On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sat, 07.02.15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the
Kai Krakow hurikha...@gmail.com schrieb:
But now I got a new message in the log:
Unable to autolaunch a dbus-daemon without a $DISPLAY for X11
Hmm, maybe Gentoo ships some dbus hookup for systemd user sessions
that triggers this?
It's triggered by gnome-keyring-daemon... I already set
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-20 17:02 +0100]:
To me this appears as if dbus is hanging for some reason. Have you
checked what dbus is doing?
D-Bus itself seems to be fine. There are services on it, busctl works,
etc.
Anyway, I now have a capable enough arsenal to reproduce that hang
fully
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Andrei Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you really need to fully overlay root? I.e. is it possible to just
(bind-)mount /etc, /var? /usr should be possible to retain read-only.
Once the upper layer of the overlayfs is JFFS2 (as intended), then it's
more
Does it make sense to avoid copying /etc/resolv.conf to a container if
the filesystem is read-only?
sudo /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn --read-only -M docker-centos-nginx
--read-only /usr/sbin/nginx
Failed to copy /etc/resolv.conf to
/var/lib/machines/docker-centos-nginx/etc/resolv.conf:
Hi,
Jeff Waugh:
- systemd dutifully starts all the services it knows about during the
initrd.target run, because they're all right there on the read-only
filesystem
… and because, I assume, they're implied by default.target.
So why don't you start the system with some different target that
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no such dependency in Debian either [1].
Luke simply has no idea what he is talking about.
It would be great if Luke did some basic research and educate himself
and not spread such misinformation.
michael,
Le 19 février 2015 23:31, Sylvain Plantefève
sylvain.plantef...@gmail.com a écrit :
---
po/fr.po | 76
+---
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/fr.po b/po/fr.po
index 8e44e0c..58a0b85 100644
---
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:24:37PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so i'm not going to protest - i'm going to try a different approach.
i'd like you to look at this list of debian packages that are
dependent
Andrei Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com writes:
В Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:56:42 +0100
Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com пишет:
To be more consistent with how dracut parses rd.luks.key, it is now
allowed to specified it in the format keyfile[:keyfile_device].
Should keyfile_device be provided, it
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2015-02-23 2:08 +]:
the problem, zbigniew, is that the intended use of this silent noop
feature - to make it *possible* to have an alternative PID1 - *hasn't
happened*.
It sure has. Debian supports systemd, SysV init, and to a lesser
degree OpenRC and
El 22/02/15 a las 23:08, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton escribió:
the problem, zbigniew, is that the intended use of this silent noop
feature - to make it *possible* to have an alternative PID1 - *hasn't
happened*. any upstream software developer who has added in support
for systemd has done
El 22/02/15 a las 22:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton escribió:
well, you could provide hints in the documentation (and force them to
be read by deliberately changing the API)
Wow.. so what you want is even nuttier than I thought..
that would be a good place to start, showing people how
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
i don't know if you've seen this yet:
http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/02/15/1959209/removing-libsystemd0-from-a-live-running-debian-system
my name's luke leighton, i'm a software libre advocate, and the
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:58:25PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Tobias Hunger tobias.hun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Luke,
I am mostly a lurker on the systemd mailing list, so my opinion does
not carry weight in this community.
On Tue, Feb
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:58:25PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Tobias Hunger tobias.hun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Luke,
I am mostly a lurker on the systemd
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Cameron Norman
camerontnor...@gmail.com wrote:
...except that its introduction (usually --with-libsystemd) in those
100 (or so) packages has been done in a mutually-exclusive,
hard-compile-time switch that *excludes* the possibility of dynamic
(runtime)
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Tobias Hunger tobias.hun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luke,
I am mostly a lurker on the systemd mailing list, so my opinion does
not carry weight in this community.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote: so i'm not going
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 17.02.15 20:24, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
i note that there was announcement recently that the systemd team
'listens to users', so i am taking you at your word on that.
Hmm,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:58:25PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
...except that its introduction (usually --with-libsystemd) in those
100 (or so) packages has been done in a mutually-exclusive,
20 matches
Mail list logo
