On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> I just pushed the last couple of patches to enable DHCPv4 support in
> networkd[0]. Testing and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
> It is still very basic, but I'm personally using it full-time on my
> laptop (replacing NetworkManager/C
Am 01.01.2014 22:13, schrieb Andrey Borzenkov:
> В Ср, 01/01/2014 в 15:00 -0500, Dave Reisner пишет:
>> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
>>> in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that
В Ср, 01/01/2014 в 15:00 -0500, Dave Reisner пишет:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
> > in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when booting without
> > active consumer (let's say
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
> in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when booting without
> active consumer (let's say no NFS mounts in fstab) network-online.target
> is not start
systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when booting without
active consumer (let's say no NFS mounts in fstab) network-online.target
is not started at all. If NFS is mounted manually later, no
synchronization point exis
Hi guys,
I just pushed the last couple of patches to enable DHCPv4 support in
networkd[0]. Testing and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
It is still very basic, but I'm personally using it full-time on my
laptop (replacing NetworkManager/ConnMan), so it should be complete
enough to at least
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> struct sd_rtnl_message would keep two additional pointers into the hdr
> field. Every time hdr was realloced, those pointers should be adjusted,
> but weren't.
Or rather, only one of the two were adjusted, right?
> It seems les