Re: [systemd-devel] Can coredumpctl work independent of journald?

Additionally can we improve the journal log rotate system to keep the higher severity messages (like coredump) for longer duration and remove lower priority messages to get spaces. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:15 AM, P.R.Dinesh wrote: > Thank you Lennart, > I would like to

Re: [systemd-devel] Can coredumpctl work independent of journald?

Thank you Lennart, I would like to explain my system scenario. We are using systemd version 219. (Updating to 229 is in progress). Configured for persistent storage for both Journal and Coredump (Coredump is stored externallly) The logs and coredump are stored in another partition

Re: [systemd-devel] Using systemd --user to manage graphical sessions?

On Wed, 11 May 2016 12:13:45 -0400, Martin Pitt wrote: > Or is someone actually using systemd --user for graphical sessions > already and found a trick that I missed? I am! For several months now (and before that, I was still using systemd --user for graphical stuff, but not

Re: [systemd-devel] Using systemd --user to manage graphical sessions?

Hello Mantas, thanks for your reply! Mantas Mikulėnas [2016-05-11 19:54 +0300]: > AFAIK, the general idea of --user is that there's at most one graphical > session (per user) at a time, so things like $DISPLAY naturally become per > user. Right, I understand that. But that doesn't mean that

Re: [systemd-devel] resolved: use special nameservers for some domains

On Wed, 11.05.16 12:13, Felix Schwarz (felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu) wrote: > I'd like to know if resolved can redirect DNS queries for certain domains to > different name servers? Well, kinda. If you have multiple interfaces, and each interface has one or more DNS servers attached, and each

Re: [systemd-devel] network unit Match by router advertisement?

On Wed, 11.05.16 11:32, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi again all, > > TL;DR: would it be possible (or make sense) to have systemd Match rules for > network units that could match on some artifact of the network the link is > attached to like vlan tag, router advertisement, wireless

Re: [systemd-devel] default service restart action?

On Wed, 11.05.16 11:27, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi all, I'm in the midst of steeping myself in systemd docs as I prepare to > face lift a slew of services for Debian Jessie updates. > > As I read through things I'm starting to think through a number of new ways > I could

Re: [systemd-devel] Can coredumpctl work independent of journald?

On Wed, 11.05.16 20:31, P.R.Dinesh (pr.din...@gmail.com) wrote: > I have set the journald to be persistant and limit its size to 40MB. > I had a process coredumped and the coredump file is found in > /var/log/systemd/coredump > > When I run coredumpctl this coredump is not shown. > > Later I

Re: [systemd-devel] Using systemd --user to manage graphical sessions?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been experimenting with systemd --user as a possible replacement > for bringing up graphical user sessions. We currently bring up most of > that using upstart jobs (simple auto-restart on crashes,

[systemd-devel] network unit Match by router advertisement?

Hi again all, TL;DR: would it be possible (or make sense) to have systemd Match rules for network units that could match on some artifact of the network the link is attached to like vlan tag, router advertisement, wireless access point or gateway mac, etc.? So, the original motivation for this

[systemd-devel] default service restart action?

Hi all, I'm in the midst of steeping myself in systemd docs as I prepare to face lift a slew of services for Debian Jessie updates. As I read through things I'm starting to think through a number of new ways I could potentially reorganize some of our services, which is cool. With my ideas though

[systemd-devel] Using systemd --user to manage graphical sessions?

Hello all, I've been experimenting with systemd --user as a possible replacement for bringing up graphical user sessions. We currently bring up most of that using upstart jobs (simple auto-restart on crashes, rate limiting, per-job logging, fine-grained startup condition control). There is one

Re: [systemd-devel] Verify the gpg signature of the given tag

On 11.05.2016 10:36, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:57:05AM +0200, poma wrote: >> >> $ git tag --verify v229 >> object 95adafc428b5b4be0ddd4d43a7b96658390388bc >> type commit >> tag v229 >> tagger Lennart Poettering 1455208658 +0100 >> >> systemd 229 >> gpg:

Re: [systemd-devel] Verify the gpg signature of the given tag

On 11.05.2016 13:04, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:57 AM, poma wrote: > >> >> $ git tag --verify v229 >> object 95adafc428b5b4be0ddd4d43a7b96658390388bc >> type commit >> tag v229 >> tagger Lennart Poettering 1455208658

[systemd-devel] Can coredumpctl work independent of journald?

I have set the journald to be persistant and limit its size to 40MB. I had a process coredumped and the coredump file is found in /var/log/systemd/coredump When I run coredumpctl this coredump is not shown. Later I found that the core dump log is missing from the Journal ( the journal got

Re: [systemd-devel] Verify the gpg signature of the given tag

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:57 AM, poma wrote: > > $ git tag --verify v229 > object 95adafc428b5b4be0ddd4d43a7b96658390388bc > type commit > tag v229 > tagger Lennart Poettering 1455208658 +0100 > > systemd 229 > gpg: Signature made Thu 11 Feb

[systemd-devel] resolved: use special nameservers for some domains

I'd like to know if resolved can redirect DNS queries for certain domains to different name servers? rationale: I want to query a few DNS black lists but my provider's name servers have been blocked because they send too many queries to the BL. However my intended usage qualifies for the "free"

Re: [systemd-devel] Verify the gpg signature of the given tag

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:57:05AM +0200, poma wrote: > > $ git tag --verify v229 > object 95adafc428b5b4be0ddd4d43a7b96658390388bc > type commit > tag v229 > tagger Lennart Poettering 1455208658 +0100 > > systemd 229 > gpg: Signature made Thu 11 Feb 2016 05:37:38 PM CET

Re: [systemd-devel] Transaction contains conflicting jobs 'restart' and 'stop'

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Can't the stop of iptables be dropped because the service is already stopped > (or more likely not even present)? Isn't this the case already? I simplified your scenario, i.e. A conflicts B and C is part of both A

[systemd-devel] Verify the gpg signature of the given tag

$ git tag --verify v229 object 95adafc428b5b4be0ddd4d43a7b96658390388bc type commit tag v229 tagger Lennart Poettering 1455208658 +0100 systemd 229 gpg: Signature made Thu 11 Feb 2016 05:37:38 PM CET using RSA key ID 9C3485B0 gpg: Good signature from "Lennart Poettering