From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther hol...@moiji-mobile.com
Avoid memory allocations to construct the path for files in the
procfs. The procfs paths are way shorter than the PATH_MAX so we
can use snprintf on a string located on the stack. This shows up
as a win on x86 using the benchmark program
On Wed, 03.04.13 08:27, Holger Freyther (hol...@freyther.de) wrote:
+#define PROCFS_PATH_LEN (sizeof(/proc/)-1 + DECIMAL_STR_MAX(unsigned long))
Even though we use %lu to actually print the PID it's stil in the PID
range, so I'd prefer using DECIMAL_STR_MAX(pid_t) here...
+#define
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
put JobTimeoutSec=0 in device-unit.d/JobTimeoutSec0.conf files
This helps with grabbing a cup of coffee while booting and not have the
crypto password dialog timeout and systemd in a failed state.
This is even needed for timeout=0 in /etc/crypttab!
---
I would really appreciate some help with this from someone who's familiar with
the systemd internals.
What mechanism to prevent cg_trim from removing a cgroup before the newly
created child has completed cg_set_task_access?
I've created bug 63080 for this as well.
/Anders
-Original
On Wed, 03.04.13 15:34, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
put JobTimeoutSec=0 in device-unit.d/JobTimeoutSec0.conf files
This helps with grabbing a cup of coffee while booting and not have the
crypto password dialog timeout and systemd in a
Am 03.04.2013 16:52, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Wed, 03.04.13 15:34, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
put JobTimeoutSec=0 in device-unit.d/JobTimeoutSec0.conf files
This helps with grabbing a cup of coffee while booting and not have the
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
The password query for a crypto device currently times out after 90s,
which is too short to grab a cup of coffee when a machine boots up.
The resulting decrypted device /dev/mapper/luks-uuid might not
be a mountpoint (but part of a LVM PV or raid array)
and
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Will Stephenson wstephen...@kde.org wrote:
I'm joining the flock of desktop people investigating using systemd to start
a desktop session. So far I've checked out user-session-units and have
created some more granular unit files that will do a native systemd
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Will Stephenson wstephen...@kde.org wrote:
I'm joining the flock of desktop people investigating using systemd to start
a desktop session. So far I've checked out user-session-units and have
created some more granular unit files that will do a native systemd
On Wed, 03.04.13 17:02, Harald Hoyer (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
Well, this explanation is too short. You need to clarify that this only
has an effect on devices listed in fstab with their device mapper path
(i.e. rather than LABEL= or UUID=, which is by far more common). For the
generic
Sadly it makes the journal totally useless for me.
I gather its fixed but I'm just wondering if there is any way to fix
it in place,
or if I need to try to build the latest version and if so I'd like to
get a general
idea if that's going to be practical or if the whole OS will need rewired along
On 04/03/2013 08:22 AM, Will Stephenson wrote:
I'm joining the flock of desktop people investigating using systemd to start a
desktop session. So far I've checked out user-session-units and have created
some more granular unit files that will do a native systemd start rather than
u-s-u's
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Matthew Monaco m...@0x01b.net wrote:
Here are my user session units. I have a few dbus activated examples
https://github.com/mmonaco/systemd-user-session
I have one target for an i3 session and another for an openbox/cairo-dock
session. I can freely switch
Would you be willing to contribute some of these (the dbus activation
units for instance) back to user-session-units? There are quite a few
folks using work based on user-session-units (a few distro's package
it) and getting these in a central repository would help a lot of
folks.
I have
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H
auke-jan.h@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Matthew Monaco m...@0x01b.net wrote:
Here are my user session units. I have a few dbus activated examples
https://github.com/mmonaco/systemd-user-session
I have one target for an
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:20PM -0700, Lennart Poettering wrote:
-* systemctl status: show drop-in snippets for service files in addition to
service file path themesevles.
Unfortunately this part is not done yet. Only the dbus API is done.
Zbyszek
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 08:26:17AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:54:32AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H
auke-jan.h@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Matthew Monaco m...@0x01b.net wrote:
Here are my user session units. I have a few dbus activated examples
18 matches
Mail list logo
