Re: [systemd-devel] Best way to run upstream systemd

2018-08-01 Thread ChenQi
On 07/19/2018 06:26 AM, Juanjo Presa wrote: I wonder which ways are to run last systemd versions? nowadays Im running Centos 7 with systemd facebook backports (https://github.com/facebookincubator/rpm-backports). But maybe you guys have another way, NixOs? Archlinux? Tyvm.

Re: [systemd-devel] Supervisory Watchdog notification not working when using SmackProcessLabel

2018-08-01 Thread Martin Townsend
Hi Casey, Thanks you for you prompt response. On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:32 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > > On 8/1/2018 3:18 AM, Martin Townsend wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a service running with a SmackProcessLabel that uses the > > supervisory watchdog feature, ie calls sd_notify(). The

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about the default value of NamePolicy=

2018-08-01 Thread Mantas Mikul─Śnas
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:18 PM Francis Moreau wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question regarding the default value of NamePolicy= defined > in 99-default.link. > > The value is "NamePolicy=kernel database onboard slot path" > > Could someone explain me why "onbard" is preferred over "slot" which >

Re: [systemd-devel] Supervisory Watchdog notification not working when using SmackProcessLabel

2018-08-01 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 8/1/2018 3:18 AM, Martin Townsend wrote: > Hi, > > I have a service running with a SmackProcessLabel that uses the > supervisory watchdog feature, ie calls sd_notify(). The Watchdog > keeps resetting the service and I get the following in the journal > > Jul 27 11:36:11 kernel: audit:

[systemd-devel] Question about the default value of NamePolicy=

2018-08-01 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I have a question regarding the default value of NamePolicy= defined in 99-default.link. The value is "NamePolicy=kernel database onboard slot path" Could someone explain me why "onbard" is preferred over "slot" which is preferred over "path" ? Thanks. -- Francis

[systemd-devel] Supervisory Watchdog notification not working when using SmackProcessLabel

2018-08-01 Thread Martin Townsend
Hi, I have a service running with a SmackProcessLabel that uses the supervisory watchdog feature, ie calls sd_notify(). The Watchdog keeps resetting the service and I get the following in the journal Jul 27 11:36:11 kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(1532691371.270:34): lsm=SMACK

Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu 16.04 systemd: Failed to send signal

2018-08-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 01.08.18 09:31, Liu, Shuang (ADITG/ESM) (s...@de.adit-jv.com) wrote: > Hi, > > Does somebody has clue on the below issue? > Ubuntu 16.04, systemd 229, D-Bus 1.10.6 > Thanks. You turned on debug logging. If you do not you won't see it. It just means that systemd tried to send a bus