Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus vs gdbus on dbus-daemon

2015-04-30 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Hi Simon, On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote: On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. ... gdbus.c -

[systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread arnaud gaboury
I already used for a while a container (Arch on Arch). I had two distinct IP and a working setup thanks to good help from Tom Gundersen I am trying to replicate my network settings on a new setup (Fedora on Arch). For now, I am just trying with DHCP. Here the setup on host:

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] test-socket-util: Fix tests on machines without ipv6 support

2015-04-30 Thread systemd github import bot
Patchset imported to github. Pull request: https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1430381911-30460-1-git-send-email-sjoerd.simons%40collabora.co.uk -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus vs gdbus on dbus-daemon

2015-04-30 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Hi Greg, On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: Hi, We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCHv2] core: do not spawn jobs or touch other units during coldplugging

2015-04-30 Thread systemd github import bot
Patchset imported to github. Pull request: https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1429895189.10988.22.camel%40gmail.com -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___ systemd-devel mailing list

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] test-socket-util: Fix tests on machines without ipv6 support

2015-04-30 Thread Sjoerd Simons
The test for socket-util already has some code to only do certain tests on machines with ipv6 support. However this was incomplete causing the test to still fail on such machines, this patch adds the remaining cases required to make it pass on machine without ipv6 support. ---

Re: [systemd-devel] initrd mount inactive

2015-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 29.04.15 12:09, aaron_wri...@selinc.com (aaron_wri...@selinc.com) wrote: I applied those other commits you listed, and I took a look at the lvm2 package, which was being compile with --disable-udev_sync and --disable-udev_rules. I enabled both of those and recompiled both lvm2 and

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] treewide: fix typos

2015-04-30 Thread Torstein Husebø
--- man/systemd.unit.xml| 2 +- src/import/export-tar.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/systemd.unit.xml b/man/systemd.unit.xml index c2e374a94e..0aa1eeac77 100644 --- a/man/systemd.unit.xml +++ b/man/systemd.unit.xml @@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 10:01, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: I used to boot the container this way : # systemd-nspawn --network-bridge=br0 -bD /path_to/my_container Is this correct? Looks fine.

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 30.04.15 10:01, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: I used to boot the container this way : # systemd-nspawn --network-bridge=br0 -bD /path_to/my_container Is this correct? Looks fine. * Now on the container side: Nothing configured.

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] treewide: fix typos

2015-04-30 Thread systemd github import bot
Patchset imported to github. Pull request: https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1430387829-4227-1-git-send-email-torstein%40huseboe.net -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___ systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 10:01, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: I used to boot the container this way : #

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:48 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 10:01, arnaud gaboury

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 30.04.15 12:48, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: E2978F 2: host0 Link File: n/a Network File: n/a Type: ether State: off (unmanaged) HW Address: 0e:7f:c3:fb:25:b1 MTU: 1500 So, as it appears networkd does consider itself

Re: [systemd-devel] pam_systemd.so indirectly calling pam_acct_mgmt

2015-04-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 15:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 08:54, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: Does set-linger persist across reboots? Yes it does. When a systemd is booted up with a user that has lingering on this means that his user@.service

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 30.04.15 12:18, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 10:01, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: I used to boot the container this way : # systemd-nspawn

[systemd-devel] networkd: dbus API for networkd reconfiguration at run-time

2015-04-30 Thread Rauta, Alin
Hi Tom, Lennart, I have some questions regarding dbus API and run-time networkd configuration. I would really appreciate your answers/suggestions. First, when upstreaming BridgeFDB support in networkd, I had (in the first place) a patch composed of 2 parts: - One part for clearing

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015, 2:22 PM Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 12:48, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: E2978F 2: host0 Link File: n/a Network File: n/a Type: ether State: off (unmanaged) HW Address:

Re: [systemd-devel] pam_systemd.so indirectly calling pam_acct_mgmt

2015-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 30.04.15 08:54, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: Does set-linger persist across reboots? Yes it does. When a systemd is booted up with a user that has lingering on this means that his user@.service instance is invoked at boot, without waiting for any login. Lennart --

Re: [systemd-devel] pam_systemd.so indirectly calling pam_acct_mgmt

2015-04-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 11:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 29.04.15 22:24, Jakub Hrozek (jakub.hro...@posteo.se) wrote: ...why exactly does systemd-user need to call the account stack for? Again, I totally understand session, but account? Well, if the user service is started

Re: [systemd-devel] pam_systemd.so indirectly calling pam_acct_mgmt

2015-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 29.04.15 22:24, Jakub Hrozek (jakub.hro...@posteo.se) wrote: ...why exactly does systemd-user need to call the account stack for? Again, I totally understand session, but account? Well, if the user service is started without the user being logged in (because loginctl set-linger was

Re: [systemd-devel] [Q] About supporting nested systemd daemon

2015-04-30 Thread Alban Crequy
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 25.02.15 00:05, Cyrill Gorcunov (gorcu...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi all! I would really appreciate if someone enlighten me if there is some simple solution for the problem we met in OpenVZ: modern containers

Re: [systemd-devel] network interface down in container

2015-04-30 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 11:44 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 30.04.15 10:01, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote: I used to boot the container this way : # systemd-nspawn --network-bridge=br0 -bD /path_to/my_container Is this correct? Looks fine.

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] shared/utmp-wtmp: fix copy/paste error

2015-04-30 Thread Michael Olbrich
--- src/shared/utmp-wtmp.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/shared/utmp-wtmp.h b/src/shared/utmp-wtmp.h index 6ac2c7b1c768..5d26ba6fb1d0 100644 --- a/src/shared/utmp-wtmp.h +++ b/src/shared/utmp-wtmp.h @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static inline int utmp_wall(

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: remember errno before it might be overwritten

2015-04-30 Thread Michael Olbrich
--- I'm not sure if this is really necessary right now, but that might change in the future. Saving errno before calling another function is always a good idea. Michael src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c

Re: [systemd-devel] tmpfiles versus tmpwatch

2015-04-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:28:26PM +1200, Roger Qiu wrote: Doesn't relatime still update the time if the file is 1 day old (regardless of modication time), and the current tmpfiles wipes files that are older by 10 days? Yes, everything should work with relatime, unless you set tmpfiles cleanup

[systemd-devel] journal-.gitignore-add-audit_type-from-name

2015-04-30 Thread Daniel Buch
From 785b1367fedb912e91074360c0961209ac5dc9f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Buch boogiewasth...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:20:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] journal: .gitignore add audit_type-from-name* --- src/journal/.gitignore | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: try to handle read-only file systems gracefully

2015-04-30 Thread systemd github import bot
Patchset imported to github. Pull request: https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1430419838-24907-1-git-send-email-m.olbrich%40pengutronix.de -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___ systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] shared/utmp-wtmp: fix copy/paste error

2015-04-30 Thread systemd github import bot
Patchset imported to github. Pull request: https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1430418517-18485-1-git-send-email-m.olbrich%40pengutronix.de -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___ systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: remember errno before it might be overwritten

2015-04-30 Thread systemd github import bot
Patchset imported to github. Pull request: https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1430418896-20297-1-git-send-email-m.olbrich%40pengutronix.de -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___ systemd-devel

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: try to handle read-only file systems gracefully

2015-04-30 Thread Michael Olbrich
On read-only filesystems trying to create the target will not fail with EEXIST but with EROFS. Handle EROFS by checking if the target already exists, and if empty when truncating. This avoids reporting errors if tmpfiles doesn't actually needs to do anything. --- This is a rework of a patch I

Re: [systemd-devel] timers always run when time changes

2015-04-30 Thread Cameron Norman
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Likang Wang labor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The entire system is running on an embedded box, and the system time will be set to 2008-01-01 00:00:00 after every reboot. My app running on the box will get the real time from my server and update time on the box

[systemd-devel] timers always run when time changes

2015-04-30 Thread Likang Wang
Hi all, I hava a timer with the fellowing setting: # cat /lib/systemd/system/updateimage.timer [Unit] Description=Update image DefaultDependencies=false [Timer] OnCalendar=*-*-* 02:00:00 Persistent=false [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target And I want the timer call the same-name service

Re: [systemd-devel] timers always run when time changes

2015-04-30 Thread Likang Wang
The custom time syncing service file does not have Before=time-sync.target. In fact, not only when the time changes by the custom time syncing service ,but also when I set the time manually by date -s 2015-05-01 11:08:00, the timer and the same-name service will run. Here is the custom time

Re: [systemd-devel] initrd mount inactive

2015-04-30 Thread Aaron_Wright
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote on 04/30/2015 02:39:45 AM: On Wed, 29.04.15 12:09, aaron_wri...@selinc.com (aaron_wri...@selinc.com) wrote: I applied those other commits you listed, and I took a look at the lvm2 package, which was being compile with --disable-udev_sync