Re: [systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Xen
Reindl Harald schreef op 16-04-16 21:25: > interesting that you do exactly the same the whole thread - after your > offlist mail about psychiatry may i suggest you disturb somewhere else? I knew you were a pig, but that doesn't matter. ___ systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.04.2016 um 21:23 schrieb Xen: Tobias Hunger schreef op 16-04-16 21:13: Am 16.04.2016 18:46 schrieb "Xen" mailto:l...@xenhideout.nl>>: And if you did need to write stuff: why not queue the changes and then apply them after the remount rw, if that is necessary? Create an overlay to /etc ;

Re: [systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Xen
Tobias Hunger schreef op 16-04-16 21:13: > > Am 16.04.2016 18:46 schrieb "Xen" >: >> And if you did need to write stuff: why not queue the changes and then >> apply them after the remount rw, if that is necessary? Create an overlay >> to /etc ;-), write stuff to the ove

Re: [systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Tobias Hunger
Am 16.04.2016 18:46 schrieb "Xen" : > And if you did need to write stuff: why not queue the changes and then > apply them after the remount rw, if that is necessary? Create an overlay > to /etc ;-), write stuff to the overlay, then remount, freeze access, > and write the changed files to the real /

Re: [systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Xen
Reindl Harald schreef op 16-04-16 19:13: > honestly: what about just create your own operating system and leave us > all in peace with endless mails mixing a dozen of rarely topics or just > use a distribution like RHEL/CentOS/Fedora where you can just use > ifup/ifdown scripts and tie MAC-address

Re: [systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Reindl Harald
honestly: what about just create your own operating system and leave us all in peace with endless mails mixing a dozen of rarely topics or just use a distribution like RHEL/CentOS/Fedora where you can just use ifup/ifdown scripts and tie MAC-address and interface-names togehter? > The only ot

[systemd-devel] PredictableInterfaceNames and Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Xen
Reindl was trying to give me links on Debian. Andrei alluded to the fact that the infrastructure has been removed. Indeed in systemd 215 in Debian the file /lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules still exists, but in 220 it was removed. The original solution was a persistent file wri

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

2016-04-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.04.2016 um 16:15 schrieb Xen: The backlash against this renaming may have been enormous but people just say "oh, that's political". Systemd in general has been the single thing with the most opposition in the history of Linux that I'm aware of. stop spreading uneducated nonsense, the NI

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

2016-04-16 Thread Xen
Reindl Harald schreef op 16-04-16 14:27: >> So at that point, I am immediately stuck. This was in large part about >> people who are NOT expert administrators, remember? > > they don't care about how their interfaces are named And this is the lie to begin with. You people say this so you can kee

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

2016-04-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.04.2016 um 14:20 schrieb Xen: So I deleted your email that belonged to this piece and then tried to find what you wrote about myself. But the beginning of it is of course that Debian/Ubuntu doesn't have "sysconfig" directory. I know OpenSUSE does, but Debian doesn't. that is all complet

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

2016-04-16 Thread Xen
Reindl Harald schreef op 16-04-16 12:07: > > > Am 16.04.2016 um 06:46 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov: >> 16.04.2016 03:14, Reindl Harald пишет: >>> >>> >>> Am 15.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Xen: If you cannot give me a default mapping automatically, why not allow me to generate one easily? Is th

[systemd-devel] Easier alternative to SystemCallFilter

2016-04-16 Thread Topi Miettinen
Hello, SystemCallFilter, while a nice feature, is not easy to use because there are hundreds of system calls to be managed. I'm proposing to add a simpler way to prepare seccomp filters (to complement SystemCallFilter), where the user can construct the filter by using predefined system call group

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

2016-04-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.04.2016 um 06:46 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov: 16.04.2016 03:14, Reindl Harald пишет: Am 15.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Xen: If you cannot give me a default mapping automatically, why not allow me to generate one easily? Is there a tool that can take the current device and produce the list I