On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 19.04.16 22:47, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> In some ancient bug or lkml I'd read a kernel maintainer say that the
>> hibernation image size isn't fixed, and might be less than RAM size
>> but could be a lit
On Thu, 21.04.16 16:06, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Lennart
>
> 2016-04-21 12:11 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> >> On second thought, maybe not such a good ide
Hi,
I have the following problem: I use systemd-networkd on an embedded ARM
board but we have several different network usecases (with or without
VLAN trunking, etc.) which need to be configurable.
Until now, I tried to create a KernelCommandLine Match constraint to
control which .network and .ne
On 19.04.2016 12:31, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>
> Here are my thought as the main dracut maintainer:
>
> To resume from a swap disk means, that you must not change any data on disk
> while doing so, because that change would go unnoticed by the kernel, which we
> want to resume. So basically assemblin
2016-04-21 16:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> Hi Lennart
>
> 2016-04-21 12:11 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
>>> On second thought, maybe not such a good idea as this would break
>>> h
Hi Lennart
2016-04-21 12:11 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
>> On second thought, maybe not such a good idea as this would break
>> hibernate on alternate initramfs generators, like init
On 20.04.2016 06:47, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
>>
>> So what precisely are you proposing? That we actively search for the
>> swap partition in the hibernate-resume generator?
>
> I think the main thing James is after, I know I'm in this
On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> > 2016-04-20 11:14 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> >>
> >> Here's the heuristics code logind uses to check whether hibernation
> >> shall be considered available or not:
> >>
> >> https:/
> >>>
> >>> For stopping after a duration you can use RuntimeMaxSec=, introduced in
> >>> v229.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks. The man page says:
> >>
> >>> If this is used and the service has been active for longer than the
> >>> specified
> >>> time it is terminated and put into a failure state
> >
>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.04.2016 um 17:29 schrieb Jamie Kitson:
>>>
>>> For stopping after a duration you can use RuntimeMaxSec=, introduced in
>>> v229.
>>
>>
>> Thanks. The man page says:
>>
>>> If this is used and the service has been active for lon
Am 20.04.2016 um 17:29 schrieb Jamie Kitson:
For stopping after a duration you can use RuntimeMaxSec=, introduced in
v229.
Thanks. The man page says:
If this is used and the service has been active for longer than the specified
time it is terminated and put into a failure state
and i
11 matches
Mail list logo
