...snippity
>> Am 28.12.2017 um 20:07 schrieb tedheadster:
The Linux kernel still supports the 486 so we have to code around this
case, even if it is ancient hardware
don't get me wrong - i am for 15 years now in the IT and my first PC in