03.04.2017 10:52, Michal Sekletar пишет:
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, current systemd should behave as you want since
>> commit 9d06297. If you want this commit to be backported, you need to
>> contact your distribution.
>
> 9d06297 changed be
> Note that "networkctl status ..." will actually show you the link file
> applied to a specific interface. What does it show for yours?
>
> Lennart
It shows "/usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link", despite the presence of my
earlier named 10-eth0.link file.
The initramfs for Fedora contains
On Sat, 01.04.17 20:45, Chris Trobridge (christrobri...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> $cat /etc/systemd/network/10-eth0.link
> [Match]
> #OriginalName=eth0
> MACAddress=08:00:27:57:f6:40
>
> [Link]
> Name=eno1
>
> $ dmesg | grep eth0
> [1.636915] e1000 :00:03.0 eth0: (PCI:33MHz:32-bit) 08:00:27:
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> As far as I can tell, current systemd should behave as you want since
> commit 9d06297. If you want this commit to be backported, you need to
> contact your distribution.
9d06297 changed behavior only for mount units created from
/proc/mou
