Hello,
When I build systemd from git using the usual procedure of configure,
without setting special parameters, it installs folder under
/usr/etc/systemd/ (like /usr/etc/systemd/system and its children,
/usr/etc/systemd/network/, and more).
Is there a way to run configure so that, instead of
Thanks, Zbyszek.
--prefix etc.
I assume you mean:
--prefix /etc
and not
prefix /etc
is it so ?
KW
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
Hello,
When I build systemd from git
Hi all,
Thanks for the quick response from all responders; I was afraid that
etc here was indeed in a different context than a path
regards,
KW
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:02:37PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote
Hello,
I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page and
ran it by:
systemd-nspawn -D/srv/mycontainer
I killed it by pkill systemd-nspaw (and not by poweroff from within the
container).
Now, running machinectl shows that the container still runs:
machinectl
MACHINE
Hi,
I tried again and now it did work.
maybe I was wrong somewhere, sorry.
KW
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:35:19PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
Hello,
I had created a container according to systemd-nspwan man page
Hi,
I noticed this fact:
For the following source modules:
src/test/test-sched-prio.c
src/test/test-sched-prio.c
src/test/test-unit-file.c
src/test/test-unit-name.c
There are the following object files:
test_sched_prio-test-sched-prio.o
test_cgroup_mask-test-cgroup-mask.o
Hello,
Why are there two git trees:
one in
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd
and the second in
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
It seems to me that the first one is the primary one, and there
are cases when the second tree is not yet synchronized with the
first one (which might
Hello,
On Fedora 18, running:
mount | grep release
gives:
cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup
(rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,release_agent=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd)
I know and have tried cgroup release_agent;
I also noticed that notify_on_release is enabled
Hello,
I have a question about systemd and cgroups:
mount | grep cgroups shows that only one entry has name=systemd.
and is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd . (see below the full output
of mount | grep cgroups
Is it true that all other cgroup entry shown by mount | grep cgroups
were not mounted
Thanks!
KV
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Wilson wkev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a default fedore 18 machine with default kernel. Kernel came
with the F18 disto, no changes. No special things like LXC/OpenVZ
sure, and
ps aux | g systemd-cgroups-agent
returns nothing.
Any ideas?
rgs
Kevin
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 09.04.13 16:39, Kevin Wilson (wkev...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
On Fedora 18, running:
mount | grep release
wrote:
On Tue, 16.04.13 20:45, Kevin Wilson (wkev...@gmail.com) wrote:
cat /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd/system/bluetooth.service/tasks
671
Apr 16 20:40:05 localhost systemd[1]: bluetooth.service: main process
exited, code=killed, status=9/KILL
Apr 16 20:40:05 localhost systemd[1]: Unit
Hello, systemd developers,
I have a short question about name=systemd cgroup mount option.
Would systemd work without specifying this mount option ?
what is the reason for using this cgroup mount option ?
regards,
Kevin
___
systemd-devel mailing list
Hi,
I can set a hostname with
hostnamectl set-hostname --static newHostname
I have a DNS domain server in my local LAN. so
when I restart the machine, it gets this full hostname, which can be
displayed by
hostname -f
newHostname.mydomanName
and hostname alone shows
newHostname
Is there
Hi everyone,
I had a Fedora 20 Machine (x86_64) on which I installed the
latest 4.4 kernel released this week (I had built it from source). It
had systemd 208.
I wanted to test cgroup v2 (not in relation to systemd). In order to
be able to activate
cgoupv2 memory and cgroup controllers, the
ices.
Kevin
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Lennart Poettering
<lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 15.01.16 22:17, Kevin Wilson (wkev...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I had a Fedora 20 Machine (x86_64) on which I installed the
>> latest 4
Hello, systemd developers,
So we have now 3 V2 cgroups controller in the kernel (pids, memory and io).
The CPU controller as of now is not merged in and is available only in
an out of tree git repo (due to some debate over
it with kernel scheduler developers). Not sure that it will be merged
in
Hello, Daniel,
> We don't want to support out of tree kernel patches,
This sounds very reasonable, I don't have anything against this policy.
Still, I wonder: are you ruling out implementing "hybrid mode" (like
Lennart uses in systemd) for libvirt? I mean a mode where you will use
the 3
18 matches
Mail list logo
