Re: [systemd-devel] Does systemctl unmask enables a service also?

On Sat, Jul 17, 2021, 22:23 Debraj Manna wrote: > Hi > > I have read this article > and it appears to > me that unmasking and starting a service should also enable it back. But on > trying it does not appear to happen like that > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Does After=systemd-udevd.service make my service run after the services started by udev rules?

p after it has already declared "ready". -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Mounting a new device to a mount point with an old (auto-generated) but inactive mount unit triggers an immediate unmount

"Warning: myfancyservice.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl > daemon-reload' to reload units." > systemd can't make non-systemd tools (such as `mount`) display warnings. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Restricting swap usage for a process managed via systemd

; drwxr-xr-x 87 root root 0 Jul 2 15:05 system.slice > drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Jun 30 15:22 user.slice > ubuntu@vrni-platform:/tmp/debraj$ sudo umount /tmp/tuk > > Can someone suggest what configuration I am missing? > > > ___ > systemd-devel mailing

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd]: sd-sync lead to kernel panic

in/sync` from shell, since it does exactly the same thing. In general there should be nothing special about systemd calling sync(), it's purely a kernel problem. The only difference that I can think of is that systemd begins the sync() while all services are shutt

Re: [systemd-devel] /var/lib/machines

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021, 14:06 Johannes Köhler wrote: > Hi systemd maintainer, again! > > with my last post i got a hint to > follow the netiquette. My netiquette > with now, was: read manpages and html > searches before asking stupid questions... :) > > So to say, i am happy about private messages

Re: [systemd-devel] Alias for SMTP providers [ie. mutually exclusive service alternatives]

utdown and if the goal of After=postfix is "run my ExecStop before postfix gets stopped", then ability to queue doesn't help all that much. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Why are core dumps named vgcore.*?

dumpctl is fine with missing/removed coredump files -- that's part of the normal operation; actual dumps are cleaned out much faster than the corresponding journal entries. You'll probably already see some of them marked "missing" in the list. -- Mantas Mikulėnas

Re: [systemd-devel] What is the recommended way of announcing a TCP port?

If you only care about processes on the same system – why not put the actual socket in /run, as an AF_UNIX socket? That's mostly what /run is for. On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, 04:18 John Ioannidis wrote: > I have an instanced service that gets started and stopped by another > service: *alice.service

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd.socket man pages update suggestion

". > > Add: > One or more of the associated service files > StandardInput/StandardOutput/StandardError options should be set to > socket for this option to work. > IMHO that is a bit odd. I don't really see the reason why the option wouldn't work with any Accept

Re: [systemd-devel] Script in system-sleep that makes an HTTP post

perror doesn't define exit statuses. It defines syscall return codes and libc function errno values, which usually have nothing to do with the exit code of the whole process. Aside from the convention that "non-zero = failure", you have to look at the docs of the whole program (e.g. if it's a

Re: [systemd-devel] Fwd: syntax checker

/var/run/log ramfs... > That's already the default if /var/log doesn't exist. To ensure /run is always used, you should set "Storage=volatile" in journald.conf. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: [systemd-devel] Adding USB ID to hwdb/usb.ids

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 08:04 Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 09:38:37PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am Di., 1. Juni 2021 um 20:44 Uhr schrieb Greg KH < > gre...@linuxfoundation.org>: > > > Works for me! Make sure you are not trying to connect to 'https'. > > > > No https? Why? > >

Re: [systemd-devel] DHCP6 client failing when /etc is mounted as overlayfs

ngs which use the machine-id anyway... > Thanks > > -- > Alessandro Tagliapietra > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 12:13 AM Mantas Mikulėnas > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:07 AM Alessandro Tagliapietra < >> tagliapietra.alessan...@gmail.com> wrote: >&

Re: [systemd-devel] DHCP6 client failing when /etc is mounted as overlayfs

: Failed to set DUID-EN: No medium found > eth0: DHCP6 CLIENT: Failed to set DUID: No medium found > My guess is that it's related to /etc/machine-id somehow becoming inaccessible, since networkd's DUID-EN (DUIDType=vendor) is based on that. -- Mantas Mikulėnas _

Re: [systemd-devel] socket activation socket state

ttps://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

[systemd-devel] On the IRC situation

ative). So if there are no objections I'll make a PR to update systemd's README files to "s/ freenode.org/libera.chat/g" sometime later. -- Mantas Mikulėnas (grawity) ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.

Re: [systemd-devel] Alias for template/instance service unit

o other features: 1. Custom target units, which allow you to *start* all instances at once; 2. Wildcard support in `systemctl` commands, which allows you to see the status of all loaded instances at once (systemctl status "foo@*.service"). -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] "Correct" way to obtain DHCP lease info?

in the network? (If it's to check that the physical interface is working, then just the fact that you somehow acquired a lease would be enough. no?) -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolve SERVFAIL on lookups found by upstream DNS server

re making the query from.) I *think* this was fixed in git a few weeks ago. There's already an Ubuntu bug report for the same issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1921636 -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] Q: asymmetry of ExecStop and ExecStart

itionPathExists=/usr/bin/... > > > > [Service] > > Type=oneshot > > TimeoutSec=10 > > ExecStart=/usr/bin/... > > > > Type=oneshot services go from "starting" directly to "dead"; they are > never active and so there is nothing to stop. >

Re: [systemd-devel] .local searches not working

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021, 02:02 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021, 22:28 Phillip Susi wrote: > >> >> Silvio Knizek writes: >> >> > So in fact your network is not standard conform. You have to define >> > .local as search and routing domain

Re: [systemd-devel] .local searches not working

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021, 22:28 Phillip Susi wrote: > > Silvio Knizek writes: > > > So in fact your network is not standard conform. You have to define > > .local as search and routing domain in the configuration of sd- > > resolved. > > Interesting... so what are you supposed to name your local,

Re: [systemd-devel] Is it meant to be possible to set IO[Read|Write]BandwidthMax on a slice ?

cgroups v2, and vice versa. (Hmm, wasn't there an option to choose which controllers to assign to v1 and which ones to v2?) -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Session-specific user services

s like it would make it *less* useful with two sessions, because you would have no way to run a second instance for the other session anyway. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] help with sockets and services and inetd-like workflows

I would suggest adding StandardError=journal, so that you get to see the Python exceptions when they happen. On Mon, Mar 22, 2021, 04:21 Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm running systemd 241-7~deb10u6, Debian 10 (Buster). > > I am attempting to have an inetd like service run, where

Re: [systemd-devel] Activate netdev only on demand (e.g. for wireguard connection)

0/0 because I don't know the "wanted" destinations in advance, but at the same time I don't want the system to *default* to sending all my traffic halfway around the world and back, so it has to be "on demand". People are in a hurry to suggest "openvpn is meh, use wg-quick" a

Re: [systemd-devel] Q; syslog.socket dependency

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021, 13:17 Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > I have a unit that uses logger, and I want to run it after syslog is > available. So I added syslog.socket as dependency, but it fails: > Mar 11 12:11:02 jeos1 systemd[1]: syslog.socket: Socket service > syslog.service not loaded,

Re: [systemd-devel] use RTC date/time to set system date time

Normally I think systemd expects the kernel to do this on its own. On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 12:31 Belisko Marek wrote: > Hi, > > I have a case when a board boots without network connection but RTC > have the correct date/time. Does systemd use RTC date/time to set > systemd time or it needs to be

Re: [systemd-devel] Looking for known memory leaks triggered by stress testing add/remove/up/down interfaces

ned/published long after the commits to fix the issues > are made. We cannot retroactively change git commits, that's just not > how this works. > This *could* work with git notes, it seems --grep searches them as well. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] timedate1 permissions

nge the time and timezone? > > Regards, > Greg Wilson-Lindberg > ___ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > -- Mantas Mikulėnas __

Re: [systemd-devel] timesyncd log messages galore

afterwards. Currently it has recorded 1.988s total CPU usage after 12 days of uptime. > So the punchline is, that timesynd is not really usable with ipv6 > networks? Am I getting that correct? > No, sounds more like it's just not really usable with *your* IPv6

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolved only returns v6 addresses

Tatschner wrote: > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 13:10 +0200, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > So it is entirely possible that when resolved makes two queries, one > > for A records and another for , it receives conflicting > > information about the target simultaneously being an al

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolved only returns v6 addresses

___ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Why systemd-nspawn is slower than docker, podman and qemu?! how to Improve nspawn performance?

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, 12:56 Badr Elmers wrote: > Hi, > Why nspawn is slow compared to docker podman and even qemu?! > CPU tasks take twice of the time it takes in docker, podman or qemu > > here I filled a request to improve nspawn performance which contain the > steps and the full test result:

Re: [systemd-devel] automount behavior with multiple IPS

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021, 20:58 Weatherby,Gerard wrote: > When systemd-automount queries an NFS server with multiple IPs, does it > try all of the them (the default behavior of the similar autofs package) or > just use one, or something else? > Systemd does not have any special handling for NFS –

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: successful mount starts a service - how?

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 09:50 Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 19.01.2021 um 06:30 > in > Nachricht <3a365c71-004e-031e-4153-80c376d80...@gmail.com>: > > 19.01.2021 04:00, lejeczek пишет: > >> hi guys. > >> > >> I'm fiddling with it but have run out of options/ideas. > >>

Re: [systemd-devel] service killed when usb device reloaded

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021, 20:17 Belisko Marek wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing a strange issue. I have gsm modem and when modem is > restarted (removed from usb bus and plugged back) one of services is > restarted (with enabled systemd debug level): > > Jan 07 09:07:00 device systemd[1]: Received SIGCHLD

Re: [systemd-devel] SystemD dependency problem

ering loop: * yourthing.service has no After=, but it runs `docker` commands and cannot finish until docker.service is up; * docker.service explicitly has After=network-online.target and won't start until that target is reached; * but network-online.target has an implicit After=yourthing.service (as

Re: [systemd-devel] Udev rules on reboot

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020, 21:37 Adi Ml wrote: > Yes. Thats exactly what I mean (what mantas said)- ATTR{authorized}="0". > I would like to have a usb whitelist via udev and want it to be enforced on > devices which connected pre boot too. > > authorized_default=0- it seems the same like >

Re: [systemd-devel] Mount options for ESP, LUKS and rootfs in automatic partition discovery and mounting

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 3:49 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sa, 19.12.20 15:31, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > THere's an RFE issue open asking to support rootflags= on the kernel > > > cmdline for the automatically discovered rootfs (that's the

Re: [systemd-devel] Udev rules on reboot

t;? What do you mean by that? I am not following... > I suspect they mean something like ATTR{authorized}="0", which tells the kernel to completely ignore that USB device. (Though it's more common to set authorized_default=0 on all hubs, then allow only trusted devi

Re: [systemd-devel] Mount options for ESP, LUKS and rootfs in automatic partition discovery and mounting

On Sat, Dec 19, 2020, 14:40 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sa, 28.11.20 01:26, Bastien Traverse (neit...@esrevart.net) wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Is it possible to specify mount options for ESP, root and LUKS devices > when > > using automatic partition discovery and mounting with no

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: add instruction on clearing file descriptors

I'm not sure if it's more portable. I recall FreeBSD only exposing 0–2 in its /dev/fd by default unless you mounted a separate virtual filesystem there. NetBSD seems to always have 64 devnodes no matter how many fds. I don't think there's a *good* portable method (which is why closerange() is

Re: [systemd-devel] Timestamps in journal during suspend/resume

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 2:31 PM Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:46 PM Paul Menzel < > pmenzel+systemd-de...@molgen.mpg.de> wrote: > >> >> At least to me, some of the entries with timestamps from resuming should >> have timestamps from suspend

Re: [systemd-devel] Timestamps in journal during suspend/resume

ch does not advance at all while the system is suspended -- so trying to convert it to realtime will often give wrong results (the same problem as in 'dmesg -e') unless you do something smart with combining it with journald's __REALTIME_TIMESTAMP. -- Mantas Mikulėnas __

Re: [systemd-devel] Order between systemd-networkd and udev

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, 23:25 Zheng, Fam wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in systemd-networkd.service we have > > After=... systemd-udevd.service ... > > I know the point of it has been for tuntap as pointed out by comments > above, but I do wonder what ensures the ordering of NIC drivers (as > loaded

Re: [systemd-devel] Mounting / as writable without in `/etc/fstab`

ow your distro's initramfs wants to work, but at least that's what Arch does -- since fsck is run from the initramfs, there's not much point in later mounting it ro at all. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] How to turn off the ntp time synchronization in default when power on

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 21:43 An Liu wrote: > HI > > timedatectl set-ntp false > > > what is the diff between this and > systemctl disable ntp > The timedatectl command controls only systemd's own NTP client (systemd-timesyncd.service). It doesn't care about other NTP clients such as

Re: [systemd-devel] state of journal-upload and journal-remote?

the journal for logs and > forward them on their own, without using any of the > journal-upload/journal-remote stuff… > I'm less sure about the HTTP bits, but I think journal-remote can be useful on its own, as it also takes input from stdin (doing the opposite of

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd.automount issue: Failed to initialize automounter: Operation not permitted

Automounts themselves are established by a magic kernel-level mount (specifically they're "autofs" mounts), which requires root privileges. Your systemd --user instance runs unprivileged, as your own UID, and doesn't have the privilege to mount autofs (or anything else that isn't FUSE). On Tue,

Re: [systemd-devel] Journald retaining logs for only 10 days

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020, 20:17 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:31 AM Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I just discovered that on one of my systems journald only retains log >> entries for about 10 days: >> >> # journalctl | head -

Re: [systemd-devel] Journald retaining logs for only 10 days

(Which is still not quite the same as 2.4 GB of *.journal files, but there's always going to be some discrepancy due to how a binary database allocates space.) -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] How to dynamically retrieve my service name?

gt; Best regards, > Etienne Doms > ___ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > -- Mantas Mikulėnas _

Re: [systemd-devel] ssh.service in rescue.target

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 23:31 Phillip Susi wrote: > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > Are you running systemd? If so, please get rid of "killproc". It will > > interfere with systemd's service management. > > I see.. apparently Ubuntu still has it around. How does systemd handle > it? For

Re: [systemd-devel] ssh.service in rescue.target

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 18:38 Phillip Susi wrote: > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > What is "killprocs"? > > > > Is something killing services behind systemd's back? What's that > > about? > > It's the thing that kills all remaining processes right before shutdown > that we've had since the

Re: [systemd-devel] DisplayPort display non-persistent device naming

It could be either, but these names are assigned by the kernel – not by udev. On Thu, Oct 29, 2020, 22:53 Marcin Kocur wrote: > Hello, > > this is the output of turning off and on my display (using power button): > > > [mk@linux ~]$ udevadm monitor > monitor will print the received events for:

Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl reboot/halt with non-privilege user

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020, 13:40 An Liu wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I used to type systemctl reboot with non-privileged users, and to my > surprise, the system goes down for the reboot. > > I've tested in both debian and centos 7, they act the same, however, > systemctl halt will prompt you to enter

Re: [systemd-devel] Crond session, pam_access and pam_systemd

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Thomas HUMMEL wrote: > > On 16/10/2020 13:22, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > > But I think you're still confusing the two different kinds of "sessions" > > that exist here. PAM open_session creates a PAM session, which > > eventua

Re: [systemd-devel] Crond session, pam_access and pam_systemd

o PAM not authorizing it (or due to some other reason), this will still not prevent pam_systemd from registering the session and creating user-.slice and making it appear in `loginctl`. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Crond session, pam_access and pam_systemd

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 8:16 PM Thomas HUMMEL wrote: > Thanks for your answer. Still I'm quite confused. > > On 12/10/2020 18:21, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > > > It's a worker process which calls pam_open_session() and > > pam_close_session() on behalf of the user@.s

Re: [systemd-devel] Crond session, pam_access and pam_systemd

tially they provide very similar functions, especially with linger active. I also noticed that if the user gets lingered there is no such error > message (which makes me think about the creation of the crond session > through the systemd --user instance running a job) > Linger means the --use

Re: [systemd-devel] Q on serial-getty

; "unlimited", why not use that string? > This was fixed in systemd-235 several years ago. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/21771f338d268e06dc9a10b9b08b14ff8217d4be -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Q: logrotate and "systemctl kill -s HUP ..."

reload foo.service`. Sending HUP to ExecStartPre and ExecStartPost doesn't make sense, since those are supposed to be short-running commands – they are not allowed to actually *have* daemons. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] 99-default.link which such a high number ?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 17:46 Francis Moreau wrote: > Hello, > > I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need > to create a file starting with "99-" prefix. > > This doesn't seem logical to me because the numbers are supposed to > encode the priority however nothing is

Re: [systemd-devel] spurious failures of resolved

link: usb0 > > -- Information acquired via protocol DNS in 5.8ms. > -- Data is authenticated: no > > Did I misconfigure something? Did I misread resolved.conf(5) which states > “Use > the construct "~." to use the system DNS server defined with DNS= > preferabl

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd doesn't see ttyPS0 devices from udev

doesn't properly inform systemd about the new device. > >What does "udevadm info -a /dev/ttyPS0" output? > I can not get a console from ttyPS0, so I can not run "udevadm info -a > /dev/ttyPS0" in the target(xilinx pynq) board. > Try booting wit

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd doesn't see ttyPS0 devices from udev

s, but that should have been already covered by the existing upstream rules: 99-systemd.rules:12:SUBSYSTEM=="tty", KERNEL=="*tty[a-zA-Z]**|hvc*|xvc*|hvsi*|ttysclp*|sclp_line*|3270/tty[0-9]*", TAG+="systemd" -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-encrypt is a little painful

ke Kai *has* configured it that way, otherwise sd-encrypt wouldn't have had any effect whatsoever. "sd-encrypt" is the mkinitcpio module (hook) which adds the standard systemd-cryptsetup(-generator) & systemd-ask-password binaries. systemd-gpt-auto-generator should work, as it ge

Re: [systemd-devel] Journal message timestamps

ame first by comparing boot > ids. But that would still not be perfect since we could write that out > only late (i.e. after /var becomes writable), so the order before that > could not be reconstructed either if the system doesn't get that far. > Hmm, but if there's no /var in

Re: [systemd-devel] howto switch from grub2-bios to systemd-boot

S laptop I've already had problems after merely adding/deleting boot entries too many times, and I *would not* want a write to happen on every single boot. As much as I distrust the FAT implementations in my computers' firmwares, I still trust them a little bit more than their EFI variable NVRAM m

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Journal message timestamps

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 10:06 Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Mark Corbin schrieb am 27.08.2020 um 12:33 in > Nachricht > : > > Hello > > > > I am working on time synchronisation issues at boot for systems without > > an RTC (using balenaOS on a Raspberry Pi 3) and have some questions > > about how

Re: [systemd-devel] protecting sshd against forkbombs, excessive memory usage by other processes

number of processes/tasks (the default in user-.slice.d is TasksMax=33% of...something, but it could be lowered to e.g. 10% or to 4096) without affecting the service itself. So I'm sure that sshd.service and user-0.slice could be tweaked somehow to give root a higher priority at cgroup level,

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-networkd and interface names

That seems to be working as expected. The initial, kernel-assigned name is always going to be an incrementing eth#, wlan#, or something similar. It's up to the userspace (i.e. udev) to rename it to something custom. However, interfaces can only be renamed while they're *not* up, otherwise the

Re: [systemd-devel] Wrong interface name

t; The kernel does not remember anything across reboots. The only way to make a custom name persistent is to rename it from userspace every single time (e.g. udev rules). -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Upstreaming systemd patch

t; Pull requests are usually made from your own personal repository. Use Github's "Fork" feature to get a writable copy of the repository, then `git remote add` its URL and push there. For example: git remote add fork https://github.com//systemd git push -u fork -- Mantas Mikulėn

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd.timer every X days?

I'd create a single raidcheck.service that runs daily and calls a script that itself determines which device to check, e.g. /dev/md$[dayofyear % 16]. On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 22:56 Ian Pilcher wrote: > My NAS has 16 MD RAID devices. I've created a simple service > (raidcheck@.service) that will

Re: [systemd-devel] vt220 default for serial console still relevant?

will just show up as garbage on screen. Google tells me VT421 supported sixel graphics. I'm not sure if any programs make use of that nowadays, but if they do, then trying to use TERM=vt421 with a terminal that doesn't do sixel will result in more garbage on screen. There are various other differen

Re: [systemd-devel] Child of daemon sending SIGCHLD to systemd

ith simple, other daemons wouldn't be able to properly order After=freecusd, but with Type=notify you only need to call sd_notify("READY=1") at the proper moment.) -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] dev-mmcblk0p2.device delay

ts marked as "active (plugged)" when udev's rule processing for that device finishes. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] howto switch from grub2-bios to systemd-boot

sical > ext4 partition or is it required that the kernel and initrd live on the > EFI partition too? > For systemd-boot, the kernel is required to be on the same EFI partition. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@

Re: [systemd-devel] networkd: how to match the only interface?

claimed. If you have multiple, one of them will still be "eth0" and will still get the IP address... you just can't be sure *which *one. (They might even swap after a reboot.) -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] --Reboot-- lines in journal

and it also stops the search completely if it finds a boot ID that it has already seen. (What do you get from, let's say, `journalctl -o json | jq -r "._BOOT_ID" | uniq -c`? Does it show several distinct ranges for each boot ID?) -- Mantas Mikulėnas __

Re: [systemd-devel] Extend service runtime

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:19 AM Andy Pieters wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 23:11, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > >> >> >> So this is basically for implementing sudo-like caching for 2FA? >> >> > Yes that's exactly it. > > >> What authe

Re: [systemd-devel] Extend service runtime

On Mon, May 4, 2020, 23:31 Andy Pieters wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 15:51, Andy Pieters > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm trying to accomplish the following: >> >> An event happens -> I start a systemd service in response >> after RuntimeMaxSec is reached service terminates and cleans up event >>

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-hostnamed/hostnamectl and transient hostname change

ts are needed.) In practice, hostnamed does not do that (although several other systemd daemons do). It was probably forgotten to implement. D-Bus doesn't care about hostnames; it's just a message bus. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing l

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-timesyncd - use unprivileged ports

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 22:40 Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 31.03.20 um 20:32 schrieb Jędrzej Dudkiewicz: > > but I understand that > > systemd-timesyncd always uses unprivileged source port? > what else? > NTP has a "Symmetric Active" mode, where both peers use port 123 as source *and*

Re: [systemd-devel] _netdev for system root mount?

parameter as an ordering > constraint for the network block device is also not supported for system > root? > Same comment as above... how is systemd supposed to put other units before the rootfs, if they're started *from* the rootfs? -- Mantas Mikulėnas _

Re: [systemd-devel] _netdev for system root mount?

e shutdown-initramfs.) Either way – stopping a mount literally just unmounts the filesystem (which is supposed to be a safe operation). I'd probably be more worried about iscsi.service, since the blockdev losing connection *before* its fs is unmounted is actually the dangerous part... -- Man

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-timesyncd - use unprivileged ports

t. > It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it. > ___ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___

Re: [systemd-devel] Socket activation in parallel?

The default mode (Accept=no) expects your daemon to remain running forever and handle *all* requests in the same instance. Basically once the daemon is started and receives the listening socket, it continues working like a traditional daemon would: start an event loop, perhaps use threads or

Re: [systemd-devel] AF_INET socket ownership

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 11:09 PM Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Hey Mantas, > > Thanks for the reply. > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 12:06 PM Mantas Mikulėnas > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:26 PM Matt Zagrabelny >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, &g

Re: [systemd-devel] AF_INET socket ownership

ny instances of services having their own user accounts (httpd has its own, mariadb has its own, sshd has its own...) Some of them even implement the "privileged listener" model internally, e.g. httpd and sshd. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mail

Re: [systemd-devel] [EXT] Re: "[Match]" section in systemd.link file doesn't match interface

f warning: With Unicode collating sequences the ordering of such > files can sometimes be "unexpected" (e.g. comparing '-' with '.'). > AFAIK systemd itself always uses ASCIIbetical order (as it should). So it might not match with `ls` and `sort`, true, but at least it should work consistentl

Re: [systemd-devel] "[Match]" section in systemd.link file doesn't match interface

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 16:59 Felix wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'm failing to set an alias for a link using systemd-networkd. Am I > doing something wrong? Is this a bug? > > > I'm on this systemd version: > systemd 244 (244.3-1~bpo10+1) > +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA +APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-daemon documentation clarification

standard_output` as well. > AFAIK both stdout and stderr even get attached to the same journal pipe by default, so they should also be interpreted in the same way. The description of SyslogLevelPrefix= in systemd.exec(5) also says: "This only applies to log messages writ

Re: [systemd-devel] Read-only /etc, machine-id with an overlay - journald failing

/etc can't be that uncommon > and it is likely PEBKAC on our end. Is there some canonical way of > doing overlays with Systemd and we're screwing things up? > If you have an initramfs, consider setting up the /etc overlay there instead. -- Mantas Mikulėnas _

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd stop info

normally the code should remain invisible and just make text green. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] SSL_connect fails on systemd socket

is SSL connect request also be handled by systemd ? > No. Systemd will never read nor write the socket – your service needs to handle SSL handshake the same way as it normally would (mostly). (I haven't really worked with OpenSSL, but I'm guess

Re: [systemd-devel] SSL_connect fails on systemd socket

st connects to server with normal connect (server will > do accept) > Your .socket specifies Accept=true, so you should remove this part as well: the option means that systemd itself will accept the connection and only hand your server the accepted socket. -- Mantas Mikulėnas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >