Re: [systemd-devel] How to make an encrypted disk mentioned in /etc/crypttab "optional"?

On 10/11/23 04:40, Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote: Just FYI, in some situations it might be a security issue to allow booting without decrypting root volume (I know you're not doing for root). Just want to point out that it shouldn't be a default feature to skip decrypting. An example scenario

Re: [systemd-devel] Help! Reached target Local File Systems order is incorrect

Believe I found a solution after some extra debugging. However, I appreciate materials/links you provided.  It is definitely good stuff to know. Regards, Tony

Re: [systemd-devel] Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding

On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 8:09 AM Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote: > > I've progressed past this point by upgrading to Fedora 39 Beta which > apparently has a newer ukify version. The issue now though is that > automatic unlock does not work. I need to enter password manually and > I see no errors in

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolve and name servers order

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 09:37, Marc wrote: > Having 3 different nameservers reporting different results? > An example I have seen quite frequently is where there is an internal DNS which resolves local (internal) server resources and forwards anything else to an external server such as 8.8.8.8.

[systemd-devel] systemd-resolve and name servers order

I hope this is the right mailing list to ask that kind of question. I'm following what is recommended on github issue tracker: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/new/choose If it's not - feel free to point me to a different place. I use azure ubuntu 20.04 build with nameservers obtained

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolve and name servers order

> > I hope this is the right mailing list to ask that kind of question. I'm > following what is recommended on github issue tracker: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/new/choose > If it's not - feel free to point me to a different place. > > I use azure ubuntu 20.04 build with

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolve and name servers order

W dniu 2023-10-11 09:50, Marc napisał(a): I think this is not how resolv.conf was designed to be used. Are you 100% sure this is the only way to solve your issue? Having 3 different nameservers reporting different results? Can't you do something with views and sorting? What about just giving

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolve and name servers order

> In the past prior to systemd-resolve as a default solution the order I > think was followed. From what I understand windows > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows- > server-2008-R2-and-2008/dd197552(v=ws.10) > prefers first server on the list (it doesn't

Re: [systemd-devel] How to make an encrypted disk mentioned in /etc/crypttab "optional"?

Just FYI, in some situations it might be a security issue to allow booting without decrypting root volume (I know you're not doing for root). Just want to point out that it shouldn't be a default feature to skip decrypting. An example scenario where we shouldn't allow that would be where root

[systemd-devel] Support for loading Multiple DTBs from UKI image

Hi @systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Is there any support for parsing Multiple DTBs and selecting appropriate DTB from UKI image in system-boot? Or is there any UEFI interface hook to implement such a change in UEFI to make a selection of DTB,

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolve and name servers order

> > Obviously there are other solutions to the problem described above (eg > having multiple internal servers, although my experience was in the SOHO > environment where that would be excessive). If as Rafał says Windows > prioritises the first DNS option then I'm pretty sure that wasn't always

Re: [systemd-devel] Support for loading Multiple DTBs from UKI image

On Mi, 11.10.23 10:00, VENKAT Nagaraj THOGARU (QUIC) (quic_thog...@quicinc.com) wrote: > Hi > @systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, > > > Is there any support for parsing Multiple DTBs and selecting appropriate DTB > from UKI image in system-boot? >