17.06.2025 09:20, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On another note, even though NamePolicy doesn't provide any names in
your case, you should still clear it in general:
[Link]
NamePolicy=
Name=mycustometh
Why? NamePolicy is empty by default and only one .link file is applied.
There should be noth
Hi Lennart,
On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 10:24 AM CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 17.06.25 09:15, Claudius Heine (c...@denx.de) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently looking for a way to directly create and encrypt a LUKS
>> partition using a hardware token (TPM2, in this case) without requiring
On Di, 17.06.25 10:33, Claudius Heine (c...@denx.de) wrote:
> > systemd-repart seems to be what you are looking for. It can
> > create partitions at boot them, set up LUKS for them, lock them to TPM
> > and put a file system inside. It's really the tool of choice if you
> > want to augment disk im
On Di, 17.06.25 09:15, Claudius Heine (c...@denx.de) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently looking for a way to directly create and encrypt a LUKS
> partition using a hardware token (TPM2, in this case) without requiring
> an intermediary password/keyfile.
>
> IIUC, cryptsetup doesn't communicate with a
Hi,
I am currently looking for a way to directly create and encrypt a LUKS
partition using a hardware token (TPM2, in this case) without requiring
an intermediary password/keyfile.
IIUC, cryptsetup doesn't communicate with any hardware tokens, or
creates keys in them, while systemd-cryptenroll do
All:
Thank you for all your reply and the useful advice.
There is progress on this issue
In logs I find this:
Jun 17 02:46:02 intel-x86-64 systemd-udevd[252]: Skipping overridden file
'/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules'.
So I find:
root@intel-x86-64:~# ls -l /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-se
On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 10:54 AM CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 17.06.25 10:33, Claudius Heine (c...@denx.de) wrote:
>
>> > systemd-repart seems to be what you are looking for. It can
>> > create partitions at boot them, set up LUKS for them, lock them to TPM
>> > and put a file system ins
Hi Mikko,
On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 11:56 AM CEST, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote:
>> On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 10:54 AM CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > On Di, 17.06.25 10:33, Claudius Heine (c...@denx.de) wrote:
>> >> > systemd-repart s
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote:
> On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 10:54 AM CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 17.06.25 10:33, Claudius Heine (c...@denx.de) wrote:
> >> > systemd-repart seems to be what you are looking for. It can
> >> > create partitions at boot
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 01:37:19PM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote:
> On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 11:56 AM CEST, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote:
> >> On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 10:54 AM CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> > On Di, 17.06.25 10:33, Cla
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025, at 02:20, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> nfsroot= causes the interface to be brought up very early, before udev
> starts, and before it has a chance to apply its rules and .link files.
>
>
>
> Before kernel 6.2, it was not possible to rename interfaces that were already
> "up"
11 matches
Mail list logo
