On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:27:24PM -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > I have now commited a fix that achieves the same as yours but doesn't
> > key this of the static service database: I simply extended the
> > OpenSession() bus cal
If you enter unit_add_exec_dependencies with m->where = NULL, you'll
very likely end up aborting somewhere under socket_needs_mount.
(When systemd goes to check to see if the journald socket requires your
mount, it'll do path_startswith(path, m->where)... *kaboom*)
This patch should ensure that:
Hi,
>> Please test!
> Will do.
I did:
$ loginctl show-session $XDG_SESSION_ID
$ su -
# exit
$ loginctl show-session $XDG_SESSION_ID
and in both cases
State=active
So patch seems to work.
Thanks
Ray
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I have now commited a fix that achieves the same as yours but doesn't
> key this of the static service database: I simply extended the
> OpenSession() bus call to inform clients whether they are a new session
> or just got the previ
On Fri, 12.10.12 15:45, Ray Strode (halfl...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
Heya,
> Some GDM/gnome-shell users having a rather strange issue where they
> can't unlock their screen because logind thinks their session is no
> longer active:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685988
> I've a
On Tue, 16.10.12 18:13, Federico Di Pierro (nierr...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi!
> I was trying to understand how does systemd hibernation process work.
> What i mean is: with pm-utils i had to put "tuxonice" in a
> /etc/pm/config.d/ file, within the SLEEP_MODULE array, to make pm work with
> it.
> Sy
On 10/16/2012 02:39 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 08.10.12 19:57, Bardur Arantsson (s...@scientician.net) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09/24/2012 12:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23.09.12 17:21, Bardur Arantsson (s...@scientician.net) wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
>> [--snip--]
>>>
>>
Hi!
I was trying to understand how does systemd hibernation process work.
What i mean is: with pm-utils i had to put "tuxonice" in a
/etc/pm/config.d/ file, within the SLEEP_MODULE array, to make pm work with
it.
Systemd instead seems to do this without any input from the user...that's
great, but h
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:01:04AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 15.10.12 23:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Lenn
On Tue, 16.10.12 12:03, Colin Guthrie (co...@mageia.org) wrote:
> Checks were already in place to make sure that the number of
> windows was limited to 64, but the count was never incremented
> or decremented.
Commited both! Thanks a ton for tracking this down!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering -
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:01:04AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 15.10.12 23:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Sat, 13.10.12 17:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.
On Tue, 16.10.12 11:01, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> systemctl status a and systemctl status a.service lead to same output but
> systemctl status a.b and systemctl status a.b.service do not.
Thanks! Appplied!
> ---
> src/shared/unit-name.c |6 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 inser
On Tue, 16.10.12 15:35, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2012/10/16 Lennart Poettering :
> > Now, Thomas' patch actually changes much less than people might
> > think. This is because sd_booted() simply checks whether
> > /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd is mounted. But to run --user on a foreig
2012/10/16 Lennart Poettering :
> Now, Thomas' patch actually changes much less than people might
> think. This is because sd_booted() simply checks whether
> /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd is mounted. But to run --user on a foreign system
> you need to set that tree up anyway, as that is a requirement for
On Tue, 16.10.12 09:33, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 16/10/12 01:18 did gyre and gimble:
> > On Sat, 06.10.12 01:11, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> >
> >> Running as a user instance won't work at all if systemd isn't run
It seems the previous code was copy/pasted from context_detach_window()
but not updated.
---
src/journal/mmap-cache.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/mmap-cache.c b/src/journal/mmap-cache.c
index 7813f03..251aefe 100644
--- a/src/journal/mmap-cac
Checks were already in place to make sure that the number of
windows was limited to 64, but the count was never incremented
or decremented.
---
src/journal/mmap-cache.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/journal/mmap-cache.c b/src/journal/mmap-cache.c
index 88fe523..7813f03
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 16/10/12 01:06 did gyre and gimble:
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 16/10/12 00:27 did gyre and gimble:
>> On Thu, 11.10.12 23:31, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This has been discussion on IRC but I've not heard anythin
I would like to be able to run systemd on systems that did not boot up with
systemd. For testing purposes and because I have some projects that reuse
systemd as a transaction computation engine. Thanks.
Colin Guthrie wrote:
>'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 16/10/12 01:18 did gyre and
systemctl status a and systemctl status a.service lead to same output but
systemctl status a.b and systemctl status a.b.service do not.
---
src/shared/unit-name.c |6 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/unit-name.c b/src/shared/unit-name.c
index cfe
Am 16.10.2012 02:22, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Sat, 06.10.12 01:11, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
>
>> The fstab generator adds Before=swap.target by default, and when creating
>> a custom .swap unit, you can also add Before=swap.target to the unit.
>>
>> However, it is impos
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 16/10/12 01:18 did gyre and gimble:
> On Sat, 06.10.12 01:11, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
>
>> Running as a user instance won't work at all if systemd isn't running as
>> system
>> manager, so refuse to start in that case.
>
> Applied. Th
22 matches
Mail list logo
