Re: [systemd-devel] nss-mymachines: slow name resolution

Am Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:28:19 +0100 schrieb Lennart Poettering : > On Sun, 14.02.16 13:49, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > I've followed the man page guide to setup mymachines name > > resolution in nsswitch.conf. It works. But it takes

Re: [systemd-devel] Is it possible to dynamically remove the "uaccess" tag?

Hey On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 14.02.16 19:18, Manuel Reimer (manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I want to create a daemon which translates inputs, given by an game >> controller (/dev/input/eventX). The default

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd default target

On Sat, 13.02.16 14:34, Pathangi Janardhanan (path.j...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I have some services configured with the above, Restart=on-failure and > StartLimitInterval/StartLimitBurst and also StartLimitAction with reboot. > > The problem I am trying to look at is, how to get out of a

Re: [systemd-devel] nss-mymachines: slow name resolution

On Sun, 14.02.16 13:49, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello! > > I've followed the man page guide to setup mymachines name resolution in > nsswitch.conf. It works. But it takes around 4-5 seconds to resolve a > name. This is unexpected and cannot be used in production. This sounds

Re: [systemd-devel] Is it possible to dynamically remove the "uaccess" tag?

On Sun, 14.02.16 19:18, Manuel Reimer (manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de) wrote: > Hello, > > I want to create a daemon which translates inputs, given by an game > controller (/dev/input/eventX). The default is, that the tag "uaccess" is > set there. > > As soon as my daemon runs, I don't want to use

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v229

On Mon, 15.02.16 09:36, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > >> So, if I define, for example, RuntimeMaxSec=15s, that means unit should > >> stop its job in the interval=[0; 14.59]s and 15.00s will be interval > >> overflow with exit-code 'failure'. OK. But what if unit will stop

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v229

Hi, On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 12.02.16 23:12, Mikhail Kasimov (mikhail.kasi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> 12.02.2016 22:57, Lennart Poettering пишет: >> > On Fri, 12.02.16 22:28, Mikhail Kasimov (mikhail.kasi...@gmail.com) wrote: >>