Am Donnerstag, den 28.06.2012, 07:54 +0200 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
]] Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 27.06.12 21:59, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
Hmm, the other distributions have an #ifdef TARGET_FOOBAR section in
vconsole-setup for that. Debian
On 06/27/2012 07:01 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, well, not really. on-abort means that systemd would only restart
the service on actual crashes, i.e. where the main process exits with a
signal like SIGSEGV, SIGBUS or SIGABRT. This is different from
on-failure which is the behaviour you
On Wed, 27.06.12 20:21, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Well, it may be a hack rather than the nicest possible solution, but
here's the thing: every production installation of mysql in the world
runs underneath mysqld_safe, and has done for the last ten years or
more. The server's behavior
On Thu, 28.06.12 09:41, Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 06/27/2012 07:01 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, well, not really. on-abort means that systemd would only restart
the service on actual crashes, i.e. where the main process exits with a
signal like SIGSEGV, SIGBUS or
On Thu, 28.06.12 07:54, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
Heya,
On Wed, 27.06.12 21:59, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
Hmm, the other distributions have an #ifdef TARGET_FOOBAR section in
vconsole-setup for that. Debian currently
On Thu, 28.06.12 01:05, t...@jklm.no (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
From: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
Applied! Thanks!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On 06/28/2012 11:06 PM, David Strauss wrote:
* Other suggestions?
Last time I checked and unless I have missed something since, journal
and systemd still lack the ability to be connected and managed remotely
so you might want to focus on that.
JBG
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 27/06/12 21:38 did gyre and gimble:
On Wed, 27.06.12 14:56, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:
The service is systemd-udev.service, not systemd-udevd.service.
Applied, thanks!
Why isn't it called systemd-udevd.service? It would be more
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Nathan qwerty@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have built systemd version 26 for red hat enterprise 6.2. It works well.
I am trying to replace a half broken init system/service management
system we have running which was built in-house (and all the developers
