Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I don't understand one part: why do you say that creating a new target
requires writing C++ code?
Certainly new targets don't require C++ code, as systemd is written in
C! But I was trying to say that new targets with naively expected
synchronization
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> I am looking for guidance on how to properly resolve driver binding
> with systemd (which seems to me the best place to do that).
This seems to be a too exotic and niche use case, nothing
general-purpose enough to
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > I am looking for guidance on how to properly resolve driver binding
> > with systemd (which seems to me the best place to do that).
>
> This seems to be a
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:47:43AM -0700, Chaiken, Alison wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >I don't understand one part: why do you say that creating a new target
> >requires writing C++ code?
>
> If it is in fact possible to write a
> new .target unit that will serve as a new
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>> > I am looking for guidance on how to properly resolve driver binding
>> >
I wonder if this could be handled with a generic Type=oneshot,
ExecStart=driverctl bind foo...
--
Mantas Mikulėnas
On Sep 28, 2015 21:48, "Flavio Leitner" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Flavio
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015, 18:14 Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> We are close to being sold out now, only 14 tickets are still
> available now. If you intend to attend, make sure to register for the
> conference *now*, before it's too late and all tickets are gone.
>
> Register
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:19 AM Alessio Igor Bogani <
alessioigorbog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi systemd developers and users,
>
> The systemd 219 brought with Yocto "Fido" can't set hostname supplied
> by DHCP on my Beaglebone:
>
> eth0: eth0: could not bring up interface:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2015, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Wed, 05.08.15 22:42, Thomas Meyer (tho...@m3y3r.de) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June
> > /032652.html
> >
> > "The official development
> > git
Hi systemd developers and users,
The systemd 219 brought with Yocto "Fido" can't set hostname supplied
by DHCP on my Beaglebone:
eth0: eth0: could not bring up interface:
Invalid argument
eth0: gained carrier
eth0: DHCPv4 address 192.168.205.87/24
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:57:14PM -0700, Chaiken, Alison wrote:
>
>
> The slides: http://she-devel.com/LISA15/LISA15_systemd.pdf
>
> Slides in other formats and systemd-nspawn containers in which to
> perform the exercises are available as well; tune to
> http://she-devel.com/ and look for
Hi
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Jin Liu wrote:
[...]
> I tried to start X the usual way - as root, via sddm display manager. It
> works fine. Seems the problem only happens when X is running as normal user.
> Any directions to investigate?
TBH, it sounds like an Xorg
I'm rolling my own initrd, and I'm trying to run a oneshot service in
initrd just before the switch root happens. I added this unit to the
initrd and enabled it.
[Unit]
Description=Test Unit
Requires=initrd-fs.target
After=initrd-fs.target
[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/bin/sh -c "echo
13 matches
Mail list logo