On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, at 08:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I'd be careful with things like this... You invoke firefox as PID 1
> then. On UNIX PID 1 is special, it needs to reap foreign children and
> needs to handle signals differently, thus taking arbitrary processes
> and running them like th
On Mon, 24.08.15 21:50, Liam Girdwood (liam.r.girdw...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> Currently firmware loading with built-in drivers is failing on systems
> that mount an initramfs before the root FS is mounted (that contains the
> firmware file). Modular drivers work fine.
>
> Keyon (Jie, Yang) has
Currently firmware loading with built-in drivers is failing on systems
that mount an initramfs before the root FS is mounted (that contains the
firmware file). Modular drivers work fine.
Keyon (Jie, Yang) has done some testing with the Intel audio DSP driver
and found that the built-in firmware lo
On 21 August 2015 at 11:56, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> PS: Please let me know if this is not the preffered way of sending patches
> to systemd, as I've seen some activity on github. I can prepare a PR if
> needed.
>
I've created a pull request, since looking at older messages here it
is clea
Hi John,
I do run a couple of (mostly -- I do keep /var) stateless systems and
have few problems with those ever since systemd 222.
Best Regards,
Tobias
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 21.08.15 07:24, john maverick (johnmaveric...@inbox.com) wrote:
>
>> Hell
On Fri, 21.08.15 12:22, Some Body (somebody.mo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi, I'm not experienced at all with systemd, and not much more in system
> administration, and I don't know if I should post this here, but it is the
> only list I found that seems to provide general support for systemd.
>
> I
On Fri, 21.08.15 07:24, john maverick (johnmaveric...@inbox.com) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I just re-read Lennart's posts (which i loved):
>
>
> - Factory Reset, Stateless Systems, Reproducible Systems & Verifiable Systems
>
> and
>
> - Revisiting How We Put Together Linux Systems
>
> And i would
On Sun, 23.08.15 21:58, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've managed to get Firefox running like so:
>
> sudo systemd-nspawn --setenv=DISPLAY=:0 \
>--setenv=XAUTHORITY=~/.Xauthority \
>--bind-ro=$HOME/.Xauthority:/root/.Xauthority \
>
On 08/24/2015 07:49 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> On 08/23/2015 08:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>> Here is my setup:
>>>
>>> Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
>>> Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
>>>
>>> The container is a server and has v
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 08/23/2015 08:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> Here is my setup:
>>
>> Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
>> Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
>>
>> The container is a server and has vocation to be one day deployed on a
>> dediacted server
On 08/23/2015 08:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> Here is my setup:
>
> Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
> Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
>
> The container is a server and has vocation to be one day deployed on a
> dediacted server for production. In this way, I would like to set
> SElinux (default
I have actually reported this as an issue on github.
From the later conversation via issue comments with Lennard I have
discovered that brltty is holding the /dev/vcsa open, interfering with
tty autoactivation logic.
W dniu 24.08.2015 o 12:08, David Herrmann pisze:
Hi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at
Hi
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:07 PM, cee1 wrote:
> 2015-08-07 17:18 GMT+08:00 eshark :
>> Hi, all
>> If some message went into bus->wqueue, and failed to run
>> ioctl(KDBUS_CMD_SEND) and returned r < 0,
>> I found that this message will remain in the bus->wqueue. If the peer is
>> kill
Hi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Michał Zegan
wrote:
> Seems like this does not apply. I said that terminals do not start, and this
> is random, sometimes they do. n_auto_vts = 6.
Can you provide more details about this? How do you reproduce it? What
are you running on your machine? What oth
On 21/08/15 17:04, Jayson Willson wrote:
> However, on my system, without any special
> polkit configuration standard user (which is in the groups mentioned
> above) can ignore inhibitors by running systemctl poweroff -i without
> being asked for authentication.
For the benefit of the list, it app
15 matches
Mail list logo