On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Looks like src/shared/missing.h is missing IFF_MULTI_QUEUE
Thanks for the report. Added to missing.h now.
Cheers,
Tom
> The relavent part of the build log, configured with --enable-networkd:
>
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=comp
Looks like src/shared/missing.h is missing IFF_MULTI_QUEUE
The relavent part of the build log, configured with --enable-networkd:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/tmp/portage/sys-apps/systemd-216/work/systemd-216
-include .
On 2014-08-31 15:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2014-08-30 23:46, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:11:35PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
For some reason, sd_journal_query_unique()
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
>
>
> On 2014-08-30 23:46, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:11:35PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
> >>For some reason, sd_journal_query_unique() and sd_journal_add_match() don't
> >>work as they used to. Ther
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:12:22AM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
> ---
> man/journalctl.xml | 13 +++--
> src/journal/journalctl.c | 42 +++---
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Zbyszek
_
---
man/journalctl.xml | 13 +++--
src/journal/journalctl.c | 42 +++---
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/journalctl.xml b/man/journalctl.xml
index d4e0316..acd75a6 100644
--- a/man/journalctl.xml
+++ b/man/journ
On 2014-08-30 23:46, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:11:35PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
For some reason, sd_journal_query_unique() and sd_journal_add_match() don't
work as they used to. There's a chance boots will be skipped; in my
case only 60 of 393 boots show up
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:07:10PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > Hey, if you have patches already, I'll be glad to look at them :)
>>
>> OK well I'll spin what I have then, but I'm reviewing Wu's solution
>> from February as well.