Re: [systemd-devel] PAM session hooks for independent session

2016-10-29 Thread Antoine Martin
On 29/10/16 22:20, Brian Kroth wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 07:02 Reindl Harald > wrote: > Am 29.10.2016 um 13:37 schrieb Antoine Martin: > > Just like "screen" or "tmux", we want to ensure that some xpra > sessions > >

Re: [systemd-devel] PAM session hooks for independent session

2016-10-29 Thread Brian Kroth
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 07:02 Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2016 um 13:37 schrieb Antoine Martin: > > Just like "screen" or "tmux", we want to ensure that some xpra sessions > > (aka "screen for X11", VNC-like but seamless) can survive when the user > > logs out > >

Re: [systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

2016-10-29 Thread Bjørn Forsman
On 1 October 2016 at 17:14, Bjørn Forsman wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 09:08, Bjørn Forsman wrote: >> I have a question/issue with the behaviour of (auto)mount units. >> [...] > > Bump. Bump again. Anyone? If systemd + automount isn't the

Re: [systemd-devel] PAM session hooks for independent session

2016-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.10.2016 um 13:37 schrieb Antoine Martin: Just like "screen" or "tmux", we want to ensure that some xpra sessions (aka "screen for X11", VNC-like but seamless) can survive when the user logs out which is not longer true

[systemd-devel] PAM session hooks for independent session

2016-10-29 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi, Just like "screen" or "tmux", we want to ensure that some xpra sessions (aka "screen for X11", VNC-like but seamless) can survive when the user logs out. Background: xpra runs X11 applications using an Xvfb server, when client(s) are connected we forward the pixels/keyboard/mouse/etc. Based