[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v222

2015-07-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi This is primarily a bugfix release, but we also changed the way we provide release sources. We no longer build tarballs but instead only provide git archives. The build-system has been adjusted to make sure git-archives will be the same as tarballs, apart from the pre-built autotools scripts. T

Re: [systemd-devel] Fwd: sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Robert, all, Robert Ancell [2015-07-07 23:53 +]: > 1. LightDM starts up > 2. LightDM starts an X server on a free VT (e.g. 7) > 3. LightDM starts a greeter process which connects to the X server. Via > libpam-systemd a logind session is opened. > 4. User logs in via greeter. > 5. LightDM s

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello again, Martin Pitt [2015-07-07 20:56 +0200]: > Thanks, looks good! It's surely a workaround, but indeed this might > not be the only case that's affected, so thanks for this safety net. > I'll build a package with that and ask the reporter for testing. That happened now, all good for the re

[systemd-devel] Fwd: sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Robert Ancell
-- Forwarded message - From: Robert Ancell Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 at 11:49 Subject: Re: sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm To: David Herrmann , poma Cc: systemd Mailing List , LightDM Mailing List On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 at 04:31 David Herrmann wrote: > Hi

Re: [systemd-devel] oneshot service

2015-07-07 Thread Ivan Shapovalov
On 2015-07-07 at 13:04 -0400, Ernast Sevo wrote: > Apologies that was mistakenly sent. The example service is below. > > [Unit] > Before=local-fs.target > After= > DefaultDependencies=false > > [Service] > Type=oneshot > ExecStart=/usr/bin/xxx > RemainAfterExit=yes > > [Install] > WantedBy=local

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-07-07 23:12 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mack : > On 07/07/2015 04:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Assertion 'fsck_exists("minix") == 0' failed at >> src/test/test-path-util.c:213, function test_fsck_exists(). Aborting. >> Aborted > > That's due to a missing --enable-split-usr during configure I guess. How

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Daniel Mack
On 07/07/2015 04:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2015-07-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : >> Hi >> >> We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that >> need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release >> consists almost exclusively of bug-fixes, and we want t

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:08 PM, poma wrote: > On 07.07.2015 19:48, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:10 PM, David Herrmann wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-07-07 18:31 +0200]: >>>

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-07-07 22:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : > 2015-07-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : >> Hi >> >> We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that >> need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release >> consists almost exclusively of bug-fixes, and we want to

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-07-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : > Hi > > We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that > need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release > consists almost exclusively of bug-fixes, and we want to get those > into distributions. I'm getting a "ma

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread poma
On 07.07.2015 19:48, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:10 PM, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: >>> Hey David, >>> >>> David Herrmann [2015-07-07 18:31 +0200]: > Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist"

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello David, David Herrmann [2015-07-07 19:10 +0200]: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > > It's not that simple to reproduce, but sometimes it seems the lightdm > > "greeter" session (running as user lightdm, where you select user/type > > password and so on) doesn't completel

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:10 PM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Hey David, >> >> David Herrmann [2015-07-07 18:31 +0200]: >>> > Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist" - commit 0204c4b >>> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/syst

Re: [systemd-devel] oneshot service

2015-07-07 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:04:11 -0400 Ernast Sevo пишет: > Apologies that was mistakenly sent. The example service is below. > > [Unit] > Before=local-fs.target > After= > DefaultDependencies=false > > [Service] > Type=oneshot > ExecStart=/usr/bin/xxx > RemainAfterExit=yes > > [Install] > WantedBy=

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Laércio de Sousa
I can confirm lightdm greeter leaves some proccesses behind when it's closed (like dbus-launch, dbus-daemon, at-spi-bus-launcher...) They are only definitely terminated when user logs out from that seat. 2015-07-07 14:10 GMT-03:00 David Herrmann : > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Martin P

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hey David, > > David Herrmann [2015-07-07 18:31 +0200]: >> > Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist" - commit 0204c4b >> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=0204c4b >> >> Can someone elaborate what exact

Re: [systemd-devel] oneshot service

2015-07-07 Thread Ernast Sevo
Apologies that was mistakenly sent. The example service is below. [Unit] Before=local-fs.target After= DefaultDependencies=false [Service] Type=oneshot ExecStart=/usr/bin/xxx RemainAfterExit=yes [Install] WantedBy=local-fs.target The problem is I can see boot-up continue prior to this service d

[systemd-devel] oneshot service

2015-07-07 Thread Ernast Sevo
Hello! According to the documentation for a oneshot service "it is expected that the process has to exit before systemd starts follow-up units". I have the following service: ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://list

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-07-07 18:31 +0200]: > > Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist" - commit 0204c4b > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=0204c4b > > Can someone elaborate what exactly lightdm does here? We really want > to prevent multiple sessi

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:14 PM, poma wrote: > > Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist" - commit 0204c4b > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=0204c4b Can someone elaborate what exactly lightdm does here? We really want to prevent multiple sessions on the s

Re: [systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello poma, poma [2015-07-07 18:14 +0200]: > Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist" - commit 0204c4b > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=0204c4b Thanks for analyzing this! As it happens I got a bug report today about the same regression from a user who uses

[systemd-devel] sd 221 regression: login - nonexistent sessions via lightdm

2015-07-07 Thread poma
Revert "login: re-use VT-sessions if they already exist" - commit 0204c4b http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=0204c4b $ loginctl SESSIONUID USER SEAT c1989 lightdm seat0 1 sessions listed. $ /usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authenticat

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 17:16 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Michael Biebl > wrote: > > 2015-07-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : > > > Hi > > > > > > We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues > > > that > > > need to be in that releas

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2015-07-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : >> Hi >> >> We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that >> need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release >> consists almost exclusively of bug-fixes,

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-07-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : > Hi > > We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that > need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release > consists almost exclusively of bug-fixes, and we want to get those > into distributions. Regarding the rem

Re: [systemd-devel] HEADS-UP: splitting python-systemd out

2015-07-07 Thread Stefan Tatschner
On Di, 2015-07-07 at 15:49 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Regarding the documentation: I failed to generate the documentation > with sphinx since it didn't find the python modules. > Do you have some instructions how this can be done. You could e. g. install the module (with pip in edit mode) in a

Re: [systemd-devel] HEADS-UP: splitting python-systemd out

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-07-07 2:51 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > Comments, patches, pull requests — especially for documentation and tests — > are very much welcome. Regarding the documentation: I failed to generate the documentation with sphinx since it didn't find the python modules. Do you have some i

Re: [systemd-devel] HEADS-UP: splitting python-systemd out

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2015-07-07 4:50 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:11:28AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Do you intend to publish release tarballs somewhere or should we get one from >> https://github.com/systemd/python-systemd/releases ? > I was hoping that the signed tags and t

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-tmpfiles for the user instance of systemd

2015-07-07 Thread Daniel Tihelka
On Friday 03 of July 2015 20:31:42 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 01.07.15 12:35, Daniel Tihelka (dtihe...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hello, > > does anyone have an experience with the use of systemd-tmpfiles for the > > user instance of systemd. > > This is currently not nicely supported. And I a

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Michael Olbrich > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:54:41PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > >> We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that > >> need to be in that release, plea

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Dominick Grift
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:56:45AM +0100, Richard Maw wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:25:21AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Dominick Grift > > wrote: > > > Would be nice if anyone could at least confirm or deny this issue that > > > I've identified in sys

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Richard Maw
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:10:35AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:54:41PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > This will be a release without 'distcheck' tarballs, right? If that's the > case, then please merge https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/505 or make > lib

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:54:41PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that >> need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release >> consists almost exclusively of b

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Richard Maw
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:25:21AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Dominick Grift wrote: > > Would be nice if anyone could at least confirm or deny this issue that I've > > identified in systemd-nspawn since v220: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] systemd-222 around the corner

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:54:41PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > We intend to release v222 tomorrow. If anyone has open issues that > need to be in that release, please speak up. Right now, the release > consists almost exclusively of bug-fixes, and we want to get those > into distributions.