On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 11.05.16 11:32, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi again all,
> >
> > TL;DR: would it be possible (or make sense) to have systemd Match rules
> for
> > network units that could match on some artifact of the network
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Michał Zegan
wrote:
> Hello, I have encountered a very interesting problem: I have a wired
> ipv4 network configured via systemd-network, and an ipv6 sit tunnel.
> The problem is it does not start. trying to restart systemd-networkd
> gives the error like both loc
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> These looked like a mass-replace gone slightly wrong – two statements
> with no { }'s, and no error checking.
> ---
> src/core/busname.c | 4 +++-
> src/core/manager.c | 5 -
> src/core/socket.c | 3 ++-
> 3 fi
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Susant Sahani wrote:
> Replaces a lof ot strerror() usage with log_netdev_error_errno()
> ---
> src/network/networkd-netdev-tunnel.c | 240
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)
>
> diff
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Susant Sahani wrote:
> This patch add support to create vti6 tunnel
>
> test:
>
> vt6.network
> [Match]
> Name=wlan0
>
> [Network]
> Tunnel=ip6vti
>
> vti6.netdev
> [NetDev]
> Name=ip6vti
> Kind=vti6
>
> [Tunnel]
> Local=2a00:ffde:4567:edde:
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Susant Sahani wrote:
> ---
> man/systemd.netdev.xml | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/systemd.netdev.xml b/man/systemd.netdev.xml
> index f413739..3bfd01b 100644
> --- a/man/systemd.netdev.xml
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Christian Brunotte wrote:
> systemd.network(5) with Options like "DNS=" and "Domains=" looks like
> /etc/resolv.conf will soon be superfluous.
In many setups, yes, but we will not aim at bug-for-bug compatibility
or anything like that. We are open to adding feature
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2015-04-22 14:26 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Wed, 22.04.15 14:22, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> 2015-04-22 14:14 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>>> > On Wed, 22.04.15 14:09, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> >
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 15.05.15 12:56, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com) wrote:
>
>> (build time option to ./configure that is)
>
> I guess I'd be OK with that...
It would be a shame if we started diverging on the defaults I think.
Would
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2015-05-15 22:16 GMT+02:00 Tom Gundersen :
>> on-demand I agree with Lennart that it makes the most sense to simply
>> unconditionally load the modules. If this is undesirable the solution
>> should be to teach the ke
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Michael Olbrich
wrote:
> there is an unaligned write in dhcp_identifier_set_iaid() and I'm not quite
> sure what the correct fix is:
>
> int dhcp_identifier_set_iaid(int ifindex, uint8_t *mac, size_t mac_len,
> uint32_t *_id) {
> [...]
> *_id = (id & 0xfff
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> I usually have two network interfaces on my laptops (one eth and one
> wlan), and when I was using sysvinit I also was configuring the bond
> interface via the /etc/network/interfaces file so the two interfaces
> could work in the active-ba
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 21.04.15 14:47, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
>> > I'm having a similar problem while running systemd version-219. Did you
>> > work
>> > out what was wrong?
>> >
&
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 2015-05-19 18:38, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>>> > # networkctl status --no-pager eth0
>>>> > ??● 3: eth0
>>>> >Link File: n/a
>>>> > Network File:
It seems this thread was already resolved, just wanted to add one comment:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> So to mount a successful spoof, the attacker needs to
> a) control the dhcp server domain option to return a domain under attacker
> control
Notice th
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:58 PM, David Herrmann
>>> wrote:
>>>>> A program running th
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Maw wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed that networkd occasionally fails to bring up one of two
>> network interfaces on boot (this happens about once every 70 or so
>> boots). The machine in qu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> I've created a container with systemd-nspawn, "machinectl enable"d it, then
> added machines.target to my default target (systemctl enable
> machines.target) so that containers will be autostarted on boot. That works
> so far.
>
> But I discover
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]:
>> We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in
>> no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd
>> project.
>
> This makes sense indeed. gudev u
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Nick Owens wrote:
> hello tom,
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Michael Marineau
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Nick Owens wrote:
>>>&g
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:54 PM, dmoneil2 wrote:
> The parser uses size_t for MTU however the structure is defined with unsigned
> int
> as the target type resulting in a value corruption for the next field of the
> structure.
>
> dmoneil2 (1):
> Fixed issue with corruption of speed value whe
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Michael Marineau
wrote:
> I haven't retested HEAD yet but up through 219 it would report 'no-carrier
> configuring' which seems bogus since it shouldn't be configuring an
> interface in such a state
"no-carrier configuring" could easily happen as we would enslave
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Rauta, Alin wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> Thanks for the answers.
>
> One more questions. Just a curiosity of mine.
>
> Currently, a user has to write scripts if he wants to save the run-time
> configuration in networkd format or to use a configuration management tool
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 15.05.15 22:49, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 15.05.15 12:56, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com)
&g
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> It's moved to the iio-sensor-proxy D-Bus service.
Nice! When was this released? Should we expect all distros to have
picked up this yet?
> ---
> .gitignore | 1 -
> Makefile.am| 1
Hi Mantas,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> So, udev v220 crashes in my initramfs with the following message:
>
>> starting version v220
>> Assertion 'manager->pid == getpid()' failed at src/udev/udevd.c:568,
>> function ev
>> Aborting.
>
> It seems main calls manager
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Allowed interface name is relatively small. Lets not make
> users go in to the source code to figure out what happened.
>
> --machine=debian-tree conflicts with
> --machine=debian-tree2
>
> ex: Failed to add new veth \
> int
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> It was a warning when we still supported kernel < 3.4. current
> minimum version is 3.7.
Hm, we don't actually fail out here, but we still try to continue.
Isn't 'warning' more appropriate in that case?
Cheers,
Tom
> src/core/main.c
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am| 1 +
> src/shared/generator.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index f84a28d..70d4dc0 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -1
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> currently it would only be included if configure was ran with --enable-gnuefi
> ---
> Makefile.am | 14 --
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile
Applied, with minor fix. Please verify that it still works for you!
Tom
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am | 15 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index 9420879..4933e6f
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index 4933e6f..8e38010 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -3128,7 +3128,7
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> This patch simplify swapon usage in systemd. The command swapon(8)
> since util-linux v2.26 supports "-o ". The idea is exactly the
> same like for mount(8). The -o specifies options in fstab-compatible
> way. For systemd
The behavior is mostly unchanged, but rather than only ever calling these
functions at
fixed points in the event loop, they are called directly whenever they are
invoked.
---
src/udev/udevd.c | 80 +++-
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 36 dele
Also move builtin and rules initialization from main loop to
event_queue_start().
No functional change.
---
src/udev/udevd.c | 42 +-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/udev/udevd.c b/src/udev/udevd.c
index 91fe3d9..e309def
---
units/systemd-udevd.service.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/units/systemd-udevd.service.in b/units/systemd-udevd.service.in
index 32f04d9..e7216d6 100644
--- a/units/systemd-udevd.service.in
+++ b/units/systemd-udevd.service.in
@@ -23,3 +23,4 @@ RestartSec=0
ExecStart=@
Rather than trying to schedule new events on every main-loop iteration, do it
explicitly when
processing an event finishes, a worker is killed, a new uevent is received, or
the event queue
is explicitly restarted.
---
src/udev/udevd.c | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 delet
This allows us to drop the special sigterm handling in spawn_wait()
as this will now be passed directly to the worker event loop.
We now log failing processe at 'warning' leve, otherwise the
behavior is unchanged.
---
src/test/test-udev.c| 7 --
src/udev/udev-event.c | 177 +++
---
src/udev/udevd.c | 378 ++-
1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/udev/udevd.c b/src/udev/udevd.c
index c9b0ed5..8cffd81 100644
--- a/src/udev/udevd.c
+++ b/src/udev/udevd.c
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
#include
#inc
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Tom, all,
>
> with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
>
> $ systemd-analyze
> Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
>
> which used to be
>
> $ systemd-analyze
> Startup finished in 703ms (kerne
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Torstein Husebø wrote:
> ---
> NEWS| 4 ++--
> man/journal-remote.conf.xml | 2 +-
> src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-control.c | 2 +-
> src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-creds.c | 6 +++---
> src/shared/architect
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> with systemd v220 I see inotify errors from udevd. I get this once:
>
> systemd-udevd: inotify_add_watch(9, /dev/sr0, 10) failed: Bad file descriptor
>
> And a lot of these:
>
> systemd-udevd: inotify_add_watch(9, /dev
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Martin Pitt on Tue, 2015/05/26 17:11:
>> Hello Tom, all,
>>
>> with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
>>
>> $ systemd-analyze
>> Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
>>
>> which used to be
>>
>>
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Martin Pitt on Tue, 2015/05/26 17:11:
>> Hello Tom, all,
>>
>> with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
>>
>> $ systemd-analyze
>> Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
>>
>> which used to be
>>
>>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
> My network is managed via systemd-networkd. I'm trying to create
> additional network bridge after another one service (VPN) is started.
>
> Right now I'm having a ExecStartPost directive, which creates
> /run/systemd/network, c
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Michael Olbrich
wrote:
> Otherwise building faild with kernel headers < v3.16
> ---
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> src/shared/missing.h | 11 +--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Tom, all,
>
> with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
>
> $ systemd-analyze
> Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
>
> which used to be
>
> $ systemd-analyze
> Startup finished in 703ms (kerne
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> It appears a few people see this, but I was not able to reproduce. If
>> anyone could reproduce with this patch applied [0], it would be most
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
> wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> It appears a few people see this, but I was not able to reproduce. I
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Michał Bartoszkiewicz
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that udev from systemd 220 does passes empty environment to a
> process spawned by a RUN rule.
> execve("/usr/sbin/crda", ["/usr/sbin/crda"], [/* 0 vars */]) = 0
> This breaks crda, as it expects to see COUNTRY in
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Jonathan Boulle
wrote:
> ---
> src/core/main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
> index c39815b10675..212ab901b18f 100644
> --- a/src/core/main.c
> +++ b/src/core/main
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Donnelly
We don't use s-o-b in systemd, so dropped this when applying. Also
adjusted the subject line a bit (for future reference).
Thanks for the patch! Pushed.
Cheers,
Tom
> ---
> man/systemd.slice.xml | 2 +-
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Oleg Samarin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an imsm raid-1 device /dev/md126 assembled of /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.
> I have a lvm group on top of /dev/md126p2 with some logical volumes. All
> this work fine with Fedora 21.
>
> I'm trying to fresh install Fedora 22 in some
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:36 PM, cee1 wrote:
> Which service type should a socket activated service be?
> 1. For systemd-udevd.service and systemd-journald.service, they are notify
> type
> 2. For dbus.service, it is simple type
A service can be of type 'simple' if all that other services care
a
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Abdó Roig-Maranges wrote:
>
> Andrei Borzenkov writes:
>
>> Was not it fixed by
>> 693d371d30fee1da58365121801445b404416ada?
>
> No.
>
> The first time it broke was due to the udev manager wanting to be used by a
> single process, and was fixed in 040e689654ef08c63
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Abdó Roig-Maranges
> wrote:
>>
>> Andrei Borzenkov writes:
>>
>>> Was not it fixed by
>>> 693d371d30fee1da58365121801445b404416ada?
>>
>> No.
>
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> With our 220 package I still get a broken environment in udev
> callouts, even with Tom's recent fix 0e3e605 applied.
>
> Curiously it works for devices like "lo" which don't have a lot of
> properties, but for "real" wlan devices I get invalid
Hi Karel,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> The current implementation directly monitor /proc/self/mountinfo and
> /run/mount/utab files. It's really not optimal because utab file is
> private libmount stuff without any official guaranteed semantic.
>
> The libmount since v2.26 p
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> systemd-timesyncd breaks with
>
> Starting Network Time Synchronization...
> [FAILED] Failed to start Network Time Synchronization.
>
> when we have timesyncd activated and systemd-networkd not. Create
> directory before using it.
Hm, t
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:06:56PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> > -(void)
>> > sd_event_source_set_description(m->mount_utab_event_source,
>> > "mount-utab-dispatch");
>> >
1]: Failed to finalize _ loop devices, ignoring
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45111
>
> c32eb440bab953a0169cd207dfef5cad16dfb340 is the first bad commit
> Author: Tom Gundersen
> Date: Tue Apr 14 16:25:06 2015 +0200
>
> libudev: ma
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 30.05.15 19:55, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> The next issue with your argument is: AFAIR nspawn doesn't create a macvlan
>> interface based on the machine name. You have to pass the name of a physical
>> interfac
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> It's moved to the iio-sensor-proxy D-Bus service.
>> ---
>> .gitignore | 1 -
>> Makefile.am| 15 --
>> rules/61-acceleromet
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> something I was wondering regarding kdbus and udev.
> If udev wants to drop the netlink transport and instead rely on kdbus,
> would this mean, systemd becomes mandatory in the initramfs to setup
> kdbus before udev is run?
_If_ udev drops n
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> something I was wondering regarding kdbus and udev.
>> If udev wants to drop the netlink transport and instead rely on kdbus,
>> would this mean, systemd bec
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2015-07-29 5:40 GMT+02:00 Tom Gundersen :
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> something I was wondering regarding kdbus and udev.
>>> If udev wants to drop the netlink transport and inste
Hi Markus,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:54 PM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> Programs from the systemd software library output also some log messages
> as it is usual for such server applications.
>
> Such messages correspond to specific data structures.
> * The log origin and log level are repeated th
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:16 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
>>> Such messages correspond to specific data structures.
>>> * The log origin and log level are repeated there while the recorded
>>> information might occasionally not be detailed enough.
>>> I find that such details can be better han
lt;https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/54683f0f9b97a8f88aaf4fbb45b4d729057b101c>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Michael Marineau
> wrote:
>> Working on bumping to 215 over here in CoreOS land, but I've got a
>>
Hi Lubomir,
Sorry not to have responded to this earlier, but as I was just
reminded of this, here are my take:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> the RFC 7217 specifies an algorithm for generating an IPv6 host address
> that stays stable in a particular network but changes w
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Jordan Hargrave wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Jordan Hargrave wrote:
>>> Cleaned up linux coding style
>>>
>>> This patch will integrate some of the features of biosdevname into systemd.
>>> The c
This is not really exposed nicely. There is a C library sd-network, which
will give you the events you want, but it is not yet public (you can still
copy it out of git of course).
On Nov 12, 2015 05:24, "J Decker" wrote:
> Should I have not said specifically Arch linux?
> Is it something that can
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:33 PM, J Decker wrote:
> Okay maybe it's not stored anywhere
>
> I was just having a plethora of network issues after updating.
>
> After finding others were reporting issues with the linux kernel 4.2.5
> I rollback to the prior stable 4.1.6... that resolved some of t
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:42 PM, J Decker wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:33 PM, J Decker wrote:
>>> Okay maybe it's not stored anywhere
>>>
>>> I was just having a plethora of network iss
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> So I am thinking about some spring cleaning, and would love to remove
> the following bits from the systemd package:
>
All this looks good to me.
> 1) systemd-initctl (i.e. the /dev/initctl SysV compat support). Last
>t
ed "After"
the preceding daemon in the array.
Two exceptions:
* if a daemon has an "!" in front of it, it should be ignored
* if a daemon has an "@" in front of it, no later daemon should have
an "After" dependency on it (the service is started in the back
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 16.06.10 14:19, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>> 1) parse the DAEMONS array from /etc/rc.conf
>> 2) each daemon should be made into a service and be scheduled "After"
>> the preceding
Tom
From 736fb6ca7d57df793d11c0cb2c038c91f2e6f1d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:27:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] util: add Arch welcome message
Arch has no release name, so juts prints 'Welcome to Arch Linux!'.
The color is the same as used by Arch's native rc.sysinit.
---
src/
Hi,
This patch should allow SystemD to be a drop-in replacement for SysV
init on Arch (modulo some minor bugs), as long as one uses a recent
kernel and dbus from [testing].
Cheers,
Tom
From 833ab8e8a7c44c2590a19a811c39d360453fac68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Sat, 18 Sep
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> This patch should allow SystemD to be a drop-in replacement for SysV
> init on Arch (modulo some minor bugs), as long as one uses a recent
> kernel and dbus from [testing].
Turns out I missed a bug. This version should also wor
Hi,
These two patches adds support for keymap, consolefont and locale
variables to Arch, similarly to how it is done for Fedora.
Cheers,
Tom
From fae894dd8cca8ccf11504e5401a875d8d8242219 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:45:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2
Hi Lennart,
[sorry for sending it twice, forgot to include the ML]
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 19.09.10 21:25, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>> +#ifdef TARGET_ARCH
>> + if ((r = parse_env_file("/e
Cheers,
Tom
From 09783847bf8a9da8594e53038058db103169895c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:15:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] units: split fsck.target from sysinit.target
A .mount unit (e.g. home.mount) will have dependencies After=fsck.target and Before=local-fs.targe
Hi,
I ran across this bug when I was trying to make my f...@.service work.
I wanted to fsck /dev/disk/by-label/boot, but systemd misstakenly
escaped and unescaped the path to /dev/disk/by\x2dlabel/boot.
The reason is that invalid characters in unit names are escaped as
\xFF. However, when
unescap
"Name=fsck.target" was removed from sysinit.target.am in a9e1f5ec360.
This also removes the symlink from the Makefile.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> "Name=fsck.target" was removed from sysinit.target.am in a9e1f5ec360.
> This also removes the symlink from the Makefile.
Sorry, forgot the patch.
0001-fsck-remove-symlink-from-fsck.target-to-sysinit.targ.patch
Descript
This is now split into smaller units and shipped with the downstream package.
0002-arch-remove-obsolete-sysinit.service.patch
Description: Binary data
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marius Tolzmann wrote:
>
> Hi there..
>
> I am new to systemd and I try to update our LinuxFromScratch based
> distribution to use systemd, because i really like the ideas and concepts
> mentioned in Lennarts blog posts..
>
> It already boots up and starts the essen
This is now done by os-release downstream.
---
src/util.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util.c b/src/util.c
index d769d60..a521b78 100644
--- a/src/util.c
+++ b/src/util.c
@@ -3079,13 +3079,6 @@ void status_welcome(void) {
if (!ansi_col
Avoids data loss when systemd freezes and a hard-reset is required.
---
src/main.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main.c b/src/main.c
index 99e277c..82c8ddb 100644
--- a/src/main.c
+++ b/src/main.c
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ _noreturn_ static void crash(i
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 01.01.11 19:46, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 29.12.10 00:12, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>>
>> > Avoids data loss when systemd freezes and a har
This is now done by a generator, shipped downstream.
---
src/service.c | 67 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/service.c b/src/service.c
index a28eb8a..e4dfa40 100644
--- a/src/service.c
+++ b/src/service
This is now shipped downstream.
---
Makefile.am |6 --
units/arch/rc-local.service | 19 ---
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 units/arch/rc-local.service
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 2fce30c..cc54f6f 10
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 20.01.11 23:08, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
>
>> if --disable-gtk is passed, vala is no longer a build dependency. under
>> these conditions, configure should not fail when vala 0.10 is found.
>
> Vala is required o
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Kay just lowered the vala requirement form 0.11 to 0.10, since
> apparently systemd compiles fine with that, too.
Great. That solves it as far as I'm concerned.
>> In other words, why not treat "vala < 0.11" the same way as we treat
>>
rtunity
to do so cleanly).
Cheers,
Tom
From e0eb5a4459ffe607eac5b21da3ad2ac6374b48e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:18:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] hwclock-load.service: fixed typo in comment
---
units/hwclock-load.service |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 ins
Hi guys,
Further to my previous mail about hwclock, I'm struggling to get my
head around what is the "proper" way to handle hwclock's adjfile.
These are my assumptions:
/etc is in principle mounted read-only (not yet possible, but that's
the goal, right?)
/var is in principle not available durin
A little nitpick/question:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> [Unit]
> Description=LVM activation
> DefaultDependencies=no
> After=udev-settle.service
> Before=local-fs.target
Is the Before=local-fs.target really necessary?
Any mounts that will reside on the lvm will already
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Well, maybe syncing it to local-fs is not necessary, but we probably
> want to sync it to basic.target at least. Mounts are not the only users
> of block devices, so a later service might want to use it and hence we
> should make sure t
Hi,
I have the following usecase, that might be a common one (I'm not sure).
In addition to my root partition I have two partitions that I use with
"comment=systemd.automount" and this works well. However, I think it
could be optimized, so I want to ask your opinion about the following
(I'll prep
1 - 100 of 1204 matches
Mail list logo
