Re: [systemd-devel] Shared limit for different cgroups

2019-03-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 06.03.19 14:32, Frank Steiner (fsteiner-ma...@bio.ifi.lmu.de) wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to impose a general memory maximum limit to all processes > started by our users. These include everything started interactively > from the shell, but also cgis from apache and jobs started in grid. >

[systemd-devel] Shared limit for different cgroups

2019-03-06 Thread Frank Steiner
Hi, I'd like to impose a general memory maximum limit to all processes started by our users. These include everything started interactively from the shell, but also cgis from apache and jobs started in grid. The limit should not hold for each user, but it should be an overall limit for all users

Re: [systemd-devel] StartLimitBurst/StartLimitInterval not getting enforced

2019-03-06 Thread prashantkumar dhotre
Follow up On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:59 PM prashantkumar dhotre < prashantkumardho...@gmail.com> wrote: > But the doc says > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html > " however, they apply to all kinds of starts (including manual), not just > those triggered by

Re: [systemd-devel] How to set custom default target permanently?

2019-03-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 05.03.19 12:16, ashitha v (ash15...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > How can I change the default.target to a custom.target permanently? When > the image is booting, it is set to multi-user.target by creating a symlink > from /etc/systemd/system/default.target. If I do systemctl set-default >

Re: [systemd-devel] Effect of reset-failed on service that is not in failed state

2019-03-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 06.03.19 11:15, prashantkumar dhotre (prashantkumardho...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > Is there any side-effect of the 'reset-failed' operation on a service that > is not in failed state. > My understanding is , in that case, it is no-op. It mostly is. But note that it will reset a few more

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: serving method call message in a separate thread

2019-03-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 05.03.19 20:46, Stanislav Angelovič (angelovi...@gmail.com) wrote: > > To do that, allocate a single mutex of some form covering the sd_bus > > object and all sd_bus_message associated with it. You need to take the > > lock when you enter any sd_bus_xyz call, and release it after. To > >

[systemd-devel] a solution to the throughput loss caused by I/O-bandwidth management

2019-03-06 Thread Paolo Valente
Hi, I'm a developer of the BFQ I/O scheduler [1, 2]. Some of you guys care about guaranteeing (also) I/O bandwidth to groups, containers and so on, so I thought that you might be interested in the results I bumped into, while working on I/O control. I found out that the techniques used to