Re: [systemd-devel] time-sync.target

2017-05-30 Thread Luke Shumaker
On Tue, 30 May 2017 11:57:00 -0400, Pietro Paolini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I am trying to configure my systemd to run my service *after* the > timesyncd service is synchronized with the NTP server, unfortunately > adding the "After=time-sycd.target" does not work as I can't see any > change in

Re: [systemd-devel] socket unit refusing connection when JOB_STOP is pending

2017-05-30 Thread Moravec, Stanislav (ERT)
Uoti, yes, it was about Redhat/Centos7 authd (rfc 1413) service, so it was the latter - one child process per each connection: auth@.service:[Unit] auth@.service:Description=Authd Ident Protocol Requests Server auth@.service:After=local-fs.target auth@.service: auth@.service:[Service]

Re: [systemd-devel] socket unit refusing connection when JOB_STOP is pending

2017-05-30 Thread Uoti Urpala
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 18:07 +, Moravec, Stanislav (ERT) wrote: > OK. Understood, thanks much! > We'll try to follow up on using some parent process (xinetd or something like > that). BTW your problem description wasn't very clear. Is your specific problem case about socket activation of

Re: [systemd-devel] socket unit refusing connection when JOB_STOP is pending

2017-05-30 Thread Moravec, Stanislav (ERT)
OK. Understood, thanks much! We'll try to follow up on using some parent process (xinetd or something like that). Eventually however, this is a limitation that prohibits using systemd as full init replacement and should be addressed in some way sooner or later, I guess. Thanks again Stan

[systemd-devel] time-sync.target

2017-05-30 Thread Pietro Paolini
Hi everybody, I am trying to configure my systemd to run my service *after* the timesyncd service is synchronized with the NTP server, unfortunately adding the "After=time-sycd.target" does not work as I can't see any change in the behavior - my service is started immediately anyway. Reading

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-05-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 30.05.17 11:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2017-05-30 10:55 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : > > On Tue, May 30 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > >> 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : > >> > >>> +.B bg > >>> +option is not supported, and may be

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-05-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 30.05.17 08:19, NeilBrown (ne...@suse.com) wrote: > > Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly. > It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting. > > Explain this. > > See also https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6046 > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-05-30 Thread Michael Biebl
2017-05-30 10:55 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : > On Tue, May 30 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : >> >>> +.B bg >>> +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list. >> >> Either systemd is updated to actually strip the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-05-30 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, May 30 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : > >> +.B bg >> +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list. > > Either systemd is updated to actually strip the bg option or not. The > documentation should reflect that. > I

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-05-30 Thread Michael Biebl
2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown : > +.B bg > +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list. Either systemd is updated to actually strip the bg option or not. The documentation should reflect that. I don't think we should be vague about this, as it would