Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this
outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred way
going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.h instead?
I manage an embedded product that leverages system heavily at the system le
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser
mailto:igei...@devonit.com>> wrote:
> Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this
> outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred
> way going forward? Or should
On 08/19/2015 11:32 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ian Geiser mailto:igei...@devonit.com>> wrote:
...snip...
Not quite; …/systemd/private is not even a bus – it's a direct
peer-to-peer connection to systemd, providing just that one service. (It
i
Greetings, I have a template unit for different demon configurations that I
want to switch between. I was able to easily make a template unit foo@.service
that just calls "foo -c /etc/%i.conf", so now I can say foo@config1.service and
it works as expected. My problem now is that if I do foo@co
I have a similar problem, but from what I can tell with the current
templates this is not possible. I ended up using an internal script
that would loop over the process.
On 09/18/2015 02:34 PM, Dmitry Karpov wrote:
I have a template for creating the backup:
backup@.service
[Unit]
Descripti
Greetings, I am working on an embedded system where I load the users pace
rootfs off of a loop device. I then use AUFS to put tmpfs overlay on it and
then switch root into that. Currently systemd works like a champ getting
through the initramfs. It correctly mounts the loop device, tmpfs and
