[systemd-devel] run0 and run0 versus machinectl shell

2024-10-17 Thread Dominick Grift
I am encountering three issues with run0: 1. not upstream related but Debian (currently) does not install systemd-run0 pamname 2. the man page is incorrect in stating that everything goes through systemd-run0 pam stack because if you omit --user= then run0 will not go through pam (you can verif

[systemd-devel] systemd-nspawn - invisble directories ?

2024-10-17 Thread Joel GUITTET
Hello community, I face a strange behavior of my containers running using systemd-nspawn : some directories initially in the volume are not visible inside the container. It seems this is always the qame "kind" of directories e.g. maybe they are reserved for specific use ? Example: root@target

Re: [systemd-devel] run0 and run0 versus machinectl shell

2024-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 17.10.24 09:58, Dominick Grift (dominick.gr...@defensec.nl) wrote: > > I am encountering three issues with run0: > > 1. not upstream related but Debian (currently) does not install > systemd-run0 pamname Not sure what "pamname" means? Do you mean the PAM stack configuration file for run0?

Re: [systemd-devel] run0 and run0 versus machinectl shell

2024-10-17 Thread Dominick Grift
Lennart Poettering writes: > On Do, 17.10.24 09:58, Dominick Grift (dominick.gr...@defensec.nl) wrote: > >> >> I am encountering three issues with run0: >> >> 1. not upstream related but Debian (currently) does not install >> systemd-run0 pamname > > Not sure what "pamname" means? Do you mean the

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-nspawn - invisble directories ?

2024-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 17.10.24 11:48, Joel GUITTET (jguittet.opensou...@witekio.com) wrote: > systemd-nspawn --quiet --boot --network-bridge=br0 --read-only > --volatile=yes --notify-ready=yes --settings=override > --slice=${SLICE} --machine=%i You are using --volatile=yes. See the man page of what it does, you